Adrenocortical Carcinoma at Low/Intermediate Recurrence Risk Does Not Benefit From Postoperative Adjuvant Mitotane


Efficacy of adjuvant mitotane for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma following surgery was presented at 2022 ASCO GU.

Postoperative mitotane treatment in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and low-to-intermediate recurrence risk did not lead to significant benefits, according to data presented at the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

“Adrenocortical carcinoma is an extremely rare malignancy with an expected incidence of about 0.7 [to] 2 new cases per million population per year in the western countries,” explained lead author Alfredo Berruti, MD, during the presentation of the data. “Surgery is the main stay of therapy; however, due to the rarity, the diagnosis is often delayed so that the surgery is usually feasible in about 50% of patients [who] have presentation. Even if radically operated [on, patients with] adrenocortical carcinoma are at high risk of relapse.”

Ninety-one patients were enrolled in ADIUVO, all of whom had stages I to III ACC, had undergone R0 resection, and had a Ki-67 percentage of 10.

Of the enrolled patients, 45 received adjuvant mitotane and 46 were observed. The median age (51 vs 50.5 years for the mitotane and observation arms, respectively), gender proportion (female, 73% vs 67%), percentage of patients with stage I ACC (20% vs 26%), percentage of patients with stage II ACC (67% vs 63%), percentage of patients with stage III ACC (13% vs 11%), ACC secretion (44% vs 36%), and Weiss score (5 vs 5) were relatively matched for both arms.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant mitotane or active surveillance. Those who received adjuvant mitotane were administered a starting dose of 1.5 g per day, and if tolerated well, an increased dose from 2 g to 3 g per day on day 2, an increased dose of 3 g to 4.5 g per day on day 3, and an increased dose of 4 g to 6 g per day on day 4. After reaching 6 g per day, patients were administered this dose until first mitotane blood level was estimated.

The primary end point of ADIUVO was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and safety.

If patients refused randomization, they were eligible for enrollment in the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study. This was a prospective study, where patients were managed in parallel with the ADIUVO study without the aspect of randomization. Of these patients, 42 received adjuvant mitotane and 53 went untreated. Similarly, baseline characteristics were matched between the 2 arms. This cohort was evaluated with the ADIUVO cohort to make up for low patient recruitment.

Results of the ADIUVO study showed that there were 8 recurrences in the adjuvant mitotane arm and 11 recurrences in the observation arm at a median follow up of 48 months. There were also 2 deaths in the adjuvant mitotane arm and 5 deaths in the observation arm; however, there was no significant difference between the RFS and OS when comparing the 2 arms.

In addition, investigators found that the HR for recurrence was 1.321 (95% CI, 0.55-3.32; P = .54) and the HR for death was 2.171 (95% CI, 0.52-12.12; P = .29) in the observational arm.

As for the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study, results confirmed those of ADIUVO. The number needed to treat (NNT) was determined as 55.

Given a 5-year RFS of 75%, the authors of this study pointed out that the findings do not support postoperative adjuvant mitotane treatment in patients with ACC at low-intermediate risk of recurrence, and that these outcomes provide “an important step toward personalization of ACC care.”

In his concluding remarks, Berruti said, “Of course, the smaller size than planned due to early interruption and the low accrual rate is the main limitation of this trial, however it should be noted that patients meeting the eligibility criteria of the ADIUVO trial have a relatively good outcomes, since they have a 25% risk of relapse and 14% risk of death at 5 years. So, 70% of patients could potentially be cured with surgery only.”


Berruti A, Fassnacht M, Libè R, et al. First randomized trial on adjuvant mitotane in adrenocortical carcinoma patients: The Adjuvo study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):1. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.001

Related Videos
Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec’s efficacy compares favorably with the current nonsurgical standards of care in high-risk, Bacillus Calmette Guerin–unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Treatment with tisotumab vedotin may be a standard of care in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, says Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Future analyses will look at durvalumab/olaparib for endometrial cancer populations with TP53 and POLE alterations, as well as those with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity.
Patients with mismatch repair proficient, newly diagnosed, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer may have enhanced benefit with the addition of olaparib to durvalumab.
Common adverse effects following treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase 3 CLEAR study include diarrhea, hypertension, and fatigue, according to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP.
Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab appears to raise no new safety signals in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after 4 years of follow-up in the phase 3 CLEAR study.
Related Content