Patients with mantle cell lymphoma appeared to benefit from brexucabtagene autoleucel as salvage therapy in the real-world setting.
Based on real-world treatment data, brexucabtagene autoleucel (Brexu-cel; Tecartus) continues to be an acceptable salvage treatment strategy for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and could be of particular benefit to those with high-risk features, according to a letter published in Blood Advances.1
Investigators included a higher-risk population compared with the phase 2 ZUMA-2 trial (NCT02601313)—which supported approval of the CAR T-cell product in this setting2—and compared it with the real-world toxicity profile of brexu-cel. Notably, grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was less frequent with delayed onset in the real-world study compared with the pivotal trial. However, investigators noted that fatal events were more likely to occur on their study at 15% vs 3% in the ZUMA-2 trial. They noted that selection bias could play a role in these outcomes, as well as the longer turnaround time included in a real-world setting.
Overall responses and complete responses (CRs) were similar between trials, although the 12-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were slightly decreased in the real-world trial, which may be in part due to an increase in non-relapse mortality. Additionally, patients with an intermediate– or low-risk simplified MCL International Prognostic Index (s-MIPI) score had a longer PFS vs those with a high-risk score.
Brexu-cel was approved by the FDA for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in July 2020 based on findings from ZUMA-2.2 The study included a total of 74 patients, 68 of whom received an infusion of brexu-cel. The treatment resulted in an overall response rate of 85%, including a CR rate of 59% in those who had undergone apheresis. In addition to the rate of CRS, 31% of patients experienced grade 3 or high neurologic adverse effects.
As notably little safety and efficacy data for brexu-cel have readout beyond the ZUMA-2 trial, investigators gathered real-world data from the European Early Access Program that allowed patients with relapsed/refractory MCL to undergo treatment with brexu-cel.
In the real-world study, a total of 39 patients underwent apheresis for brexu-cel. Of these patients, 8% experienced an initial manufacturing failure that necessitated a second or third apheresis to create the product. Two of these 3 patients did manage to receive an infusion. Among those who enrolled, 85% received brexu-cel infusions, and the remaining patients were unable to because of progressive disease, achieving a CR after bridging therapy, or infection.
The median patient age was 67 years, and most patients had a high-risk s-MIPI score at apheresis (55%) and advanced disease (88%). Thirty-six percent of patients had previously received autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Additionally, 24% of patients had blastoid morphology and 12% had TP53 mutations. The median follow-up post–brexu-cel infusion was 10.1 months.
In total, 26 patients received 1 bridging regimen and 6 received 2 following apheresis, with common bridging therapies including chemotherapy (n = 14) and ibrutinib (Imbruvica; n = 12). Following bridging therapy, 6% of patients achieved a CR, 16% had a partial response, 22% experienced stable disease, and 56% had progressive disease.
Although they acknowledged that brexu-cel appeared to be an effective salvage regimen in this patient population, they stated that the incidence of severe adverse effects was a point of concern and warrants further investigation.
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.
Highlighting Insights From the Marginal Zone Lymphoma Workshop
Clinicians outline the significance of the MZL Workshop, where a gathering of international experts in the field discussed updates in the disease state.