Multidisciplinary Evaluation and Treatment: Evolution to Standard Clinical Practice

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 11 No 9
Volume 11
Issue 9

Combined-modality therapy integrating chemotherapy with radiotherapy and/or surgery is playing an increasing role in the day-to-day management of a wide variety of solid tumors. No longer is this approach solely a clinical research tool. In fact, in

Combined-modality therapy integrating chemotherapy with radiotherapy and/or surgery is playing an increasing role in the day-to-day management of a wide variety of solid tumors. No longer is this approach solely a clinical research tool. In fact, in many clinical settings, combined-modality therapy is now the standard of care.

Concomitantly, the paradigm for evaluating cancer patients has shifted from a single practitioner representing a single discipline or modality to multidisciplinary evaluation and management teams that integrate the expertise and treatment skills of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. In both academic and community settings, multidisciplinary clinics in which patients are evaluated using this team approach are increasingly employed. This approach facilitates and expedites appropriate staging, entry into clinical trials, and everyday patient care. In general, patients appreciate this opportunity to obtain both multiple opinions and consensus regarding treatment-planning issues.

The rationale for combined-modality therapy is twofold: optimizing local tumor control by the use of local modalities, ie, surgery or radiotherapy, while addressing both locally advanced primary tumors and distant micrometastases with the use of systemic chemotherapy. A number of different approaches integrate chemotherapy with local therapy: chemotherapy can precede local therapy (induction or neoadjuvant), be given concurrently, or follow local therapy (adjuvant). For many tumor types, the optimal combination of modalities and their sequence remains to be defined. Yet evidence is emerging in a variety of clinical settings that a combination of local therapy plus systemic chemotherapy results in an outcome superior to that of either local modality alone.

In this symposium, leading investigators in combined-modality therapy describe recent advances in their respective areas. Although considerable differences exist depending on tumor type and combined-modality regimen employed, common themes of improved local control, reduction in distant metastases, and improved organ function or preservation are present. The following presentations not only define the current status of combined-modality therapy but also point to future directions in this area of clinical research and clinical practice.

Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Immunotherapy may be an “elegant” method of managing colorectal cancer, says Gregory Charak, MD.
D. Ross Camidge, MD, PhD, spoke about how the approval of alectinib is the beginning of multiple other approvals for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Alexander Spira, MD, PhD, FACP, an expert on lung cancer
A panel of 4 experts on lung cancer
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides