Small-cell lung cancer accounts
for approximately one-fifth of
primary lung cancer cases. It possesses different biologic characteristics
compared with other types of lung cancers, including rapid tumor growth, early
metastases, and high level of sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Since patients with small-cell lung cancer usually present with disseminated
disease, combination chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients
in all disease stages, with major responses in 65% to 85% of cases, including
25% to 50% complete responses.
Most patients experience tumor relapse and die within 2 years,
however. With chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy, the median survival
duration is 10 to 15 months for limited-disease patients, and patients with
extensive disease show a median survival time of 7 to 11 months with
Combination chemotherapy regimens include CAV (cyclophosphamide
[Cytoxan, Neosar], doxorubicin [Adriamycin], and vincristine [Oncovin]); CAE
(cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide [VP-16, VePesid]); CAVE
(cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide; PE (cisplatin
(Platinol) and etoposide; and CE (carboplatin [Paraplatin] and etoposide). In
randomized trials, three regimensCAV, PE, and CAV alternating with PEyielded
similar survival rates, but PE resulted in less myelosuppression.[2,3]
Therefore, the most widely used regimen is the combination regimen PE.
There have been no major advances in the treatment of small-cell
lung cancer during the last decade. The recent advent of new active agents
including camptothecins, the taxanes, and gemcitabine (Gemzar) provides hope for
more effective therapies and, among these drugs, irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar)
is the most promising agent.
Irinotecan is a water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, and
exhibits strong antitumor activity in a broad spectrum of experimental
models.[4,5] Camptothecin and its derivatives possess a unique mechanism of
action that inhibits DNA topoisomerase I. Irinotecan is transformed to an
active metabolite (SN-38) by carboxylesterase, an enzyme that is mainly found in
the liver, bowel mucosa, and tumor tissue. Clinical studies have now shown that
irinotecan possesses significant activity against a variety of malignant
diseases, including small-cell lung cancer.
A Japanese phase I trial of irinotecan administered as a weekly
IV infusion demonstrated that its dose-limiting toxicities included leukopenia
and diarrhea, and the recommended dose for phase II studies was 100 mg/m2.
Based on these results, irinotecan was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 IV
once weekly in two phase II studies.[8,9] The results from four phase II trials
of irinotecan monotherapy in small-cell lung cancer are enumerated in Table
In a multi-institutional phase II trial, Negoro and coworkers
enrolled 41 patients, 35 of whom were evaluable for response. The overall
response rate was 37%, with a median response duration of 7 weeks. The response
rate was 33% in 27 previously treated patients and 50% in 8 previously untreated
patients. The median survival time was 35 weeks for all patients. The major
toxicities were grade 3 or higher leukopenia (31%) and diarrhea (15%).
A single-institution trial by Masuda and colleagues delivered
the same dose and schedule of irinotecan to 16 patients with refractory or
relapsed small-cell lung cancer, of whom 15 were evaluable for response and
toxicity. (All 15 patients had been heavily pretreated with some form of
cisplatin-based regimens.) Only one patient was refractory to chemotherapy as
defined by tumor growth during chemotherapy. Although there were no complete
responses in the 15 patients, a partial response was obtained in 47% of
patients, with a median duration of response of 8 weeks (range, 4 to 22 weeks).
The median survival time from the onset of irinotecan therapy was 27 weeks.
The most frequent adverse event was myelosuppression: 34% and 0%
of patients had severe leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (WHO grade 3 or 4),
respectively. Greater than grade 2 nausea and vomiting occurred in 13% of
patients, and diarrhea was observed in 7%. One patient (7%) experienced grade 4
paralytic ileus. Grade 3 or 4 pulmonary adverse events occurred in two patients
A French trial used a different approach with a dosage of 350
mg/m2 every 3 weeks that resulted in a lower overall response rate of 16% in 32
previously treated patients who had received etoposide-cisplatin-based
first-line chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 131 days, and
median survival was 125 days. The major grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia
(58%), febrile neutropenia (22%), delayed diarrhea (37%), and nausea and
Seventeen sensitive-relapse patients (those who initially
responded but progressed after a treatment-free interval of at least 90 days)
and 27 refractory patients (those who failed first-line treatment, or who
initially responded but progressed within 90 days of the end of therapy) were
enrolled in a US phase II study conducted by DeVore et al. Patients received
irinotecan at an initial dosage of 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 of 6 weeks. Response
rates were 35.3% in patients with sensitive disease and 3.7% in patients with
refractory disease, and median survivals were 5.9 and 2.8 months, respectively.
Overall survival was 4.8 months. Grade 3 or 4 late diarrhea was reported in
26.6% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 26.7%.
Overall, single-agent irinotecan exhibited encouraging response
rates in pretreated small-cell lung cancer patients, although studies examining
irinotecan in first-line therapy were lacking.
Irinotecan and Cisplatin
The preclinical synergism between irinotecan and cisplatin,
irinotecan’s lack of cross-resistance, and differing mechanisms of action
and toxicity profiles between the two drugs provided a rationale for examining
the use of these agents in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Masuda and
co-workers conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose
of irinotecan together with a fixed dose (60 mg/m2) of cisplatin in patients
with advanced lung cancer, and the dose-limiting toxicities of this combination.
The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 90 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, plus
cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks, with diarrhea being the
dose-limiting toxicitiy. In this phase I study, five (36%) partial responses and
one (7%) complete response were observed for an overall response rate of 43%.
The response rates for non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer
were 33% (4 out of 12 patients) and 100% (2 out of 2 patients), respectively.
The recommended dosages for phase II studies were irinotecan 80 mg/m2 on days 1,
8, and 15, plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks.
The West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) conducted a phase
II trial of this combination regimen in previously untreated small-cell lung
cancer patients. Kudoh et al initially administered irinotecan at
80 mg/m2 to 10 patients on days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with cisplatin 60
mg/m2 on day 1. The irinotecan dose was reduced to 60 mg/m2 because 3 of the
initial 10 patients experienced severe toxicity, and 1 of them died of diarrhea
Among the 75 patients that were enrolled, 72 were evaluable for
response, and all were assessable for toxicity (Table
2). Forty patients with
limited disease achieved an overall response rate of 83% and a complete response
rate of 30%; 35 patients with extensive disease achieved an overall response
rate of 86% and a complete response rate of 29%. The median response duration
was 8.0 months for limited-disease patients and 6.6 months for extensive-disease
patients. The median survival was 14.3 months for limited-disease patients and
13.0 months for extensive-disease patients. The 2-year survival rate was 21.7%
for limited-disease patients and 17.5% for extensive-disease patients. The major
grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (77%), anemia (39%), and diarrhea
In a similar study, patients with prior chemotherapy also
received irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 with cisplatin 60
mg/m2 on day
1. Sixteen patients were enrolled; the chemotherapy-free interval was more
than 90 days in nine patients, and less than 90 days in seven patients. The
overall response rate was 19%, and the median survival was 5.7 months. The
percentage of the projected dose of irinotecan administered was relative low
(57%), mainly due to leukopenia.
Other schedules have also been investigated. Both irinotecan (60
mg/m2) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2) were administered together on days 1, 8, and 15,
every 4 weeks. Among the five patients with refractory small-cell lung
cancer, one achieved a partial response.
1. Kelly K: New chemotherapy agents for small-cell lung cancer.
Chest 117:156-162, 2000.
2. Fukuoka, M, Furuse K, Saijo N, et al: Randomized trial of
cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide
versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer
Inst 83:855-861, 1991.
3. Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, et al: Randomized study of
cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin
versus alternation of these regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: A
phase III trial of Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:282-291,
4. Kunimoto T, Nitta K, Tanaka T, et al: Antitumor activity of
7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothecin, a novel
water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, against murine tumors. Cancer Res
5. Matsuzaki T, Yokokura T, Mutai M, et al: Inhibition of
spontaneous and experimental metastasis by a new derivative of camptothecin,
CPT-11, in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 21:308-312, 1988.
6. Hsiang YH, Liu LF: Identification of mammalian DNA
topoisomerase I as an intracellular target of the anticancer drug camptothecin.
Cancer Res 48:1722-1726, 1988.
7. Negoro S, Fukuoka M, Masuda N, et al: Phase I study of weekly
intravenous infusions of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in the
treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst
8. Negoro S, Fukuoka M, Niitani H, et al: A phase II study of
CPT-11, a camptothecin derivative, in patients with primary lung cancer. CPT-11
Cooperative Study Group [in Japanese]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 18:1013-1019, 1991.
9. Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y, et al: CPT-11: A new
derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed
small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:1225-1229, 1992.
10. Le Chevalier T, Ibrahim N, Chomy P, et al: A phase II study
of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients (pts) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)
progressing after initial response to first-line chemotherapy (CT) (abstract
1617). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16:450a, 1997.
11. DeVore RF, Blanke CD, Denham CA, et al: Phase II study of
irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer
(SCLC) (abstract 1736). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:451a, 1998.
12. Kudoh S, Takada M, Masuda N, et al: Enhanced antitumor
efficacy of a combination of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, and
cisplatin against human lung tumor xenografts. Jpn J Cancer Res 84:203-207,
13. Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kudoh S, et al: Phase I and
pharmacologic study of irinotecan in combination with cisplatin for advanced
lung cancer. Br J Cancer 68:778-782, 1993.
14. Kudoh S, Fujiwara Y, Takada Y, et al: Phase II study of
irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated
small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1068-1074, 1998.
15. Okishio K, Furuse K, Kawahara M, et al: A phase II study of
irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) in previously treated small-cell lung
cancer (SCLC) (abstract 1914). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:497a, 1998.
16. Nakanishi Y, Takayama K, Takano K, et al: Second-line
chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with refractory
lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 22:399-402, 1999.
17. Kano Y, Suzuki K, Akutsu M, et al: Effects of CPT-11 in
combination with other anti-cancer agents in culture. Int J Cancer 50:604-610,
18. Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kudoh S, et al: Phase I and
pharmacologic study of irinotecan and etoposide with recombinant human
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for advanced lung cancer. J Clin
Oncol 12:1833-1841, 1994.
19. Masuda N, Matsui K, Negoro S, et al: Combination of
irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung
cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:3329-3334, 1998.
20. Nakamura S, Kudoh S, Komuta K, et al: Phase II study of
irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with etoposide (VP-16) for previously untreated
extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): A study of the West Japan
Lung Cancer Group (abstract 1815). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:470a, 1999.
21. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, et al: Randomized phase III
study of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin in
extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study
(JCOG9511) (abstract 1887). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:483a, 2000.