Commentary on Abstract #527

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

Ever since the first phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol) began, there has been ongoing controversy about the optimal dose and schedule of administration of this drug. The initial reports of marked antitumor activity against metastatic breast cancer were obtained using 250 mg/m² administered by 24-hour continuous IV infusion. This schedule was originally developed in an attempt to reduce the incidence and severity of anaphylactic reactions. Subsequent to the determination that this dose and schedule was effective and safe, there were multiple attempts to develop more convenient schedules, and dose/schedules associated with an improved side-effect profile.

Ever since the first phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol) began, there has been ongoing controversy about the optimal dose and schedule of administration of this drug. The initial reports of marked antitumor activity against metastatic breast cancer were obtained using 250 mg/m² administered by 24-hour continuous IV infusion. This schedule was originally developed in an attempt to reduce the incidence and severity of anaphylactic reactions. Subsequent to the determination that this dose and schedule was effective and safe, there were multiple attempts to develop more convenient schedules, and dose/schedules associated with an improved side-effect profile.

In 1994, several investigators started to explore weekly schedules of administration of paclitaxel, to increase dose intensity. The early reports suggested a surprising modification of the safety profile of paclitaxel using this schedule, with maintenance of substantial antitumor activity.

Breier et al (Br Cancer Res Treat 57[1]:124, 1999) were able to maintain a very high dose intensity with the weekly schedule over substantial time periods; second, severe myelosuppression was virtually absent, and therefore, no febrile neutropenia was reported; third, steroid premedication was successfully tapered and discontinued in many patients without hypersensitivity reactions. Finally, in a group of patients with previous exposure to anthracyclines, they observed a 53% objective response rate.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) shows marked antitumor activity against breast cancer. Although its activity is less schedule dependent, the impressive change in the safety profile of paclitaxel associated with the weekly schedule prompted the evaluation of docetaxel given weekly. As described in the abstract by Loeffler et al (abstract #527), similar changes in the toxicity profile of docetaxel were observed: myelosuppression decreased dramatically, as did the frequency and severity of infectious (febrile) complications. Furthermore, this was accomplished without apparent loss of therapeutic activity.

Both paclitaxel and docetaxel are currently under formal evaluation in multiple prospective randomized trials, comparing weekly and every-3-weekly schedules of administration. In some, the agents are used alone, while in others, combinations with other agents are being tested. The results of these trials will define the optimal schedule of administration for both taxanes.

Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Immunotherapy may be an “elegant” method of managing colorectal cancer, says Gregory Charak, MD.
D. Ross Camidge, MD, PhD, spoke about how the approval of alectinib is the beginning of multiple other approvals for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Alexander Spira, MD, PhD, FACP, an expert on lung cancer
A panel of 4 experts on lung cancer
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides