OR WAIT null SECS
Energy therapies consist of interventions that are designed to interact with the biofield of a person. The concept of the biofield is based on the assumption that all living things have a natural flow of energy that is integral to their basic composition.
Energy therapies consist of interventions that are designed to interact with the biofield of a person. The concept of the biofield is based on the assumption that all living things have a natural flow of energy that is integral to their basic composition.[1–4] This principle stems from the interchangeability of energy and matter (E = mc2). The biofield of a person is part of the body, and it extends beyond the physical body in the form of energy. The concept of energy flowing through and around the physical body has a long-standing history and is the basis for various ancient healing practices and many complementary and alternative therapies.[1–4]
The biofield is often referred to, both historically and in the current literature, as chi, ki, qi, aura, prana, mana, and human energy field, among other terms.[1,3,6–9 ] Ki-energy, or the biofield, is described as “invisible psychophysical energy” and “energy, force, vitality, and strength.” The biofield is noted to be an integral part of human beings and nature. Healthcare modalities commonly utilized in Asian countries often interact with the biofield,[6,10] as the biofield is believed to influence both physical and mental health.[3,6,7,10] In Eastern tradition, the biofield is viewed from a holistic perspective rather than the mind–body dichotomy of Western tradition.[7,10]
Energy therapies/interventions are common practice for many cultural groups, including, but not limited to, Africans, Chinese,[10,12] Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, and Native Americans. Integration of energy therapies with other complementary therapies is increasing in Western cultures as well.[15–19] Complementary and alternative therapies that interact with the biofield include Healing Touch, Therapeutic Touch, Reiki, qi gong, acupuncture, acupressure, and others.
HOW DO THEY WORK?
The energy therapies are based on the assumption that physical, mental, emotional, and/or spiritual illness or injury will manifest in both the physical body and the biofield. The intent of energy therapies is to restore the balance of energy to the biofield, thus promoting health, healing, and general well-being. Energy therapies such as Healing Touch, Reiki, and Therapeutic Touch are practitioner-dependent. The therapist seeks to restore balance to the biofield by using his or her hands, with or without light touch on/over the body, to clear disturbances and facilitate a natural flow of energy. The facilitation of a balanced biofield is thought to optimize the body’s own ability to heal.[3,20]
HOW ARE THEY CURRENTLY USED?
The use of energy therapies potentially has very broad application, from promotion of relaxation, general health, and well-being, to treatment for symptoms of chronic conditions. The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) identifies anecdotal evidence supporting the efficacy of biofield therapies for a wide variety of health problems, such as asthma, hypertension, arthritis, acute pain, chronic pain, wound healing, stress, and anxiety. Many nurses trained in energy modalities will incorporate the practice as part of routine nursing care, such as directing or sending energy to a patient during a procedure or while assisting with activities of daily living, such as bathing.
Education and training in energy therapies are varied and usually involve multiple levels of classes and practice. For example, Healing Touch certification is offered through Healing Touch International, (a program endorsed by the American Holistic Nurses Association) or the Healing Touch Program, and it involves a rigorous program of study over a period of 2 years or more, as well as working with a mentor for at least 1 year, in addition to other requirements.
WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE RELATED TO ENERGY THERAPIES AND CANCER?
Energy therapies remain one of the most challenging and controversial areas of CAM therapies, as there is no accepted proof or biologic measure of the biofield. Several studies have been published evaluating various energy therapies. Unfortunately, many of the studies lack rigor. Therefore, there is a paucity of well-designed research evaluating energy therapies.
Case reports and pilot-level data have been published supporting the benefit of energy therapies in cancer care for palliation of cancer symptoms and treatment-related side effects. Areas that have shown promise include: Reiki for cancer-related fatigue, anxiety, overall improvement in quality of life, and decreased pain[23,24]; Therapeutic Touch for anxiety; and Healing Touch for mood disturbance, fatigue,[27–30] nausea, pain,[26,27] side-effect bother, vitality, and physical functioning and well-being.[27,30]
Jain and Mills recently published a “best evidence” synthesis in which they reviewed 66 published research studies on various energy therapies. Their review identifies evidence to support use of energy therapies in cancer patients for acute pain, but it found conflicting evidence for use in cancer patients in regard to fatigue, quality of life, nonacute pain, and physiologic response of relaxation. Overall, many of the studies evaluating energy therapies are methodologically weak. While a number of randomized placebo-controlled studies are being completed, additional large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are still needed.
Findings from two small randomized, placebo controlled studies of Healing Touch in women with cancer who were receiving radiation therapy showed similar outcomes in terms of impact on health-related quality of life. The first study, by Cook et al, evaluated Healing Touch in 62 women with breast and gynecological cancers, using the Short Form-36 health-related quality-of-life tool as an outcome measure. Healing Touch was given once weekly over a 4-week period, with a subsequent treatment 4 weeks later. There were significant improvements within both groups for various subscales, but the Healing Touch group had statistically greater improvement than the placebo group (P < .05) in the areas of physical functioning, pain, and vitality.
In the second study, Schnepper and colleagues evaluated Healing Touch in 40 women receiving radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer, using outcome measures from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT-B). Participants were randomized to Healing Touch or a placebo treatment, given once per week over a period of 4 to 6 weeks. Over the course of the study, women who received Healing Touch had significant improvement on the FACT-B, compared with those randomized to placebo treatment (P < .038). The Healing Touch Group had greater improvement on all subscales of the FACT-B vs the placebo group,
with significance on the physical-well-being subscale
(P < .020). The Healing Touch group also experienced less fatigue and less treatment-side-effect bother.
WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL RISKS?
Energy therapies have no known appreciable risks. Persons receiving an energy therapy sometimes report an increase in energy levels. Theoretically it is possible to overexert oneself after receiving an intervention, which may result in increased fatigue later. This has not been reported in any research findings, however.
WHAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE MESSAGE?
With the upsurge in public demand for complementary approaches to health and illness,[17,32] there is growing concern about the value, safety, and efficacy, of many integrative therapies. Definitive research into the benefits of energy therapies and biofield interventions is not yet available. Nevertheless, preliminary data suggest a high safety profile and potential symptom improvement. Energy therapies fit within the body of nursing knowledge and philosophy, because they have a focus of care that incorporates body, mind, and spirit. Thus, as more evidence becomes available, nurses should be poised to integrate energy therapies into patient care.
About Our Guest Editors
Debra Barton, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN, is chair of the Education Committee for the Society of Integrative Oncology (SIO) and a board member of SIO.
At the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, her program of research includes clinical trials with herbal and dietary supplements as well as mind-body therapies for symptom management in cancer survivors.
Susan Bauer-Wu, PhD, RN, FAAN, a highly regarded expert in mind-body medicine and psychoneuroimmunology, serves on the board of directors for SIO.
Her research and teaching interests at Emory University include mindfulness meditation and other bio-behavioral approaches for alleviation of symptoms and stress in the context of palliative care and in family and professional caregivers.
1. Brennan B: Hands of Light: A Guide to Healing Through the Human Energy Field. New York, Bantam Books, 1987.
2. Dossey B, Keegan L, Guzzetta C, et al (eds): Holistic Nursing: A Handbook for Nursing Practice, 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1995.
3. Hover-Kramer D, Mentgen J, Scandrett-Hibdon S: Healing Touch: A Resource Guide for Health Care Professionals. New York, Delmar Publishers, 1996.
4. Sierpina V: Integrative Health Care. Philadelphia, F. A. Davis, 2001.
5. The Center for History of Physics (1996â2010): E = mc2. Available at: http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/emc1.htm. Accessed on June 16, 2010.
6. Chang S: The nature of touch therapy related to Ki: Practitioner’s perspective. Nursing Health Sci 5:103â114, 2003.
7. Nagatomo N: Ki-energy: Invisible psychophysical energy. Asian Philosophy 12(3):173â181.
8. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Energy Medicine: An Overview. 2004. Available at: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/energymed.htm. Accessed on June 16, 2010.
