Gastric carcinoma is a major health problem
around the world. Its incidence, however, has steadily dropped
globally since World War II. This decreased incidence has been termed
an unplanned success. Although the incidence of gastric
cancer is lowest in North America, it still ranks as the eighth
leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In 1998, more
than 22,600 new cases of gastric cancer are expected to occur in the
United States, and 13,700 deaths are anticipated as a result.
Patients with gastric carcinoma often present with advanced disease,
because early detection is neither practiced nor possible in many
countries. Screening for early detection of gastric cancer is carried
out on a limited basis in Japan. Approximately 50% of patients are
diagnosed with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancer.
Median survival for patients with advanced disease ranges from 6 to
Although advanced gastric cancer is not curable, chemotherapy can
have a palliative effect in symptomatic patients. In four randomized
studies comparing combination chemotherapy with best supportive care
in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, quality of life and
overall survival improved in patients receiving chemotherapy.[3-6]
All four of these studies, however, were limited by small numbers of patients.
Few drugs are active when used as single agents to treat gastric
cancer. Response rates are usually £
20%, with rare complete remissions and brief response durations. The
pyrimidine analogue 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been studied most
extensively, producing a response rate of less than 20%. Other
agents such as mitomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin are also
considered active, producing response rates of approximately < 20%
when used as single agents.
In the early 1980s, the FAM (5-FU, doxorubicin, mitomycin) regimen
was considered the gold standard for treatment of patients with
advanced gastric carcinoma. In a revealing study performed by the
North Central Cancer Therapy Group (NCCTG), the FAM regimen was
compared with single-agent 5-FU and 5-FU plus doxorubicin. No
significant survival difference was detected among the three
regimens; however, response rates were higher in patients receiving
more than one agent (highest response rate seen with FAM, and higher
response rate with 5-FU/doxorubicin than with 5-FU alone). These
results suggest that combination chemotherapy is more appropriate
than single-agent therapy for palliative treatment.
Several randomized studies, comparing FAM with FAMTX (5-FU,
doxorubicin, methotrexate), FAMTX with ECF (epirubicin,
cisplatin, 5-FU), and FAMTX vs ELF (etoposide, leucovorin, 5-FU)
vs 5-FU/cisplatin have been reported. No one standard therapy has
emerged from these trials. The ECF regimen, which produced the best
response rates in the most recent comparison, has not been widely
accepted as standard therapy because it includes an experimental
agent (epirubicin) and uses a prolonged infusion schedule of 5-FU. In
addition, doxorubicin (a predecessor to epirubicin) is no longer a
primary agent used to treat advanced gastric carcinoma. Epirubicin as
a single agent is practically inactive against gastric carcinoma
(with less than 10% response rate). In addition, survival data from
ECF is similar to the survival data from FAMTX in a previous
randomized trial. This degree of overlap should cast some doubts
in embracing ECF as a standard. Thus it would appear that infusional
5-FU in combination with cisplatin is likely to produce satisfactory
palliation that is comparable to any combination studied thus far.
Recommended treatment (outside of clinical trials) is usually with
cisplatin-based or 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy. Clearly, more
active agents are needed for the treatment of this disease.
Chemotherapeutic approaches for gastric carcinoma, as for many solid
tumors, are continually evolving. Several new agents have been
studied recently in patients with gastric carcinoma, including
paclitaxel and docetaxel, irinotecan, oral etoposide, and oral 5-FU
biomodulators such as UFT and S-1.
Based on the activity of paclitaxel against adenocarcinoma of the
esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, a phase II study of
single-agent paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced,
unresectable gastric carcinoma was undertaken at M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center. A response rate of 17% was established. Other
studies of paclitaxel in advanced gastric carcinoma include a phase
II trial performed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG),
in which one partial response was achieved among 22 eligible patients
(response rate 5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 25%). In a
preliminary study by Tamura et al, three (21%) of 14 evaluable
patients achieved a partial response when treated with 3-hour
infusional single-agent paclitaxel. All three responders had
previously received chemotherapy. These preliminary reports suggest
that paclitaxel is modestly active against gastric carcinoma. In
addition, in a study of 34 patients treated with paclitaxel combined
with 5-FU and cisplatin, 50% responded.
Docetaxel has also been studied in patients with advanced gastric
carcinoma. The observed level of activity is similar to that reported
with paclitaxel. Taguchi et al reported 9 (20%) partial responses
among 45 evaluable patients with advanced gastric carcinoma who
received only 60 mg/m2 of docetaxel administered every 3 weeks.
Sulkes et al treated 37 advanced gastric carcinoma patients with 100
mg/m2 of docetaxel every 3 weeks and reported a 24% (8 of 33
assessable patients) partial response rate. In addition, a 17%
response rate was observed in an ECOG study of 41 chemotherapy-naive
patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. More recently,
assessment of combination chemotherapy including docetaxel (ie,
docetaxel-cisplatin) has demonstrated substantial activity against
advanced gastric carcinoma.
The topoisomerase-I inhibitor, irinotecan (CPT-11), has also
demonstrated activity against gastric carcinoma when used as a single
agent. Interestingly, irinotecan was shown in this study to be
active in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. In a study
using a combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin, 42% of patients
with gastric carcinoma responded; this high response rate was
confirmed in another study performed in Japan. Similarly, the
irinotecan/cisplatin combination appears to be active against
carcinoma of the esophagus.
1. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, et al: Cancer statistics, 1998. Ca
Cancer J Clin 48:6-29, 1998.
2. Philip PA, Ajani JA: Gastric carcinoma, in Pazdur R (ed): Medical
Oncology: A Comprehensive Review, 2nd ed, pp 235-246. Huntington, NY,
3. Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A, et al: Modified therapy with
5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric
cancer. Cancer 72:37-41, 1993.
4. Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Kouri M: A randomized, phase III trial
comparing fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) with
best supportive care in non-resectable gastric cancer (abstract 6).
Ann Oncol 3:12(suppl), 1992.
5. Glimelius B, Hoffmann K, Haglund U, et al: Initial or delayed
chemotherapy with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer.
Ann Oncol 5:189-190, 1994.
6. Scheithauer W, Komek G, Zeh B, et al: Palliative chemotherapy
versus supportive care in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A
randomized trial (abstract). Second International Conference on
Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of GI Malignancy, p 68. Koln,
7. Comis S: Integration of chemotherapy into combined modality
treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev 1:221-238, 1974.
8. Kelsen DP, Magill G, Cheng E, et al: Phase II trial of etoposide
(VP-16) in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Proc
Am Soc Clin Oncol 1:96, 1982.
9. Lacave A, Izarzugaza I, Aparicio L, et al: Phase II clinical trial
of cisdichlorodiammineplatinum in gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol
10. Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, et al: A comparison of three
chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and
gastric carcinoma: Fluorouracil vs. fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs.
fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin. JAMA 253:2061-2067, 1985.
11. Wils JA, Klein HO, Wagener DJ, et al: FAMTX (5-FU, Adriamycin and
methotrexate): A step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric
cancer: A Trial of the European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer of the Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group.
J Clin Oncol 9:827-831, 1991.
12. Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, et al: Randomized trial
comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus
fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced
esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:261-167, 1997.
13. Wilke H, Wils J, Rougier P, et al: Preliminary analysis of a
randomized phase III trial of FAMTX vs. ELF vs. Cisplatin/FU in
advanced gastric cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 14:206, 1995.
14. Ajani JA, Ilson DH, Daugherty K, et al: Activity of Taxol in
patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the
esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1086-1091, 1994.
15. Ajani JA, Fairweather J, Dumas P, et al: Phase II study of Taxol
in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer J Sci Am 4(4):269-274, 1998.
16. Einzig AI, Lipsitz S, Wiernik PH, et al: Phase II trial of Taxol
in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract:
The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Results. Invest New
Drugs 13:223-227, 1995.
17. Tamura F, Ohtsu A, Boku N, et al: Three-hour infusion of
paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol
18. Kim JS, Shin SW, Kim JH, et al: A phase II trial of Taxol,
cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced gastric
carcinoma (AGC). Cancer, 1998 (in press).
19. Taguchi T: A late phase II study of docetaxel in patients with
gastric cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16:263a, 1997.
20. Sulkes A, Smyth J, Sessa C, et al: Docetaxel in advanced gastric
cancer. Results of a phase II clinical trial. EORTC Early Clinical
Trials Group. Br J Cancer 70:380-383, 1994.
21. Einzig AI, Newberg D, Remick SC, et al: Phase II trial of
docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper
gastrointestinal tract previously untreated with cytotoxic
chemotherapy: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) results
of protocol E1293. Med Oncology 13:87-93, 1996.
22. Roth AD, Maibach R, Martinelli G, et al: Taxotere-cisplatin in
advanced gastric carcinoma: An active drug combination. Proc Am Soc
Clin Oncol 17:283a, 1998 (abstract No. 1088).
23. Kambe M, Wakui A, Nakao I, et al: A late phase II study of
irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced gastric cancers
(abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 12:198, 1993.
24. Shirao K, Shimada Y, Kondo H, et al: Phase I-II study of
irinotecan hydrochloride combined with cisplatin in patients with
advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:921-927, 1997.
25. Boku N, Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, et al: Phase II study of a
combination of CDDP and CPT-11 in metastatic gastric cancer: CPT-11
Study Group for Gastric Cancer (abstract No. 936). Proc Am Soc Clin
Oncol 16:264a, 1997.
26. Enzinger PC, Ilson DH, Saltz LB, et al: A phase II trial of
cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced esophageal
carcinoma (abstract no. 1085). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:282a, 1998.
27. Slevin ML: Low-dose oral etoposide: A new role for an old drug? J
Clin Oncol 8:1607-1609, 1990 (editorial).
28. Ajani JA, Mansfield PM, Dumas P: Oral etoposide for patients with
advanced gastric carcinoma. Cancer J Sci Am, 1998 (in press).
29. Pazdur R, Covington WP, Brown NS, et al: Comparative steady state
pharmacokinetics of oral UFT versus protracted intravenous
5-fluorouracil (FU) (abstract 1498). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15:474, 1996.
30. Namatame K, Sasaki E, Takeda S, et al: A double-blind comparison
of FUra plasma concentration by oral (UFT) vs continuous intravenous
infusion (5-FU). Jap J Cancer Chemother 20:2417-2419, 1993.
31. Takiuchi T, Ajani JA: UFT in gastric cancer: A comprehensive
review. J Clin Oncol 16:2877-2885, 1998.
32. Ohtsu A, Sakata M, Horikoshi N, et al: A phase II study of S-1 in
patients with advanced gastric cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol
17:262a, 1998 (abstract no. 1005).
33. Kurihara M, Koizumi W, Hasegawa K, et al: Late phase II study of
S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in patients with
advanced gastric cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:262a, 1998
(abstract no. 1007).
34. Humerickhouse RA, Schilsky RL: Thymidylate synthase inhibitors in
clinical development. Cancer Therapeutics 1:100-113, 1998.
35. DeMario MD, Ratain MJ: Oral chemotherapy. Rationale and future
directions. J Clin Oncol 16:2557-2567, 1998.