Combined-Modality Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer

Combined-Modality Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer

ABSTRACT: The treatment of head and neck cancer has traditionally consisted of surgery with postoperative radiation therapy. Chemotherapy has been reserved for palliation. In recent years, induction chemotherapy has been shown to allow for larynx preservation in patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy has been shown to provide a statistically significant survival benefit in selected studies and recent meta-analyses. In patients with nasopharyngeal cancer, the use of cisplatin and concomitant radiation therapy results in a marked survival benefit. [ONCOLOGY 11(Suppl 9):27-30, 1997]


Head and neck cancer occurs at an incidence of approximately 40,000 cases annually in the United States.[1] Approximately one-third of patients present with early-stage disease, which is usually cured with single-modality surgery or radiation therapy.[2]

The great majority of the remaining patients present with locoregionally advanced disease, ie, large primaries (T3, T4) and/or involvement of neck lymph nodes (N1 to N3). For many years, treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced disease has consisted of surgery with postoperative radiation therapy; patients with unresectable disease were treated with radiation alone. The majority of these patients developed recurrent disease (usually locoregionally) within the first 2 to 3 years following completion of therapy, resulting in poor long-term survival rates. As a result, investigational approaches have been pursued, including the integration of chemotherapy into combined-modality treatment plans.[3-5]

Chemotherapy in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

Most active agents in head and neck cancer have been defined in patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. Active single agents include cisplatin (Platinol), fluorouracil (5-FU), carboplatin (Paraplatin), the taxanes, and probably gemcitabine (Gemzar) and vinorelbine (Navelbine).[3] Additional agents with some reported activity include doxorubicin (Adriamycin), hydroxyurea, and mitomycin (Mutamycin). When administered to patients with recurrent disease, however, response rates to these single agents are low and overall median survival times rarely exceed six months.

Combination chemotherapy, such as cisplatin/5-FU, has been shown to result in higher response rates of approximately 30%; however, there is no clear indication of prolonged survival when combination chemotherapy is used instead of single-agent chemotherapy.[6,7] Similarly, the biochemical modulation of 5-FU with interferon has failed to result in a further prolongation of life.[8]

Investigation of new drugs or combinations is a current issue of interest. Also, the use of reirradiation with concomitant chemotherapy has resulted in encouraging early data.[9-14]

Combined-Modality Approaches for Head and Neck Cancer

Sequential Combined-Modality Therapy

Adjuvant and induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy approaches have been pursued with great interest over the past two decades. Initial pilot studies indicated much higher response rates when the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU was used for induction chemotherapy than had been reported in patients with recurrent disease.[15-19] Most pilot studies indicated overall response rates exceeding 80% and complete response rates of 50% and higher.

Survival data, however, were frequently less optimistic. For example, of 51 patients treated at the University of Chicago with cisplatin/5-FU followed by surgery and radiation therapy and additional adjuvant cisplatin/5-FU, only 5 patients were alive with a follow-up exceeding 5 years.[19]

Pilot studies also suggested that induction chemotherapy could be used with the intent of organ preservation.[20] Patients achieving biopsy-confirmed complete response to induction chemotherapy at the primary site were offered subsequent radiation therapy, with surgery reserved for patients with recurrent disease. The feasibility of this approach was confirmed in the pilot setting.

Randomized studies testing sequential combined-modality therapy have also been conducted.[21-27] Based on the phase II data, any hypothetical impact of induction chemotherapy on survival rates would be postulated to be small. Since many published studies utilized suboptimal chemotherapy regimens (eg, single-agent chemotherapy, low dose intensity, inactive drugs) or entered too few patients to be able to detect small differences, they must be considered inconclusive.[28]

Several large studies involving active combinations and large patient cohorts have been published in recent years. None of these trials has demonstrated that induction chemotherapy (or adjuvant chemotherapy) significantly prolongs survival for the entire patient cohort. Subset analysis has suggested, however, that at least some patients may benefit from the addition of sequential combined-modality therapy.[22,23,26] For example, in the Intergroup study, there was a trend toward increased survival in patients with extracapsular lymph node spread or close surgical margins who received chemotherapy.[23]

Two randomized studies have investigated the role of induction chemotherapy in an organ preserving strategy. The first study was the Veterans Administration's larynx preservation study.[25] In this study, patients received either standard therapy with surgery and postoperative radiation or two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, with laryngectomy reserved as a planned salvage procedure.

Early data indicated no difference in survival between the two study arms. Of patients receiving chemotherapy, however, 64% did not undergo laryngectomy. Long-term survival data from this study have not been published.

A European study investigated a similar concept for patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.[27] Here too, induction chemotherapy resulted in similar survival data while allowing for organ preservation; 42% of patients in the chemotherapy arm were alive with a functional larynx at 3 years of follow-up and 35% at 5 years.

Summary—Sequential combined-modality therapy has not improved survival rates to date. This may be due to the presence of cross-resistant cancer cells when using cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in sequence with radiation therapy.

Larynx preservation was shown to be feasible in two studies.[25,27] It is possible, however, that radiation therapy, by itself, would be as effective as chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy in allowing organ preservation. This hypothesis forms the basis of a large, current Intergroup study in the United States.

It must also be emphasized that induction chemotherapy remains an attractive setting in which to investigate new drugs or novel combinations in head and neck cancer. In particular, the taxanes and other recently identified agents with activity in solid tumors should be investigated as components of induction regimens.

Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy

Since failure to eradicate all tumor cells within the radiation field occurs in the majority of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer, it can be postulated that clinical radiation resistance is an important factor. One tool to overcome radiation resistance is the simultaneous administration of radiation and chemotherapy.[29,30] Preclinical experiments have indicated a variety of mechanisms of interaction by which concurrent chemotherapy can increase the cytotoxicity of radiation.

Clinical trials in patients with head and neck cancer have indicated that single agents, including 5-FU, bleomycin (Blenoxane), mitomycin, and methotrexate,[31-36] administered with concomitant radiation therapy can improve disease-free and/or overall survival rates. These findings have been confirmed by a recent meta-analysis, which found that concomitant chemoradiotherapy leads to a statistically significant improvement in the control of head and neck cancer.[37]

Combination chemotherapy also has been studied. A European study investigating the administration of cisplatin and daily IV bolus 5-FU in rapid alternation with radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone has recently been updated.[38] Improved disease-free and overall survival rates were seen on the chemotherapy arm; however, survival rates on both study arms were poor, and the quality of radiation therapy administration on the control arm has been questioned.[39]

Phase II studies involving combination chemotherapy with split-course radiation therapy have frequently indicated very impressive locoregional control and survival data.[40-47] This is of great interest since protracted administration of radiation therapy by itself has been considered detrimental. It appears that, in the presence of chemotherapy, at least limited protraction of radiation is feasible. Randomized clinical trials using these intensive regimens are awaited with great interest.

Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Nasopharyngeal cancer has historically been treated with radiation therapy alone since, due to its anatomic location, it is usually unresectable. The disease is known to have a higher propensity for regional and distant spread than other head and neck cancers.

Nasopharyngeal cancer has a high incidence on a worldwide basis and has been associated with the Epstein-Barr virus and exposure to highly salted foods.[48] Histopathologically, it is most frequently a lymphoepithelioma; in the United States, however, up to one-third of cases are of squamous-cell histology and are linked to the classic head and neck cancer risk factors of tobacco and alcohol.

Combined-Modality Therapy

Phase II studies suggest that chemotherapy has greater activity in nasopharyngeal cancer than in other head and neck cancers.[48] A sequential combined-modality therapy approach has been tested. Preliminary data suggest that induction chemotherapy improves disease-free survival, although a positive effect on overall survival has not yet been demonstrated.[49]

Recently, however, accrual for a randomized US study testing concomitant cisplatin and radiation therapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-FU was stopped prematurely when an interim analysis showed a large differential in disease-free and overall survival favoring the chemotherapy arm.[50] As a result, this approach is now considered standard therapy for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Whether these data are relevant to the endemic form of the disease in Asia remains to be established.[51,52]

Summary and Future Directions

The use of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer is becoming more established. Induction chemotherapy can be used with the intent of larynx preservation in patients with unresectable disease; concomitant chemoradiotherapy (eg, with 5-FU or mitomycin) can be justified in view of the otherwise poor prognosis of patients and the increasing body of evidence suggesting an improved outcome with this approach. Finally, for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer, concomitant cisplatin/radiation therapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin/5-FU should be considered an established standard approach.

