Data Support Liso-cel as an ‘Important’ Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory CLL

Commentary
Video

Treatment with lisocabtagene maraleucel in the TRANSCEND CLL 004 study raises no new safety concerns in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, says Tatyana Feldman, MD.

Efficacy and safety data from the phase 1/2 TRANSCEND CLL 004 study (NCT03331198) presented during the 2023 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition appear tosupport lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel; Breyanzi) as a next-line therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to Tatyana Feldman, MD, in an interview with CancerNetwork®.1

Feldman, an attending physician at John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack Meridian Health, highlighted data related to responses and survival in both the overall study population (n = 88) and a primary efficacy analysis set including those with disease progression following prior therapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and venetoclax (Venclexta; n = 50). Based on these findings, she anticipates that liso-cel will hopefully receive regulatory approval as a treatment option in CLL.

The FDA previously granted priority review to liso-cel as a treatment for relapsed/refractory CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma in November 2023 based on findings from the TRANSCEND CLL 004 study.2

Transcript:

We have an overall response rate [in the overall population] which sits at [48%] with a complete response rate—which was a primary end point—at [19%]. And what’s very important is that undetectable MRD in the blood for both cohorts was [66%], which is a very high number. As this analysis showed, that translates into duration of response; [these are] very meaningful responses. The duration of complete response is not reached, and duration of partial response is also quite long. We have 24.0 months for the total cohort and [12.4] months for the double-resistant cohort. Time to next therapy, which was a post-hoc analysis, was [18.4] months and [12.4] months, respectively.

These are very reputable numbers for these patient populations.

Overall survival was not reached in patients who achieved a response and [10.7] months for non-responders. From a standpoint of toxicity, there are no novel signals. Cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] incidences were 85% and 45%, respectively. However, most of it was grade 1/2 and easily manageable. [Liso-cel] is hopefully going to be approved intervention soon [for] our armamentarium for [patients with] CLL.

This analysis is confirming the duration of the response [of liso-cel]. We have such a long duration of complete responses—which was not reached—as well as a very reputable duration of partial response of [18.4] months. This is a very important [treatment] that should be adopted by the community as a next-line therapy. That’s my opinion, particularly for the patients who progress after BTK inhibitors and BCL2 inhibitors.

References

  1. Siddiqi T, Maloney DG, Kenderian SS, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in R/R CLL/SLL: 24-month median follow-up of TRANSCEND CLL 004. Blood. 2023;142(suppl 1):abstract 330. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179529
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration accepts for priority review Bristol Myers Squibb’s application for Breyanzi (lisocabtagene maraleucel) for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). News release. Bristol Myers Squibb. November 9, 2023. Accessed December 14, 2023. https://shorturl.at/pJMS6
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content