CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice and Policy

PRACTICE & POLICY 

Ipilimumab Boosts Melanoma Survival, Gets Thumbs Up From FDA

By Anne Landry | March 25, 2011
Executive Editor, Oncology Nurse Edition

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 25 approved ipilimumab (Yervoy, Bristol-Myers Squibb) as immunotherapy for patients with late-stage melanoma, based on studies showing it improved survival outcomes in these difficult-to-treat patients.

Advanced melanoma is the leading cause of death from skin cancer, and there are few effective therapeutic options. Ipilimumab is the first drug approved for metastatic melanoma in 13 years and is the first drug ever to demonstrate overall survival improvement for this disease.

Ipilimumab works by blocking CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4), thereby enhancing antitumor T-cell responses. Its approval is based on phase III trial results showing that the drug achieved its primary endpoint of extending overall survival among previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma. Overall survival was greater among patients randomized to chemotherapy plus ipilimumab, compared with those treated just with chemotherapy. Details of the trial will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

Results of an earlier study of ipilimumab that included 676 patients with unresectable stage III or IV metastatic melanoma were published in the June 2010 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Lead investigator F. Stephen Hodi, MD, of Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and colleagues reported that patients who received ipilimumab either alone or with a gp100 (glycoprotein 100) peptide vaccine had a median survival of about 10 months, compared with 6.4 months for patients receiving gp100 alone (P < .0003), which translated to a 34% reduction in the risk of death for the patients treated with ipilimumab. There were 14 deaths (2.1%) related to the study drugs, 7 of which were associated with immune-related adverse events, the investigators said.

Owing to safety concerns, ipilimumab is being approved along with a plan to inform healthcare professionals and patients about important side effects that can occur with this treatment.

“This is a landmark advance for several reasons,” Thomas Gajewski, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago, who is President of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer. “First, this is a completely new way to treat cancer, by blocking a negative regulator of the immune response. Second, it is the first drug ever to show improved survival of metastatic melanoma patients. And third, we learned that clinical responses to immune therapies such as this one can take time, requiring some patience. FDA approval of this drug further strengthens the case for cancer immunotherapy. We anticipate other novel immune therapies that will benefit patients with cancer over the coming years.”

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Scott Smith | April 06, 2011 11:34 AM EDT

Does anyone know the appropriate HCPCS code for this drug?






 
RELATED CONTENT

Preventing Burnout in Oncology
June 18, 2013
Supreme Court Ruling Invalidates Myriad’s BRCA Gene Patents
June 14, 2013
How the Sequester Cuts Are Harming Oncology
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
Are CML Drugs Priced Out of Reach?
May 2, 2013
US Cancer Organizations Say Medicare Cuts Will Negatively Impact Cancer Patients
April 29, 2013
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook
 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Health Care
Evidence on Health Care
Guidelines on Health Care
Patient Education on Health Care
Clinical Trials on Health Care
Practical Articles on Health Care
Research and Reviews on Health Care
All "Health Care" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy