Dan Pollyea, MD, MS, on the Discovery and Incidence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in Patients With AML

Video

IDH1/2 mutations have been detected in nearly 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

A study of venetoclax (Venclexta) plus azacitidine (Vidaza) resulted in higher response rates, longer duration of response, and a higher median overall survival versus azacitidine alone for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring IDH1/2 mutations who were treatment naïve and ineligible for chemotherapy.

The results of the study, which pooled data from an ongoing phase 3 study (NCT02993523) and a phase 1b study (NCT02203773), were presented at the 2020 American Society for Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition, and provided further evidence of an effective treatment for this patient cohort, many of whom are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy due to existing comorbidities or age.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Dan Pollyea, MD, MS, of the University of Colorado Cancer Center, discussed how these mutations were originally discovered.

Transcript:

We have only known about the presence of IDH in AML for about the last 10 years. It’s really a fascinating story. A little over 10 years ago, the first patient with cancer had whole genome sequencing performed. That patient happened to [have AML], and that patient happened to have an IDH1 mutation. That was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. We’ve since gone back and looked and done targeted resequencing to see what the incidence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are in AML; it’s upwards of 20% of patients who have these mutations, which we didn’t even know about them before. It’s really fascinating story. Add to that the fact that these are targetable mutations on their own and that there are 2 therapies that are specifically FDA approved for use in the relapse setting for patients with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. There’s just been a lot of excitement around this in general.

Reference:

Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, et al. Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1058-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903840

Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Related Content