9. Rubik B: The biofield hypothesis: Its biophysical basis and role in medicine. J Altern Complement Med 8(6):703â717, 2002.
10. Korngold E, Beinfield H: Chinese medicine and the mind. Explore 2(4):321â333, 2006.
11. Mpofu E, Harley D: Disability and rehabilitation in Zimbabwe: Lessons and implications for rehabilitation practices in the U.S. J Rehabilitation 68(4):26â33, 2002.
12. Cohen K: The way of qigong: The art and science of Chinese energy healing. New York, Ballantine Books, 1997.
13. Phan T, Silove, D: An overview of indigenous descriptions of mental phenomena and the range of traditional healing practices amongst the Vietnamese. Transcult Psychiatry 36(1):79â94, 1999.
14. Cohen K: Native American Medicine. Altern Ther Health Med 4(6):45â57, 1998.
15. Bausell R, Lee W, Berman B: Demographics and health-related correlates of visits to complementary and alternative medicine providers. Med Care 39(2):190â196, 2001.
16. Barnes P, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, et al: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data 343:1â20, 2004.
17. Eisenberg D, Davis R, Ettner S, et al: Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990â1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 280(18):1569â1575, 1998.
18. Kessler R, Davis R, Foster D, et al: Long-Term Trends in the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med 135(4):262â268, 2001.
19. Tindle H, Davis R, Phillips R, et al: Trends in use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by US Adults: 1997â2002. Altern Ther Health Med 11(1):42â49, 2005.
20. Mentgen J: Healing Touch. Nurs Clin North Am 36(1):143â157, 2001.
21. Healing Touch International: Healing Touch Certificate Program. 2006. Available at: http://www.healingtouchinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=147&Itemid=448. Accessed on June 16, 2010.
22. Healing Touch Program: Healing Touch Program/Classes. Available at: http://www.healingtouchprogram.com/classes/classprogram-information. Accessed on June 16, 2010.
23. Tsang K, Carlson L, Olson K: Pilot crossover trial of Reiki vesus rest for treating cancer-related fatigue. Integr Cancer Ther 6:25â35, 2007.
24. Olson K, Hanson J, Michaud M: A phase II trial of Reiki for the management of pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Sympt Manage 26:990â997, 2003.
25. Samarel N, Fawcett J, Davis M, et al: Effects of dialogue and Therapeutic Touch on preoperative and post-operative experiences of breast cancer surgery: An exploratory study. Oncol Nurs Forum 25:1369â1376, 1998.
26. Post-White J, Kinney M, Savik K, et al: Therapeutic massage and Healing Touch improve symptoms in cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 2(4):332â344, 2003.
27. Cook C, Guerrerio J, Slater V: Healing Touch and quality of life in women receiving radiation treatment for cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Altern Ther Health Med 10(3):34â41, 2004.
28. Danhauer S, Tooze J, Holder P, et al: Healing Touch as a supportive intervention for adult acute leukemia patients: A pilot investigation of effects on distress and symptoms. J Soc Integ Onc 6(3):89â97, 2008.
29. Jain S, Distefan J, Pavlik D, et al: Biofield vs mock healing for cancer-related fatigue, immune and hormonal function: Effects of treatment guess on outcomes (abstract). Presented at the 6th Annual International Conference of the Society for Integrative Oncology. New York Academy of Medicine, New York, November 12â13, 2009.
30. Schnepper L: Healing Touch and Health-Related Quality of life in Women with Breast Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy (doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 2009. Pub no. 3373882.
Available at: http://gradworks.umi.com/33/73/3373882.html. Accessed on June 16, 2010.
31. Jain S, Mills P: Biofield therapies: Helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis. Int J Behav Med 17:1â16, 2010.
32. Stasen L: The silent health care revolution: The rising demand for complementary medicine. Nursing Econ 17(5):246â256, 1999.