Physician Assistant Details Importance of AE Management in Follicular Lymphoma

Video

The education of patients on identifying and reporting adverse effects is a critical part of effective toxicity management.

Depending on the grade of toxicity, clinicians will determine which course of action is best to treat it. Jennifer L. Garson, PA-C, suggested one way to manage adverse effects (AEs) is to dose reduce, although such a strategy may also compromise the clinical responses that a patient has already obtained.

Garson, a physician assistant from Rush Health in Chicago, spoke with CancerNetwork® during an Around the Practice® filming which focused on the current treatment options for follicular lymphoma.

Transcript:

We have patients who are on therapies, and one of our biggest challenges is how we manage any AEs. We all know that, with any medication, there is potential for AEs. In patients who have low-grade AEs, where it maybe isn’t disrupting their quality of life, it’s usually a tolerable AE. We don’t do a whole lot outside of maybe supportive care if there’s mild nausea. We may have to prescribe some medication for nausea if they’re having muscle cramping or some of these other myalgias we can see with it. It’s more about the supportive care in that.

It’s when we get to the grade 3/4 toxicities that it becomes a little bit more difficult to manage because you are stopping therapy, waiting for some of those toxicities or AEs to resolve before potentially restarting the therapy. When you do restart it, you’re looking at dose reductions.

When you do dose reductions, there’s going to be some compromise in your overall response rates and your duration of response. There are always those challenges. In doing that, it’s educating the patient about what they’re looking for [in] teasing out those AEs. Some AEs could be manifested by something other than medication. Looking at that, and trying to figure out the best way to keep a patient on an overall well-tolerated drug in the setting of some of these minor AEs, is a whole lot easier than looking at these grade 3/4 toxicities and moving into the next treatment.

Related Videos
Increasing screening for younger individuals who are at risk of colorectal cancer may help mitigate the rising early incidence of this disease.
Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.
The use of proton therapy may offer a more specific depth charge compared with conventional radiation, according to Timothy Chen, MD.
ZAP-X may provide submillimeter accuracy when administering radiation to patients with brain tumors.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and higher PD-L1 expression may benefit from treatment with tislelizumab, according to Syma Iqbal, MD.
Quantifying disease volume to help identify potential recurrence following surgery may be a helpful advance, according to Sean Dineen, MD.
Sean Dineen, MD, highlights the removal of abdominal wall lesions and other surgical strategies that may help manage symptoms in patients with cancer.
Related Content