(S010) A Phase III Randomized Trial of MRI-Mapped Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Post-Prostatectomy: The MAPS Trial-Feasibility and Acute Toxicity

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

This study demonstrates that even though most MRI-identified GTVs are located in close proximity to critical structures, dose escalation is achievable without exceeding rectal constraints in all cases, and bladder constraints in the majority of cases. These variations are in cases with small bladders encompassed in the CTV and are not associated with increased acute toxicity.

Amber Orman, MD, Alan Pollack, MD, PhD, Kelin Wang, PhD, Radka Stoyanova, PhD, Elizabeth Bossart, PhD, Deukwoo Kwon, PhD, Matthew Abramowitz, MD; University of Miami

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: MAPS is the first phase III randomized trial of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-mapped dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy. In this planned feasibility analysis, we relate dosimetry to acute toxicity in the setting of dose escalation using a simultaneous incorporated hypofractionated boost (SIHB) to MRI-identified lesions in the prostate bed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated for each patient treated on the MAPS protocol, regardless of actual randomization arm: one for the standard fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) arm and one for the SIHB arm. In the SFRT arm, 68 Gy in 34 fractions was prescribed to ≥ 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). In the SIHB arm, an additional 2.25 Gy daily SIHB was prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) (2.25 Gy daily, total dose of 76.5 Gy in 34 fractions). The trial stipulates that no more than 35% and 55% of the rectum should receive ≥ 65 Gy and ≥ 40 Gy, respectively, and that no more than 50% and 70% of the bladder minus the clinical target volume (B-CTV) should receive ≥ 65 Gy and ≥ 40 Gy, respectively. Acute toxicities were recorded for patients at designated times per protocol according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

RESULTS: Data from the first 14 enrolled patients were reviewed to ensure dosimetric adequacy of the protocol requirements. In all plans, at least 95% of the PTV received 68 Gy, and at least 95% of the GTV received 76.5 Gy. Dosimetric constraints were achieved for all organs at risk (OARs) except B-CTV. Five cases had > 70% of the bladder receiving ≥ 40 Gy in both plans, and one case had > 50% of the bladder receiving ≥ 65 Gy in the SIHB plan only. The only difference between the SFRT and SIHB plans, per patient or overall, was a higher percent volume of the PTV receiving 68 Gy in the SIHB plans. In 13 patients for whom full data were available, the highest toxicity recorded was grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity: one episode in each arm.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that even though most MRI-identified GTVs are located in close proximity to critical structures, dose escalation is achievable without exceeding rectal constraints in all cases, and bladder constraints in the majority of cases. These variations are in cases with small bladders encompassed in the CTV and are not associated with increased acute toxicity.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Related Content