Current areas of interest include studies of new drugs, both in induction and concomitant therapy regimens, as well as the pursuit of novel treatment approaches in patients with recurrent disease. It is hoped that these studies will lead to improved therapeutic tools in the future. Finally, chemoprevention strategies remain important, given the high number of second malignancies in patients cured of their first head and neck cancer.


1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, et al: Cancer statistics, 1996. CA Cancer J Clin 65:5-27, 1996.

2. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman S, et al: Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 328:184-194, 1993.

3. Vokes EE, Athanasiadis I: Chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: The future is now. Ann Oncol 7:15-29, 1996.

4. Brockstein BE, Vokes EE: Chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Principles and Practice of Oncology Updates 10:1-19, 1996.

5. Dimery IW, Hong WK: Overview of combined modality therapies for head and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:95-111, 1993.

6. Forastiere AA, Metch B, Schuller DE, et al: Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil vs methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 10:1245-1251, 1992.

7. Jacobs C, Lyman G, Velez-Garcia E, et al: A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 10:257-263, 1992.

8. Schrijvers D, Johnson J, Jacob H, et al: Modulation of cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy by interferon alfa in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: A phase III trial of the Head and Neck Interferon Cooperative Study Group (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15:312, 1996.

9. Vokes EE, Panje WR, Schilsky RL, et al: Hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil and concomitant radiotherapy in poor prognosis head and neck cancer: A phase I-II study. J Clin Oncol 7:761-768, 1989.

10. Vokes EE, Haraf DJ, Mick R, et al: Intensified concomitant chemoradiotherapy with and without filgrastim for poor-prognosis head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:2351-2359, 1994.

11. Haraf DJ, Weichselbaum RR, Vokes EE: Reirradiation of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancer: A potentially curable disease. Ann OncoI 7:913-918, 1996.

12. Gandia D, Wibault P, Guillot T, et al: Simultaneous chemoradiotherapy as salvage treatment in locoregional recurrences of squamous head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 15:15-23, 1993.

13. Weppelmann B, Wheeler RA, Peters GE, et al: Treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer with 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and reirradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 22:1051-1056, 1992.

14. Hartsell WF, Thomas CR Jr, Murthy AK, et al: Pilot study for the evaluation of simultaneous cisplatin/5-fluorouracil infusion and limited radiation therapy in regionally recurrent head and neck cancer (EST P-C385). Am J Clin Oncol 17:338-343, 1994.

15. Rooney M, Kish J, Jacobs J, et al: Improved complete response rate and survival in advanced head and neck cancer after three-course induction therapy with 120-hour 5-FU infusion and cisplatin. Cancer 55:1123-1128, 1985.

16. Thyss A, Schneider M, Santini J, et al: Induction chemotherapy with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 54:755-760, 1986.

17. Kies MS, Gordon LI, Hauck WW, et al: Analysis of complete responders after initial treatment with chemotherapy in head/neck cancer. Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 93:199-205, 1985.

18. Ervin TJ, Clark JR, Weichselbaum RR, et al: An analysis of induction and adjuvant chemotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 5:10-20, 1987.

19. Vokes EE, Mick R, Lester EP, et al: Cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy does not yield long-term benefit in locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results from a single institution. J Clin Oncol 9:1376-1384, 1991.

20. Jacobs C, Goffinet DR, Goffinet L, et al: Chemotherapy as a substitute for surgery in the treatment of advanced resectable head and neck cancer. A report from the Northern California Oncology Group. Cancer 60:1178-1183, 1987.

21. Head and Neck Contracts Program: Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma: Final report. Cancer 60:301-311, 1987.

22. Jacobs C, Makuch R: Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable head and neck cancer: A subset analysis of the Head and Neck Contracts Program. J Clin Oncol 8:838-847, 1990.

23. Laramore GE, Scott CB, al-Sarraf M, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: Report on intergroup study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:705-713, 1992.

24. Schuller DE, Metch B, Stein DW, et al: Preoperative chemotherapy in advanced resectable head and neck cancer: Final report of the Southwest Oncology Group. Laryngoscope 98:1205-1211, 1988.

25. The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group: Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 324:1685-1690, 1991.

