CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Survivorship

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 11 No. 6
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Panel Creates ‘Single Language’ for Grading Delayed Effects

June 1, 2002

ST. PETERSBURG, Florida—New cancer regimens are sometimes a double-edged sword, offering better survival but also delayed toxicity affecting quality of life. At the Late Effects of Normal Tissues (LENT) IV workshop, an international, multidisciplinary panel tackled the Herculean task of defining, grading, and reporting chronic toxicity. The workshop included representatives from more than 10 countries, including two European organizations.

"It’s not a clear-cut issue like survival—we’re trying to quantitate about 500 different toxicity endpoints in a uniform way," said conference moderator Andy Trotti, MD, associate professor and director of clinical research in radiation oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center at the University of South Florida, Tampa. "The delayed effects of cancer treatment are usually far less visible than acute effects, less appreciated even by experienced professionals, and often much harder to measure."

Delayed effects of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery include chronic fatigue, musculoskeletal atrophy and fibrosis, pain syndromes, limited mobility and exercise intolerance, dry mouth and dental disease, chronic edema, impaired cognitive and sexual functions, chronic intestinal dysfunction, and increased risk of heart disease and stroke.

Reporting and analyzing complications like these has, in the past, often suffered from a hit-or-miss approach: culling random observations hastily scrawled in charts or relying on complaints from patients, who are often reluctant to trouble harried providers.

Over the years, different cooperative oncology groups have developed their own toxicity scales. These groups include the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and at least four others. However, lack of uniformity among the different scales hinders comparability and interpretation of results.

"Through the hard work of the participants of this workshop, one day in the near future, all of these organizations should be able to speak in a single toxicity language, utilizing a common platform, a common library of definitions, terminology, and severity scaling guided by standardized data collection and reporting techniques," Dr. Trotti said.

His team is comprised of 90 investigators, including surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, nurses, research associates, biologists, statisticians, and other specialists; 12 National Cancer Institute (NCI) representatives; and 25 industry sponsors.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Survivorship
Evidence on Survivorship
Guidelines on Survivorship
Patient Education on Survivorship
Clinical Trials on Survivorship
Practical Articles on Survivorship
Research and Reviews on Survivorship
All "Survivorship" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy