Communication and Education Are Key for CAR T-Cell Therapy in LBCL

Commentary
Video

Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

It is important that treating physicians and community oncologists remain in communication to optimally treat patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) using CAR T-cell therapy, according to David L. Porter, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2024 Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Meetings, Porter, the director of Cell Therapy and Transplant at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, discussed addressing various challenges associated with administering CAR T-cell therapy to patients with LBCL.

In a community oncologist roundtable that aimed to form appropriate CAR T-cell therapy consultation strategies for the aforementioned population, Porter and his colleagues captured the essence of their initiative with the slogan “If they RECUR, you should refer”, with the second “R” of RECUR meaning “receive patients returning post–CAR T-cell therapy”.

This portion of the slogan, Porter said, emphasized the necessity of treating physicians and community oncologists being prepared to treat and monitor patients following CAR T-cell therapy. He described how an educational suite at his institution may help oncologists properly manage toxicities during CAR T-cell therapy.

Transcript:

[CAR T-cell therapy] is a very new, highly specialized therapy, and it is important that [patients’] primary caregiver—their primary oncologist, for instance—is familiar with the therapy. They need to be familiar with the therapy that the patient received, the potential toxicities, and how to manage them moving forward after the initial treatment. That requires the treatment center that has the expertise to remain in communication with a patient's primary oncologist.

We think that's going to require a great deal of education and communication that may be different. For different centers, there may be different methods of communication and interaction, but it's critical. The last "R" in our acronym, RECUR, stood for "receive patients returning post–CAR T-cell therapy," highlighting the importance of that treating physician and community oncologists being ready to get the patient back into their practice. But [it's] also [a matter of] acknowledging that the care center has to be in communication with those physicians to help provide education. That can take many forms.

At my center at the University of Pennsylvania, we are developing an educational suite that we hope referring oncologists may take advantage of to learn about the toxicities, both acute and long-term, and how to manage these patients going forward after their treatment. It may be written material, peer-to-peer conversations, or educational meeting opportunities, and this will take many forms. It will be different for different physicians or care practices. We need to not just count on one method but take advantage of all the different methods at our disposal.

Reference

Riedell PA, Downs C, Boehmer L, Ebmeier J, Porter D, Williams A. If They RECUR, you should refer: a community oncologist patient ID roundtable summary. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2024;30(1):14-16. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2023.10.019

Related Videos
Increasing screening for younger individuals who are at risk of colorectal cancer may help mitigate the rising early incidence of this disease.
Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.
The use of proton therapy may offer a more specific depth charge compared with conventional radiation, according to Timothy Chen, MD.
ZAP-X may provide submillimeter accuracy when administering radiation to patients with brain tumors.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and higher PD-L1 expression may benefit from treatment with tislelizumab, according to Syma Iqbal, MD.
Quantifying disease volume to help identify potential recurrence following surgery may be a helpful advance, according to Sean Dineen, MD.
Sean Dineen, MD, highlights the removal of abdominal wall lesions and other surgical strategies that may help manage symptoms in patients with cancer.