CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Genitourinary Cancer » Prostate Cancer

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 25 No. 6
RESEARCH REPORT 

Aggressive Prostate Cancer: High Blood Levels of Omega-3s Doubled the Risk, but High Levels of Trans–Fatty Acids Cut Risk in Half

By Anne Landry | April 27, 2011
Executive Editor, ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition

An analysis of data from 3,400 men in the large nationwide Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial indicates that, contrary to what might be expected, men with the highest blood percentages of DHA (docosahexaenoic acid), an omega-3 fatty acid commonly found in fatty fish, had 2.5 times the risk of developing aggressive, high-grade prostate cancer, compared with men who had the lowest levels.


Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), is a systematic name. Docosa refers to the 22 carbon atoms in the chain and hexa refers to 6 double bonds.

In another surprising finding, the investigators discovered that men with the highest blood ratios of trans–fatty acids, commonly found in processed foods containing partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, actually had a 50% reduction in the risk of aggressive prostate cancer.

Neither omega 3s nor trans–fatty acids were associated with a risk of low-grade prostate cancer, and omega-6 fatty acids, found in most vegetable oils and associated with inflammation and heart disease, were not associated with prostate cancer risk, the researchers reported.

The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and Subset Analysis
The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, a randomized clinical trial conducted across the US that tested efficacy of the androgen inhibitor finasteride(Drug information on finasteride) in preventing prostate cancer, involved nearly 19,000 men 55 years of age and older. Data in the analysis reported in the American Journal of Epidemiology by Brasky et al are from a subset of about 3,400 of the participants in the larger trial, half of whom developed prostate cancer (confirmed by biopsy) during the course of the study and half of whom did not.

The study authors are from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and the National Cancer Institute, which funded the research. The findings were published online on April 25 in the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Given the association between chronic inflammation and increased cancer risk, together with the cardiac benefits and anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3 fatty acids and the possible inflammation-promoting effects of omega-6 fats and trans-fats, the findings seem to be counterintuitive. “Specifically, we thought that omega-3 fatty acids would reduce and omega-6 and trans–fatty acids would increase prostate cancer risk,” commented lead author Theodore M. Brasky, PhD, a postdoctoral research fellow in the Cancer Prevention Program at FHCRC.

While the mechanisms by which omega-3s might increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer are unknown, Dr. Brasky emphasized that omega-3 fats have effects on other biologic processes, some of which may have an impact on the development of certain prostate cancers, and much more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn from the study findings. It is also premature to recommend that men (the majority of whom in the study got their omega 3s from eating fish, not from supplements) change their diets in any way. “Overall, the beneficial effects of eating fish to prevent heart disease outweigh any harm related to prostate cancer risk,” Dr. Brasky said. “What this study shows is the complexity of nutrition and its impact on disease risk, and that we should study such associations rigorously rather than make assumptions.”

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Ryan Grover | April 28, 2011 10:20 PM EDT

Remember, correlation is not causation.

Agree we shouldn't blame fish when this contradicts prior studies.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11403817

And we know low-fat diets also increase omega-3 levels:
http://jn.nutrition.org/content/131/2/231.full

See link below for a review of this study's caveats:
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/fish-oil-prostate-cancer/

by mary winegardner | April 28, 2011 5:35 PM EDT

How did thi e ages correlate in the groups? Have high omega three men been chosen out by longevity with associated increase in prostate ca?

by catherine calacanis | April 28, 2011 12:24 PM EDT

So will there be any recommendations regarding men already diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer using Omega-3 fish oil supplements?






 
RELATED CONTENT

Vegetable Fats May Reduce Risk of Death in Prostate Cancer Patients
June 14, 2013
Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Are the Proceduralists Running Amok?
ONCOLOGY,  June 11, 2013
Active Surveillance Not Only Reduces Morbidity, It Saves Lives
ONCOLOGY,  June 11, 2013
ASCO: Updated Analyses Confirm Safety and Efficacy of Ra-223 in CRPC
June 6, 2013
ASCO: Adding Curcuminoids to Docetaxel Shows Promise in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
June 5, 2013
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Prostate Cancer
Evidence on Prostate Cancer
Guidelines on Prostate Cancer
Patient Education on Prostate Cancer
Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer
Practical Articles on Prostate Cancer
Research and Reviews on Prostate Cancer
All "Prostate Cancer" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy