Alina Markova, MD, on Topical Ruxolitinib Mechanism of Action in Cutaneous Chronic GVHD

Video

Alina Markova, MD, speaks to the mechanism of action of topical ruxolitinib INCB018424 phosphate 1.5% cream vs oral ruxolitinib and other topical therapies used in the treatment of non-sclerotic and superficially sclerotic chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease.

Alina Markova, MD, a dermatologist and director of inpatient consultative dermatology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® during the 2022 Tandem Meeting, about the mechanism of action for topical ruxolitinib INCB018424 phosphate 1.5% cream (Opselura) in patients with non-sclerotic and superficially sclerotic chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

The mechanisms of topical ruxolitinib are similar to oral ruxolitinib (Jakafi), with both targeting the JAK/STAT pathway. Markova also emphasized that topical treatment is unique from others in the space due to a more targeted approach with less toxicity.

Transcript:

As many of us know, oral ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that was approved for the treatment of both acute and chronic GVHD. Topical ruxolitinib has the same mechanism, it can reduce inflammation in the skin. The JAK/STAT pathway, as we know, plays a role in advancing GVHD, a it’s the same mechanism. As far as how it compares, it’s much more targeted and has less toxicity topically than the other available options that we have.

Reference

Markova A, Prockop SE, Dusza S, et al. Interim results of a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled trial on safety and efficacy of a topical inhibitor of Janus kinase 1/2 (ruxolitinib INCB018424 phosphate 1.5% cream) for non-sclerotic and superficially sclerotic chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease. Presented at: 2022 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings; Salt Lake City, UT; April 23-26, 2022. Abstract 390.

Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Related Content