(S049) Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Locally Recurrent Brain Metastases Treated Previously With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Repeat SRS represents a potential salvage therapy for patients with locally recurrent brain metastases, providing additional tumor control with acceptable toxicity, even in the setting of prior SRS, surgical resection, and/or WBRT. Repeat SRS may also be reasonable to use to either avoid or delay the treatment of WBRT.

Douglas E. Holt, BS, Beant S. Gill, MD, David A. Clump, MD, PhD, Steven A. Burton, MD, John C. Flickinger, MD, Jonathan A. Engh, MD, Nduka Amankulor, MD, PhD, Dwight E. Heron, MD; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with local recurrence of brain metastases following prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be challenging to manage. Given the concerns of neurotoxicity with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), we evaluated the efficacy of repeat SRS (rSRS) for patients with locally recurrent brain metastases after initial SRS (iSRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review from 2004 to 2014 identified 108 patients (133 lesions) who received rSRS due to locally recurrent brain metastases after iSRS. Among these patients, 19.4% had WBRT prior to rSRS, with 40.6% of the lesions previously treated with surgical resection. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated from rSRS for overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant brain failure (DBF), as well as radiation-related toxicity. Cox proportional hazards modeling was conducted to establish predictive factors for OS, LC, DBF, and toxicity (P < .05) from the time of rSRS.

RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 12.0 months (range: 0.03–65.7 mo) from rSRS, the median OS was 14.2 months (range: 0.33–65.2 mo), with 12- and 18-month OS rates of 56.6% and 44.3%, respectively. On univariate analysis, inferior survival was associated with lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (P = .038), presence of extracranial metastases at iSRS (P = .003), new metastases at the time of rSRS (P = .027), having rSRS < 9 months from iSRS (P = .019), and melanoma histology (P = .015). For all metastases from rSRS, the 12- and 18-month LC rates were 77.5% and 71.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis for local failure showed no significant association. Regarding DBF, the 12- and 18-month estimates were 52.8% and 62.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis for DBF was significant for melanoma (P < .01) and persistent systemic disease at rSRS (P = .012). Multivariate analysis showed a significant association for DBF with melanoma (hazard ratio [HR] = 22.34; P value < .00), presence of extracranial disease at rSRS (HR = 2.89; P = .07), and having at least one new brain metastasis at rSRS (HR = 3.32; P = .03), with an overall model P value < .00. Twelve patients (11.1%) had grade 3 radiation toxicities following rSRS at a median time of 4.0 months (range: 1.2–10.6 mo). The grade 3 toxicities consisted of radiation necrosis (10), seizure (3), headache (3), and an optic nerve disorder. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were seen. Neither a dose nor volume relationship with toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SRS represents a potential salvage therapy for patients with locally recurrent brain metastases, providing additional tumor control with acceptable toxicity, even in the setting of prior SRS, surgical resection, and/or WBRT. Repeat SRS may also be reasonable to use to either avoid or delay the treatment of WBRT.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Related Content