Leukemia

Latest News

A reduced dosing duration of venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents may be appropriate for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
VEN-HMA May Prolong Survival in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Population

May 17th 2024

A reduced dosing duration of venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents may be appropriate for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Alternative treatment strategies may be necessary for a high-risk population of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and residual FLT3-ITD.
Pre-Transplant FLT3-ITD Detection Confers Relapse/Death Risk in AML

May 15th 2024

Phase 3b data support venetoclax as a treatment option in CLL for patients with or without B-cell receptor–associated kinase inhibitor treatment.
Venetoclax Elicits Enduring Responses in R/R Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

May 2nd 2024

FDA Grants Breakthrough Therapy Status to Ziftomenib in R/R NPM1+ AML | Image Credit: © LASZLO - stock.adobe.com.
FDA Grants Breakthrough Therapy Status to Ziftomenib in R/R NPM1+ AML

April 24th 2024

Preliminary findings from the MB-106 trial support the potential benefit of annamycin/cytarabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Annamycin Earns European Orphan Drug Designation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

April 22nd 2024

Latest CME Events & Activities

Patient, Provider, and Caregiver Connection: Addressing Pediatric and AYA Patient Concerns While Managing Hodgkin Lymphoma

View More

Patient, Provider, and Caregiver Connection™: Individualizing Care for Patients with Schizophrenia—Understanding Patient Challenges and the Role of Innovative Treatment

View More

Improving Outcomes in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias at the Intersection Between Hematology and Oncology Care

View More

B-Cell Tumor Board: Rendering Real World Personalized Treatment Plans in CLL/SLL and MCL Through the Lens of Emerging BTKi Evidence

View More

Applying New Evidence in Multiple Myeloma Care from Frontline to R/R Disease

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 5th Annual Precision Medicine Symposium – An Illustrated Tumor Board

View More

Community Oncology Connections™: Overcoming Barriers to Testing, Trial Access, and Equitable Care in Cancer

View More

Translating New Evidence into Treatment Algorithms from Frontline to R/R Multiple Myeloma: How the Experts Think & Treat

View More

Medical Crossfire: How Has Iron Supplementation Altered Treatment Planning for Patients with Cancer-Related Anemia?

View More

Medical Crossfire®: The Experts Bridge Recent Data in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With Real-World Sequencing Questions

View More

Community Practice Connections™: Pre-Conference Workshop on Immune Cell-Based Therapy

View More

More News


Site Logo

New Therapeutic Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.


Site Logo

What Is the Optimal Initial Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.