Panobinostat Regimen Yields Benefit for R/R Myeloma After Frontline ASCT

Video

Evidence from a matched pair comparison with a concurrent control cohort suggests that panobinostat plus gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan improves progression-free survival in those with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, especially after first transplant.

Panobinostat (Farydak) in combination with gemcitabine (Gemzar), busulfan (Busulfex), and melphalan (Megace Alkeran) produced positive evidence of clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, especially after first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), according to Yago L. Nieto, MD, PhD.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Nieto, a professor in the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Division of Internal Medicine at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, described the design of a matched pair comparison with a concurrent control cohort (NCT02506959) assessing the regimen and detailing efficacy.

In a population of 80 patients who received the regimen, the median progression-free survival was 45 months, 21 months, and 32 months after frontline ASCT-1, first salvage ASCT-1, and second ASCT, respectively; the median follow-up was 51 months.

Lead author, Nieto, presented these findings as part of an abstract at the 2023 Tandem Meeting.

Transcript:

It was not a randomized trial but it's good evidence because a matched pair concurrent control analysis is likely the second-best evidence we have next to randomized trials. This [was a] rationally designed regimen of panobinostat, gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan.

I say ‘rationally’ because it was designed based on our work in the lab where we saw that there was striking synergism between panobinostat, which is the best HDAC inhibitor we have, and gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan, with a great increase of cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and markers of DNA damage on the myeloma cells.

We saw that there's improvement of progression-free survival, which is a perfectly valid end point given that overall survival requires much longer follow-up. It's also contingent on the therapies you have available upon relapse, [which] keep getting better. It's going to be very difficult to encounter overall survival differences in myeloma in any study.

We saw that there's an improvement of progression-free survival compared with our matched controls when first transplant is done, either for patients with high-risk disease or relapsed disease. In the future, it may be the only kind of transplant we're going to be doing for myeloma; second transplants may not play much of a role given the availability of CAR T and other therapies.

Reference

Nieto Y, Yang Z, Valdez BC, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new high-dose chemotherapy regimen of panobinostat, gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan (Pano/GBM) with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for patients with high-risk or refractory/relapsed myeloma – matched pair comparisons with a concurrent control cohort. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2023;29(suppl 2):S31-S32.

Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Immunotherapy may be an “elegant” method of managing colorectal cancer, says Gregory Charak, MD.
D. Ross Camidge, MD, PhD, spoke about how the approval of alectinib is the beginning of multiple other approvals for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Administering neoadjuvant therapy to patients with colorectal cancer may help surgical oncologists attain a negative-margin resection.
Increasing screening for younger individuals who are at risk of colorectal cancer may help mitigate the rising early incidence of this disease.
Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.