26. Paccagnella A, Orlando A, Marcniori C, et al: Phase III trial of initial chemotherapy in stage III or IV head and neck cancers: A study by the Gruppo di Studio sui Tumori della Testa e del Collo. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:265-272, 1994.

27. Lefebvre J-L, Chevalier D, Luboinski B, et al: Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer: Preliminary results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:890-899, 1996.

28. Vokes EE, Haraf DJ, Weichselbaum RR, et al: Head and Neck Cancer, vol 3, pp 321-326. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series 1009, 1993.

29. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy: Rationale and clinical experience in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 8:911-934, 1990.

30. Vokes EE: Interactions of chemotherapy and radiation. Semin Oncol 20:70-76, 1993.

31. Lo TC, Wiley AL Jr, Ansfield FJ, et al: Combined radiation therapy and 5-fluorouracil for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: A randomized study. Am J Roentgenol 126:229-235, 1976.

32. Browman GP, Cripps C, Hodson DI, et al: Placebo-controlled randomized trial of infusional fluorouracil during standard radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin cancer: Update of a Northern California Oncology Group randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 5:1410-1418, 1987.

36. Bauchaud JM, David JM, Boussin G, et al: Combined postoperative radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin infusion for locally advanced squamous cell carnoma of the head and neck: Preliminary report of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20: 243-246, 1991.

37. El-Sayed S, Nelson N: Adjuvant and adjunctive chemotherapy in the management of squamous cell carnimoa of the head and neck region: A meta-analysis of prospective and randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 14:838-847, 1996.

38. Merlano M, Benasso M, Corvo R, et al: Five-year update of a randomized trial of alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in treatment of unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:583-589, 1996

39. Parsons JT, Medenhall WM: Re: Five-year update of a randomized trial of alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in treatment of unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (letter). J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1407, 1996: Mer-
lano M: Response to letter. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1407-1408, 1996.

40. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Mick R, et al: Favorable long-term survival following induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin and concomitant chemo- radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer, J Natl Cancer Inst 84:877-882, 1992.

41. Vokes EE, Kies M, Haraf DJ, et al: Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: Impact on the natural history of the disease. J Clin Oncol 13: 876-883, 1995.

42. Vokes EE, Stupp R, Haraf D, et al: Hydroxyurea with continuous infusion paclitaxel, 5-fluorouacil and concomitant radioterapy for poor prognosis head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol (suppl 6):22:47-52, 1995.

43. Adelstein DJ, Kalish LA, Adams GL, et al: Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer: An ECOG pilot study. J Clin Oncol 11:2136-2142, 1993.

44. Leyvraz S, Pasche P, Bauer J, et al: Rapidly alternating chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced head and neck carcinoma: Four-year results of a phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol 12:1876-1885, 1994.

45. Taylor SG IV, Murthy AK, Vannetzel J-M, et al: Randomized comparison of neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil infusion followed by radiation vs concomitant treatment in advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:385-395, 1994.

46. Kies MS, Haraf DJ, Mittal B, et al: Intensive combined therapy with C-DDP, 5-FU, hydroxyurea, and BID radiation (C-FHX) for stage IV squamous cancer of the head and neck (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15;314, 1996.

47. Wibault P, Bensmaine MEA, de Forni M, et al: Intensive concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase II study of radiotherapy with cisplatin and 7-week continuous infusional fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol 14:1192-1200, 1996.

48. Fandi A, Altun M, Azli N, et al: Nasopharyngeal cancer: Epidemiology, staging, and treatment. Semin Oncol 21:382-397, 1994.

49. Cvitkovic E: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin, bleomycin in undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer: Preliminary results of an international phase III trial (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 13:283, 1994.

50. Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PGS, et al: Superiority of chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer :Preliminary results of Intergroup (0099) (SWOG 8892, RTOG 8817, ECOG 2388) randomized study (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15:313, 1996.

51. Chan ATC, Teo PML, Leung TWT, et al: A prospective randomized study of chemotherapy adjunctive to definitive radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33, 569-577, 1995.

52. Teo PML, Leung TWT, Chan ATC, et al: A retrospective study of the use of cisplatinum-5-fluoroucil neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer Oral Oncol 31B:373-379, 1995.

© 1997 by PRR, Inc. All rights reserved.
Loading comments...
Please Wait 20 seconds or click here to close