CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
 
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
PATIENTS
NURSES
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Survivorship

ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition. Vol. 24 No. 4
Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Helping Patients Access Protections of the ADA

By Victoria L. Thomas, JD
ADA – Novo Nordisk Legal Advocacy
Staff Attorney
American Diabetes Association
Alexandria, Virginia

Arnold L. Potosky, PhD
Professor of Oncology
Director of Health Services Research
Georgetown University Medical Center
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cancer Control Program
Washington, DC | April 12, 2010
Note from the authors: For simplicity, this article will refer only to the Americans with Disabilities Act, but another federal law, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, also protects individuals from disability discrimination in places that receive federal funding. All changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act are equally applicable to the Rehabilitation Act.
Financial Disclosure: The authors have no significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturers of any products or providers of any service mentioned in this article.

When she learned that she had breast cancer, Patricia Garrett did what many people with cancer do: she continued working. Just a few weeks after her initial surgeries, she returned full-time to her position as the Director of Nursing at a University of Alabama hospital. At various points during her radiation treatment and chemotherapy, she took leave from her job. She always returned to work within a short period of time post-treatment, until one day her supervisor told her she was being demoted. Ms. Garrett brought a discrimination lawsuit because she felt that she was unfairly demoted due to her cancer. The federal court that heard her case, and the federal court of appeals that reviewed the lower court's decision, ruled against her. Following Supreme Court precedent that limited who was protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act, the courts held that regardless of whether Ms. Garrett was treated unfairly, her cancer did not sufficiently limit her abilities, and so she did not have a disability—making it perfectly legal for her employer to demote her for having cancer.[1]

The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA), which became effective on January 1, 2009, amends the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to restore the original intent of Congress to protect people with chronic conditions such as cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, and mental illness from discrimination at work, school, public places, and elsewhere.[2] The ADAAA provides hope that in the future, cases like Patricia Garrett's will be decided differently. This hope can only be realized with the help of healthcare professionals.

The article in this issue of ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition by Barbara Hoffman, JD, provides an excellent, comprehensive analysis of the new law. Here we expand on this analysis by offering additional advice to healthcare professionals regarding how to help a cancer survivor establish that he or she is entitled to the ADA's protections. These protections include establishing qualification for an employment opportunity and requiring changes in the workplace (“reasonable accommodations”) that allow survivors to continue working while protecting their health.

HELPING YOUR PATIENT ESTABLISH “DISABILITY” UNDER THE ADA

As noted by Ms. Hoffman, a cancer diagnosis has a negative impact on many surviviors' employment opportunities. Cancer survivors may seek the help of their healthcare providers when facing discrimination at work related to their cancer. Many of them may have no idea that such discrimination is illegal until a knowledgeable healthcare professional points this out.

Once a survivor is aware of the protections of the ADA, he or she will still need the assistance of a healthcare professional to document the diagnosis and to establish that cancer is a disability. To establish employment protections under the amended ADA, a cancer survivor must still prove that he or she meets the law's definition of “a person with a disability.”[3] While the ADAAA made it much easier for healthcare professionals to document that a patient with cancer has a disability, as Hoffman explains, it did not remove the requirement of a basic showing that cancer substantially limits a “major life activity.”[3]

The article by Hoffman does not directly address a great challenge that the ADA once posed to healthcare professionals. Before the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, medical experts who testified regarding whether a person's cancer qualified as a disability under the law were often placed in the difficult position of establishing two possibly conflicting facts: first, that a cancer survivor was sick enough to meet a very demanding standard of disability, and second, that the person was not too sick to do his or her job. Because of Supreme Court rulings narrowing the definition of a disability, that is, a substantial limitation in a major life activity, medical experts had to focus on the ways that cancer substantially limited a person's ability to undertake basic activities such as walking.

Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
  • Breast Cancer
  • CML
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • End-of-Life
  • GIST
  • Genetics Genomics
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Integrative Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Palliative Care
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy
  • Prostate Cancer
  • RCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Triple-Negative Breast
  • Testicular Cancer


More Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Tax Schemes Every Physician Should Avoid
Ike Devji, JD, January 31, 2012
The next 60 days marks the final push to sell physicians across the United States tax plans of both good and questionable value.
Boosting Collections at Your Medical Practice: Whose Job Is It?
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, January 28, 2012
Embrace the relationship between your billing company and your medical practice staff.
Managing Difficult Medical Practice Employees
Shelly K. Schwartz, January 27, 2012
Tips for transforming immature staff members into great employees.
Prevent Physician Distraction When Using mHealth Technology
Aubrey Westgate, January 25, 2012
As more and more physicians use handheld mobile technology in their day-to-day work, some critics are raising concerns about “distracted doctoring.”
Can That Applicant Do the Job at Your Medical Practice?
Karen Zupko, January 25, 2012
If like many communities, yours has significant numbers of non-English speaking people with whom neither you nor your staff are able to converse, your practice is at a serious disadvantage.
 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Head and Neck Tumors
  • 46-Year-Old Woman Presents With Difficulty in Ambulation, and Swelling and Discoloration of Both Eyelids
  • Optimizing Outcomes of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Drug Sequencing and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
  • A 28-Year-Old Woman Presents With a Long-Standing History of Intermittently Painful “Bumps” on Both Her Shoulders and Upper Back
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Evolution of Treatment Options for Patients With CRPC and Bone Metastases: Bone-Targeted Agents That Go Beyond Palliation of Symptoms to Improve Overall Survival
  • Ending the Shortage of Generic Oncology Drugs
  • Processed and Red Meat Consumption Linked to Slight Increase in Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
  • New Mutation May Act as Driver in Subset of Lung Cancer Patients
  • Could Aspirin Be a Viable Adjuvant Treatment for Cancer?
  • Advances and New Research in the Treatment of Kidney Cancer
  • New Way to Predict Prostate Cancer Severity—Size of Prostate
  • Vismodegib Granted FDA Approval for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • FDA Grants Approval to Axitinib for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Why BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancers Don't Respond to BRAF Inhibitors
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
JOB LISTINGS

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Survivorship
Evidence on Survivorship
Guidelines on Survivorship
Patient Education on Survivorship
Clinical Trials on Survivorship
Practical Articles on Survivorship
Research and Reviews on Survivorship
All "Survivorship" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

 

CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy