TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 41

TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background

Additional therapies are needed to improve outcomes in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). TROP2 is commonly overexpressed in patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer and is associated with poor prognosis.Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT; MK-2870/SKB264) is a novel anti-TROP2 antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-TROP2 antibody coupled to a cytotoxic belotecan derivative via a novel linker (average drug/antibody ratio, 7.4).In a phase 1/2 study, intravenous sac-TMT alone had antitumor activity in patients with previously treated HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (ORR, 36.8%).TroFuse-010 evaluates sac-TMT alone or with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2− unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not previously received chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

This phase 3, randomized, open-label study (NCT06312176) is enrolling patients 18 years and older with HR+/HER2− unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, ECOG performance status 0 to 1, and a tumor sample for central assessment of TROP2 expression and HR, HER2, and PD-L1 status. Patients are candidates for chemotherapy and had either (a) PD after 1 line or more of ET, 1 of which was with a CDK4/6i; (b) PD 6 months or less after starting first-line ET plus CDK4/6i, where the CDK4/6i was discontinued before the PD; (c) PD less than 6 months after starting first ET plus CDK4/6i where the CDK4/6i was discontinued before the PD and PD on an additional ET, either as monotherapy or with a PI3K or mTOR inhibitor; or (d) relapse during or 12 months or less after completing CDK4/6i given as adjuvant therapy with ET.Key exclusion criteria are prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and, if treated with prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence 6 months or less after completion of chemotherapy. Patients are randomized 3:3:2 to intravenous sac-TMT 4 mg/kg every 2 weeks, intravenous sac-TMT 4 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 weeks, or physician’s choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, or liposomal doxorubicin) until radiographic PD, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or discontinuation criteria are met. Randomization is stratified by PD-L1 combined positive score, TROP2 expression, and region. Primary end points are PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) with sac-TMT vs physician’s choice chemotherapy and sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab vs physician’s choice chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR with sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab vs sac-TMT, overall response rate, duration of response, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

Status

Active recruitment is ongoing.

Articles in this issue

55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content