CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice and Policy

PRACTICE & POLICY 

Avastin in Combination With Chemo Associated With Increased Fatality

By Cancer Network Editors | February 9, 2011

A team of researchers at Stony Brook University School of Medicine in New York published a paper in JAMA last week showing that patients who receive Avastin (bevacizumab), in combination with chemotherapy are at increased risk of side effects that may lead to death. Lead author Dr. Vishal Ranpura and his colleagues reported that the risk of fatal adverse events varied according to the type of chemotherapy agents used in conjunction with Avastin. There were also suggestions that the risk might vary by tumor type and dose of Avastin, but results were not definitive.

The randomized trials reviewed in this analysis involved more than 10,200 patients. Overall fatal events in patients who received Avastin was low--2.5% compared to 1.7 percent of patients who did not receive it. However, the increased risk was more than three times higher in patients who received Avastin in combination with platinum or taxane chemotherapy agents such as carboplatin(Drug information on carboplatin) and paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel). The most common fatal event, accounting for nearly one-quarter of the total, was hemorrhage. 

(MORE: Dr. Gunter von Minckwitz on How Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy Increases Complete Response in Patients With Early Stage HER2-Negative Breast Cancer)

This finding will most likely affect overall usage of Avastin. Because the most significant benefits from Avastin are seen, thus far, in colorectal cancer, it may be that the drug is used with less frequency for treating lung or breast cancers, where the risk may not outweigh the benefits.

In an editorial accompanying the new article in JAMA, Dr. Daniel Hayes of the UMichigan Comprehensive Cancer Center remarked that treatment with Avastin can run as high as $100,000 a year, but it is still unclear which patients benefit most from the drug. In fact, improvements in only three of the trials upon which FDA approval for Avastin were based, overall survival increased by less than three months. 

Genentech, the makers of Avastin, recently issued a response to the article that includes the following statement:

"...this meta-analysis includes cancer types for which Avastin is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and should not be used, including advanced squamous* cell non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), advanced prostate cancer and advanced pancreatic cancer. (Avastin is approved for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy.)

For three of the FDA-approved cancer types (advanced colorectal, renal cell and breast cancers), the incidence of treatment-related deaths reported in this analysis was similar between the Avastin and the control groups.  The higher incidence in NSCLC is known, however, the incidence reported in this analysis is greater than previously reported due to the fact that the analysis included patients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC, for which Avastin is not indicated. Overall, the authors note that “the absolute risk of treatment-related mortality is low” and the data should be considered in the context of potential benefit with Avastin."

For the full JAMA article, go here.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Barbara Gallagher | February 11, 2011 9:36 PM EST

In cancer medicine, it's not a case of throwing targeted drugs at the problem. It's knowing "what"targeted drugs and "how" to use them in "individual" patients (not average populations). The problem is that few drugs work the way oncologists think they do and few of them take the time to think through what it is they are using them for.
 
What may limit the effectiveness of Avastin is that there are multiple ways by which tumors can evolve that are independent of VEGF and independent of angiogenesis. It could be vastly more important to measure the net effect of all processes (systems) instead of just individual molecular targets (like VEGF).
 
The cell is a system, an integrated, interacting network of genes, proteins and other cellular constituents that produce functions. You need to analyze the systems' response to drug treatments, not just one or a few targets or pathways.
 
Whiz bang therapies often get a pass on toxicities because they are just so darn cool (Herceptin and CHF in the adjuvant setting is another example). Again, the problem is that few drugs work the way oncologists think and few of them take the time to think through what it is they are using them for.

Meanwhile, it's hard to tell a medical oncologist (and patient) to ratchet back on the anti-VEGF drug they're using when the disease setting is stage IV lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer. Therapy-related, late onset sequelae are becoming a very real problem.

Bevacizumab (Avastin) for Breast Cancer

Avastin/Paclitaxel Gets Accelerated Approval for Advanced Breast Ca

Avastin Breast Rx Trial Enrollment Halted Due to Cardiotoxicity Cases

FDA Panel Says No More Avastin in Breast Cancer

Breast Cancer Specialists Brace for FDA Word on Avastin

FDA and Avastin: Crossroads in an Era of Targeted Therapies

Bevacizumab Turns in Lackluster Results for Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Setting

Roche Appeals FDA Decision on Avastin

Avastin in Combination With Chemo Associated With Increased Fatality

FDA Revokes Avastin Approval for Breast Cancer Indication

SABCS: Bevacizumab Improves PFS in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in AVEREL Study

Dr. Gunter von Minckwitz on How Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy Increases Complete Response in Patients With Early Stage HER2-Negative Breast Cancer






 
RELATED CONTENT

How the Sequester Cuts Are Harming Oncology
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
Are CML Drugs Priced Out of Reach?
May 2, 2013
US Cancer Organizations Say Medicare Cuts Will Negatively Impact Cancer Patients
April 29, 2013
Oncologists Hope Congress Will Exempt Cancer Drugs From Sequester Cuts
April 27, 2013
Groups Issue New Social Media Guidelines for Physicians
April 26, 2013
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook
 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Health Care
Evidence on Health Care
Guidelines on Health Care
Patient Education on Health Care
Clinical Trials on Health Care
Practical Articles on Health Care
Research and Reviews on Health Care
All "Health Care" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy