CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » SUPPLEMENTS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 18 No. 2 Supplement
Highlights from the 2008 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 

High-Dose Fulvestrant at Least as Good as Anastrozole in First-Line MBC

By Guest Editor Aman U. Buzdar, MD
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | February 1, 2009

There is evidence that higher doses of fulvestrant (Faslodex) may have greater activity than the approved dose of 250 mg/mo. The FIRST trial (Fulvestrant First-Line Study) compared 500 mg vs anastrozole(Drug information on anastrozole) 1 mg/d in the first-line advanced disease setting, finding that a dose of 500 mg/mo achieved response rates and clinical benefit rates similar to those obtained with anastrozole 1 mg/d but gave a significantly longer time to progression (abstract 6126).

The multicenter open-label study randomized 205 postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients to fulvestrant HD (two 250-mg injections) on or about days 0, 14, and 28, and monthly thereafter, or to 1 mg/d of oral anastrozole. For 75% of patients, this was the first line of treatment for advanced disease.

The investigator-determined response rates were 36% and 35.5%, respectively, in the fulvestrant and anastrozole arms. With fulvestrant HD, the clinical benefit rate (response plus stable disease for = 24 wk) was numerically higher at 72.5% vs 67% with anastrozole. Time to progression (TTP), however, was signifi cantly longer for fulvestrant HD, with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (P < .05). Median TTP had not been reached as compared with a median TTP of 12.5 months for anastrozole.

“At the data cutoff , 29.4% of patients treated with high-dose fulvestrant had progressed compared with 41.7% of those in the anastrozole group,” reported Matthew J. Ellis, MD, PhD.

Median duration of response and duration of clinical benefit both favored fulvestrant HD.

The fulvestrant HD regimen was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile comparable with that of anastrozole and consistent with that previously reported for the standard dose. The incidence of injection site pain with fulvestrant HD (5.9%) was similar to that seen with fulvestrant 250 mg (4.6%), despite there being twice as many injections per month in the HD regimen.

The ongoing phase III CONFIRM trial (Comparison of Fulvestrant in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer) is evaluating fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg per month, which should help clarify the role of the higher dose, Dr. Ellis added.
 

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





CancerNetwork on Facebook


 
SUPPLEMENTS BY YEAR
2010
2009
 
Topic Index

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
Most Popular
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Skin Lesions
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Supplements
Evidence on Supplements
Guidelines on Supplements
Patient Education on Supplements
Clinical Trials on Supplements
Practical Articles on Supplements
Research and Reviews on Supplements
All "Supplements" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy