Gallbladder and Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Update, Part 2

July 1, 2004

Gallbladder carcinoma and carcinoma of the bile ducts are relativelyrare cancers in the United States. These cancers are often diagnosedin an advanced stage due to their nonspecific symptomatologyand until recently have been associated with a dismal prognosis. Recentadvances in imaging and surgical techniques along with emergingoptions in palliative chemotherapy have improved the outlook inthese cancers. While complete surgical resection remains the only hopeof cure in both these cancers, palliative biliary decompression and chemotherapyresult in substantial improvement in quality of life. Part 1 ofthis review, which appeared in last month’s issue, provided a relevantand comprehensive update of molecular pathology, imaging modalities,and surgical care. In part 2, we examine palliative care and systemictherapy in gallbladder and biliary tract carcinomas, as well asthe use of liver transplantation in the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas.These strategies are of relevance to internists as well as oncologistscaring for these patients.

ABSTRACT: Gallbladder carcinoma and carcinoma of the bile ducts are relatively rare cancers in the United States. These cancers are often diagnosed in an advanced stage due to their nonspecific symptomatology and until recently have been associated with a dismal prognosis. Recent advances in imaging and surgical techniques along with emerging options in palliative chemotherapy have improved the outlook in these cancers. While complete surgical resection remains the only hope of cure in both these cancers, palliative biliary decompression and chemotherapy result in substantial improvement in quality of life. Part 1 of this review, which appeared in last month’s issue, provided a relevant and comprehensive update of molecular pathology, imaging modalities, and surgical care. In part 2, we examine palliative care and systemic therapy in gallbladder and biliary tract carcinomas, as well as the use of liver transplantation in the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas. These strategies are of relevance to internists as well as oncologists caring for these patients.

Gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma-carcinoma of the bile ducts-are relatively rare cancers in the United States, but have long been associated with a dismal prognosis. Although complete surgical resection is the only hope for cure in both diseases, advances in diagnostic imaging techniques permit earlier diagnosis and have led to improved survival in recent years. The search for appropriate neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments to improve survival and decrease recurrence rates is ongoing.

In the June issue of ONCOLOGY, part 1 of this two-part review summarized improvements in preoperative imaging, staging, and curative surgery. In this concluding part, we address the expanded treatment options available in terms of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and palliative care, all of which are improving the outlook for patients diagnosed with these cancers.

Adjuvant Treatment

Gallbladder Carcinoma

Few prospective randomized trials have assessed adjuvant therapy in this rare tumor group. The available data derive from small phase II trials in which patients undergoing such treatment have been compared with historical controls.

The only phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy included 508 patients with resected gallbladder (n = 140), bile duct (n = 139), ampulla of Vater (n = 56), and pancreatic carcinoma (n = 173).[1] Patients were randomized to surgery alone or with MF (mitomycin [Mutamycin]/fluorouracil [5-FU]). The MF group received mitomycin, 6 mg/m2, at the time of surgery and two courses of 5-FU at 310 mg/m2 x 5 days in the postoperative period followed by oral 5-FU, 100 mg/m2/d, from postoperative week 5 until recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival rate (for gallbladder carcinoma patients) favored adjuvant chemotherapy (20.3% vs 11.6%, P = .02), and the 5-year overall survival rate was also improved (26% vs 14.4%, P = .03). There were no significant differences in survival or disease-free survival rates in the other cancer groups.

A meta-analysis of publications concerning the role of radiation therapy in gallbladder carcinoma from 1974 to 2000 reported a slight improvement in survival after adjuvant or palliative radiotherapy.[2] The strongest benefit was for tumors resected with only microscopic residual tissue. This report recommended an intraoperative boost of 15 Gy to the residual lesion or tumor bed with additional postoperative externalbeam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 45 to 50 Gy.

Adjuvant chemoradiation consisting of concurrent 5-FU plus EBRT in 21 resected patients with gallbladder carcinoma was associated with a 5-year survival rate of 64% in the completely resected (negative-margins) group, compared with 33% associated with surgery alone in historical controls.[3]

Although confirmatory results from large randomized prospective trials are lacking, it is reasonable to offer patients with advanced gallbladder disease postoperative radiotherapy given the low morbidity of radiation compared with the high local recurrence rates and poor survival associated with surgery alone.Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and mitomycin may be recommended for resected gallbladder cancer.[1]

Cholangiocarcinoma

TABLE 1

Adjuvant Radiation/Chemoradiation in Gallbladder/Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Only 20% to 30% of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma are eligible for potentially curative (R0) resection. The median survival associated with an R0 resection is significantly better (22 months) than that of a palliative resection (10.7 months).[4] Small studies suggest that neoadjuvant therapy consisting of chemotherapy, radiation, chemoradiation, or photodynamic therapy may increase rates of curative resection. However, the small size of these experiences precludes any definitive conclusion.[4,5] Cameron et al reported the Johns Hopkins experience with 96 proximal cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing either curative or palliative surgery and 66% receiving postoperative radiotherapy. No survival advantage was associated with postoperative radiotherapy in the group undergoing curative resection; however, radiation improved survival in those undergoing palliative surgery (R1 or R2 resection).[ 6] Table 1 summarizes some of the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment experiences in gallbladder and cholangiocarcinoma.[1,3,4,7-10]

Liver Transplantation for Biliary Tumors

TABLE 2

Liver Transplantation for Biliary Tumors

The prospect of liver transplantation as a cure for cholangiocarcinoma is appealing given encouraging results of transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis with incidental, small (< 1 cm) cholangiocarcinomas (Table 2).[11-16] Unfortunately, the recurrence rate is high within the first few years after transplantation.

Using life table analysis, projected 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival estimates of 72%, 48%, and 23% were reported for 207 patients who underwent liver transplantation for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.[ 11,12] The poor long-term survival rates were secondary to high postoperative mortality and a high incidence of recurrence (51%). The majority of recurrences (85%) occurred within 2 years of transplant. Sites of recurrence were most commonly in the allograft (47%) and in the lung (30%). No prognostic markers were identified that could help with patient selection.

To decrease the rate of posttransplant recurrence, preoperative chemoradiation with 5-FU has been attempted. In a small series, 11 patients successfully completed this therapy, and at a follow-up of 44 months, only 1 had relapsed.[17] Transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation with infusional 5-FU and biliary brachytherapy has been evaluated in 17 patients.[ 18] Five patients had tumor progression during the neoadjuvant phase, precluding transplantation. Among the 11 who completed the protocol, 45% were alive without tumor recurrence at a median follow-up of 7.5 years.

The high risk of recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma after transplantation precludes recommending this procedure as a routine treatment for biliary tract tumors. That said, it seems reasonable to consider liver transplantation for patients with cholangiocarcinomas less than 1 cm.[11,18,19]

Palliative Treatment

Biliary Decompression

Malignant biliary obstruction results in much of the morbidity of biliary tract and gallbladder carcinomas. Relief of biliary obstruction palliates symptoms including jaundice and associated pruritis, pain, and weight loss.

Quality-of-life parameters have been evaluated in 50 patients undergoing endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction. Weight loss and hyperbilirubinemia were strongly predictive of poor quality of life.[20] Successful biliary drainage was associated with improvement in quality of life, although less so in those with baseline bilirubin over 13 mg/dL. Patients with malignant biliary tract obstruction attain significant improvement in emotional, cognitive, and global health scores after endoscopic stent placement.[21]

Biliary decompression can be achieved with equivalent efficacy by operative biliary-enteric bypass or endoscopic or percutaneous stenting of the biliary tree.[22,23] Surgical decompression is recommended during an unsuccessful attempt at curative resection or in patients in whom nonsurgical decompression is not feasible. Self-expanding metallic stents produce a longer duration of patency-8 to 10 months, compared with 4 to 5 months using polyethylene endoprostheses.[24] Survival expectations may therefore be used to guide stent selection. Reocclusion is usually secondary to tumor ingrowth or sludging.[25]

With improvement in radiologic techniques, the results of percutaneous stenting are as good if not superior to endoscopic stenting.[26] Percutaneous procedures may be preferable in type II-IV hilar cholangiocarcinomas, as endoscopic drainage in these cases is often difficult and results in high rates of cholangitis due to inadequate drainage.[27,28]

To improve the duration of stent patency and overall survival, adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy has been tried. In a study in 32 patients, intraluminal brachytherapy with iridium (Ir)-192 along with stent insertion was found to yield 2-year survival rates of up to 27% in those with Klatskin's tumor and up to 50% in those with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, along with a stent patency duration of more than 1 year.[29] Another study in 22 patients had similar results, with mean stent patency duration of 19.5 months after treatment with Ir-192.[30] The significance of these findings is unclear given the potential patient selection bias associated with small sample size.

Palliative Chemotherapy

Patients with cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder carcinoma typically present late in the course of their disease and often are not candidates for curative surgical resection. In cases where surgical intervention is not warranted, palliative chemotherapy has been used to diminish symptoms and possibly to extend survival.

Only one large randomized trial has addressed the role of palliative chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Glimelius et al randomized patients with pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer to a regimen of 5-FU/leucovorin with or without etoposide, or best supportive care, and evaluated these strategies for disease response and quality-of-life indicators. Of 90 enrolled patients, 37 had advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Marked although short-term improvements in survival (6.5 vs 2.5 mo) and quality of life (measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 instrument) were noted in the treatment group, establishing a role for palliative treatment in unresectable disease.[31,32]

Several phase I and II trials, as well as numerous case and series reports, have assessed the efficacy and toxicity profiles of various chemotherapy regimens in the palliative treatment of biliary tract tumors. A variety of single-agent and multiagent chemotherapy regimens have yielded modest results in palliating patients with advanced carcinomas. Response rates have ranged from 0% to 47%. No consensus has been reached regarding standard of care.

Many drugs including 5-FU/leucovorin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), carboplatin (Paraplatin), mitomycin C (Mutamycin), doxorubicin, interferon-alfa 2b (Intron A), gemcitabine (Gemzar), epirubicin (Ellence), capecitabine (Xeloda), irinotecan (Camptosar), and docetaxel (Taxotere) continue to be evaluated alone and in combination for the treatment of advanced biliary cancer. While the results of these phase II trials do not permit conclusive recommendations for a particular regimen, they do indicate that progression of advanced carcinoma of the biliary tract can in many cases be temporarily controlled. Partial responses consistently ranging from 10% to 30% and disease stabilization rates from 10% to 50%, as well as improving median time to progression and median overall survival time, indicate that investigation of palliative treatment warrants continued attention.

This section summarizes recent phase I and II trials in the management of biliary tract tumors. Small sample sizes in each trial and the small number of trials preclude the development of statistically significant findings in cross-study analyses. Furthermore, studies seldom examine identical dosing and delivery schedules, making cross-study comparison difficult. However, analyzing the results of these trials can provide guidance in the clinical management of patients and suggest new avenues for investigation.

5-FU/Leucovorin

Either in combination or as a single agent, 5-FU has been used in the management of biliary carcinomas for almost 30 years. Single-agent studies have met with variable success. From 1974 to 1994, four small studies (enrolling between 7 and 30 patients) investigated the efficacy of singleagent 5-FU. Response rates ranged from 0% to 24% in a total of 78 patients.[31]

TABLE 3

Trial of Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Treatments

Table 3 summarizes the results of the Glimelius et al randomized trial and three additional 5-FU/leucovorin trials.[32-35] Response rates in these trials appear better than those reported for 5-FU alone.[32] The toxicity of 5-FU/leucovorin regimens is tolerable and easily managed. Grade 3/4 toxicities have included mucositis, diarrhea, hematologic toxicity, asthenia, and abdominal pain.

5-FU Combination Regimens

TABLE 4

Fluorouracil Combination Regimens

Given the poor responses with 5-FU/leucovorin alone, investigators have evaluated 5-FU-based combinations in a number of phase I and II clinical trials. These trials are summarized in Table 4.[36-47] Outcomes have been mixed, with partial response rates ranging between 0% and 64% and disease stabilization rates from 0% to 50%. Complete responses have been rare. Reported median time to progression ranges from 3 to 10 months, while reported median survival ranges from 5 to 32 months.

5-FU and Mitomycin-Single-agent mitomycin has been used in several trials, with response rates ranging from 0% to 47%.[31] The FAM regimen (5-FU, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], mitomycin) demonstrated a disease control rate (complete and partial responses plus disease stabilization) of 81%.[36] Unfortunately, other mitomycin-based trials have shown unacceptable toxicity. A trial of mitomycin, 10 mg/m2 every 8 weeks, together with weekly 5-FU at 2,600 mg/m2 plus leucovorin at 150 mg/m2 was stopped after treatment-related deaths exceeded 10% in the first 25 patients.[48] Given the potential toxicity of mitomycin and the availability of other agents, further investigation of mitomycin regimens is probably not warranted.

5-FU and Platinum-Cisplatin has minimal activity as a single agent against biliary tract carcinomas.[31] The combination of 5-FU and cisplatin has been assessed in several trials with variable success. An overall response rate of 24% was attained in a 25-patient trial evaluating 5-FU, 1,000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion daily for 5 days, plus a 1-hour infusion of cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 2.[37] The PIAF regimen (cisplatin, interferon alfa-2b, doxorubicin, 5-FU) produced response rates of 35% and 9.5% in 19 gallbladder carcinoma patients and 22 cholangiocarcinoma patients, respectively. Although the median survival of 14 months was encouraging, the significant toxicity profile of PIAF, which included grade 3/4 neutropenia (41%), nausea and vomiting (34%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and anemia (15%), precludes future use.[38] In addition, it is impossible to discern the contribution, if any, of interferon in this regimen.

Gemcitabine as a Single Agent

TABLE 5

Trials of Gemcitabine as a Single Agent

Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine analog related to cytarabine with demonstrated success in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.[49] Hence, clinical investigators were eager to develop this agent in the treatment of biliary tract neoplasms. A number of small clinical trials summarized in Table 5 have examined the palliative effects of gemcitabine on biliary tract carcinomas.[42,50-57]

In general, gemcitabine therapy has produced moderate disease-control rates, time to progression, and median survival. These trials have shown objective response rates up to 60%, with disease-control rates ranging from 50% to 93%.[42,57,58] Clinical benefit with relief of tumor-related symptoms and weight gain has also been attained in more than 60% of evaluable patients.[51,52]

A unique schedule consisting of larger gemcitabine doses (2,200 mg/m2 as a 30-minute infusion every 2 weeks for 6 months) was administered to 30 patients with biliary tract tumors. The partial response and disease stabilization rates were 22% and 44%, respectively. Median time to progression and median overall survival were 5.6 and 11.5 months.[57] The tolerance was excellent, with minimal myelosupression despite the increase in dosage. These results with gemcitabine are comparable to, or better than, those achieved with 5-FU/leucovorin. Single-agent gemcitabine treatments are remarkably well tolerated and result in encouraging progression-free and overall survivals. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity is rarely observed, with thrombocytopenia the most common event, affecting 0% to 18% of patients.

Gemcitabine in Combination Regimens

TABLE 6

Trials of Gemcitabine in Combination Regimens

Table 6 summarizes the dosing schedules and outcomes of 12 phase II trials of gemcitabine-based combinations.[55,59-73] Gemcitabine has been combined with 5-FU, docetaxel, irinotecan, cisplatin, and capecitabine. The efficacy of combination treatments has varied, but some of these phase II trials have shown encouraging activity as compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Several of these trials have been associated with improved survival outcomes of 11 months. However, in order for these regimens to be acceptable in clinical practice, they need to demonstrate tolerable toxicity profiles and reproducible survival benefits.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin-Gemcitabine/cisplatin regimens have been well tolerated with few grade 4 toxicities. Response rates have ranged from 47.6% to 57% and disease stabilization rates from 28% to 41%.[60-62] The efficacy of this combination needs to be further assessed in larger randomized trials.

Gemcitabine and Capecitabine-Single-agent capecitabine at a dosage of 2,000 mg/m2/d has been evaluated in a study of 26 patients with biliary and gallbladder cancers.[74] A 50% response rate and 1-year overall survival rate of 70% was attained. These encouraging outcomes prompted studies of capecitabine-based combination regimens. In one such trial, gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine at 650 mg/m2 po bid on days 1 to 14 was administered every 21 days.[63] Of 15 patients assessable for response, 33% attained a partial response and 33% had stable disease. The regimen was well tolerated, with less than 5% of patients developing grade 3/4 toxicity.

Gemcitabine and Irinotecan-The combination of gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days has been evaluated in a small trial including 13 patients.[64] Objective responses were observed in 18.2% of patients, with stable disease in 54.5%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were rare and tolerable. The regimen appears to be feasible in the treatment of biliary cancers, but it is not clear whether irinotecan adds appreciably to treatment with gemcitabine alone.[64]

Gemcitabine and 5-FU-Two trials have examined the efficacy of gemcitabine/ 5-FU combinations for the treatment of biliary tract tumors. Gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU at 500 mg/m2 once a week for 3 weeks on a 4-week cycle has been evaluated in nine patients; three experienced a partial response.[59] Gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 in combination with 5-FU/leucovorin has been evaluated in 42 patients.[65] Patients were treated on days 1, 8, and 15 of 4-week cycles, and partial responses were attained in 9.5% of patients. Median time to progression and median overall survival were 3.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. The combination was well tolerated, with few grade 3/4 toxicities. Based on these data, however, the combination of 5-FU and gemcitabine appears to have little benefit.

Gemcitabine and Docetaxel-On the basis of the activity and safety profile of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer, a phase II study of this combination administered weekly was conducted in 43 patients with unresectable biliary tract cancers.[66] A 9% partial response rate, 53% disease stabilization, and median overall survival of 11 months were attained with this welltolerated combination. The regimen is undergoing further investigation in a randomized multicenter study.

Gemcitabine, 5-FU/Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Cisplatin-The novel combination known as G-FLIP (gemcitabine, 5-FU bolus plus infusion, leucovorin, irinotecan, and cisplatin [Platinol]) makes use of clinical evidence of known sequence-dependent synergy among these four drugs, while avoiding known sequence-dependent toxicity.[75] A phase I study included five patients with gallbladder cancer; three achieved a partial response.[67] The regimen was welltolerated, with largely hematologic toxicities consisting of anemia (9%), thrombocytopenia (9%), neutropenia (19%), and neutropenic fever (14%). These results require further evaluation in a phase II study in gallbladder cancer patients.

Other Gemcitabine-Based Combinatons-Some multidrug combinations, especially those with cisplatin and gemcitabine, show improved activity compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Most combinations have been well-tolerated and have produced improved response rates, but survival outcomes from randomized multicenter trials are lacking. Thus, while activity and survival outcomes are encouraging, definite confirmatory randomized trials are warranted before they can be recommended outside of a clinical trial.

New Anticancer Agents

TABLE 7

New Anticancer Agents Being Studied in Advanced Biliary and Gallbladder Cancers

Table 7 shows the results of clinical trials with several new anticancer agents being studied in advanced biliary and gallbladder cancers.[74,76-78] Dowlati et al reported an 11.1% partial response and 33.3% disease stabilization in 27 patients treated with the antitumor antibiotic rebeccamycin analog.[76] Rebeccamycin analog has both topoisomerase I and II activity and DNA intercalating properties. The 6-month survival rate in this study was 76%, with a median survival of 10 months. Grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of neutropenia (52%), thrombocytopenia and anemia (28%), and neutropenic fever (11.1%).[76]

An ongoing study by Philip et al involves 30 patients with advanced biliary carcinoma being treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib (Tarceva). To date, only toxicity data are available and only 4% grade 3/4 toxicity with nausea/ vomiting has been noted. Efficacy data are pending.[77]

Ueno et al recently reported preliminary data on the use of S-1 in 19 patients with advanced biliary and gallbladder cancers.[78] S-1 is a new oral anticancer agent that contains tegafur (a prodrug of 5-FU), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor), and potassium oxonate (orotate phosphoribosyl transferase inhibitor). A total of 21% of patients treated with 40 mg/m2 bid for 28 consecutive days in 6-week cycles experienced a partial response and 47.4% had disease stabilization, with few grade 3/4 toxicities. Median overall survival was over 8 months. S-1 seems to be welltolerated and active in this disease and will be examined in a larger phase II trial.

Conclusions

Complete surgical resection is the only hope for cure in both gallbladder and cholangiocarcinomas. While a simple cholecystectomy is usually curative for T1 gallbladder tumors, radical cholecystectomy is required for T2 and more invasive lesions. Radical resection should be considered for stage I-III gallbladder carcinomas. Complete tumor resection for cholangiocarcinoma, including partial hepatectomy for hilar carcinomas, is necessary to achieve long-term survival.

Adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent 5-FU and mitomycin may improve survival, especially in gallbladder tumors resected with microscopic residual disease. Large randomized prospective studies on the use of adjuvant therapy are lacking, and any recommendations are based on small studies and metaanalyses. Liver transplantation can provide long-term survivals for cholangiocarcinomas less than 1 cm in diameter but cannot be recommended routinely for all biliary tract tumors due to the high rate of recurrence and postoperative mortality.

Although advances in imaging techniques have improved preoperative diagnosis, most patients are diagnosed late and are not candidates for curative resection. Palliation in these patients includes relief of biliary obstruction with endoscopic or percutaneous stent placement as well as palliative chemotherapy, which improves both survival and quality of life. Gemcitabine probably offers the most favorable single-agent profile with respect to disease response and toxicity. Trials of gemcitabine/cisplatin combinations offer encouraging results and a tolerable toxicity profile. Other combinations including gemcitabine plus capecitabine or docetaxel seem promising but await confirmatory data from larger trials. Until conclusive disease-specific phase III data become available, single-agent therapy with gemcitabine is a reasonable standard of care for palliation of biliary tract tumors.

Financial Disclosure:Dr. Kozuch receives grant support from Pfizer (irinotecan) and Sanofi-Synthelabo.

References:

1.

Takada T, Amano H, Yasuda H, et al: Ispostoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful forgallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenterprospective randomized controlled trial in patientswith resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma.Cancer 95:1685-1695, 2002.

2.

Houry S, Barrier A, Huguier M: Irradiationtherapy for gallbladder carcinoma: Recentadvances. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg8:518-524, 2001.

3.

Kresl JJ, Schild SE, Henning GT, et al:Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy withconcurrent chemotherapy in the managementof gallbladder carcinoma. Int J Radiat OncolBiol Phys 52:167-175, 2002.

4.

McMasters KM, Tuttle TM, Leach SD, etal: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for extrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 174:605-608, 1997.

5.

Wiedmann M, Caca K, Berr F, et al:Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy as a newapproach to treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma:A phase II pilot study. Cancer 97:2783-2790,2003.

6.

Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Zinner MJ, et al:Management of proximal cholangiocarcinomasby surgical resection and radiotherapy. Am JSurg 159:91-97, 1990.

7.

Urego M, Flickinger JC, Carr BI: Radiotherapyand multimodality management ofcholangiocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys 44:121-126, 1999.

8.

Todoroki T, Kawamoto T, Otsuka M, etal: Benefits of combining radiotherapy withaggressive resection for stage IV gallbladdercancer. Hepatogastroenterology 46:1585-1591,1999.

9.

de Aretxabala X, Roa I, Burgos L, et al:Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the treattreatmentof gallbladder cancer. Am Surg 65:241-246, 1999.

10.

Mahe M, Stampfli C, Romestaing P, etal: Primary carcinoma of the gallbladder: Potentialfor external radiation therapy. RadiotherOncol 33:204-208, 1994.

11.

Gow PJ, Chapman RW: Liver transplantationfor primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver20:97-103, 2000.

12.

Meyer CG, Penn I, James L: Liver transplantationfor cholangiocarcinoma: Results in207 patients. Transplantation 69:1633-1637,2000.

13.

Pichlmayr R, Weimann A, Tusch G, etal: Indications and role of liver transplantationfor malignant tumors. Oncologist 2:164-170,1997.

14.

Sudan D, DeRoover A, Chinnakotla S,et al: Radiochemotherapy and transplantationallow long-term results for unresectable hilarcholangiocarcinoma. Am J Transplant 2:774-779, 2002.

15.

Iwatsuki S, Todo S, Marsh JW, et al:Treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma(Klatskin tumors) with hepatic resection ortransplantation. J Am Coll Surg 187:358-364,1998.

16.

Hassoun Z, Gores GJ, Rosen CB: Preliminaryexperience with liver transplantationin selected patients with unresectable hilarcholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am11:909-921, 2002.

17.

De Vreede I, Steers JL, Burch PA, et al:Prolonged disease-free survival after orthotopicliver transplantation plus adjuvantchemoradiation for cholangiocarcinoma. LiverTranspl 6:309-316, 2000.

18.

Goss JA, Shackleton CR, Farmer DG, etal: Orthotopic liver transplantation for primarysclerosing cholangitis. A 12-year single centerexperience. Ann Surg 225:472-481, 1997.

19.

Wiesner RH: Liver transplantation forprimary sclerosing cholangitis: Timing, outcome,impact of inflammatory bowel diseaseand recurrence of disease. Best Pract Res ClinGastroenterol 15:667-680, 2001.

20.

Abraham NS, Barkun JS, Barkun AN, etal: Palliation of malignant biliary obstruction:Prospective trial examining impact on qualityof life. Gastrointest Endosc 56:835-841, 2002.

21.

Luman W, Cull A, Palmer KR: Qualityof life in patients stented for malignant biliaryobstructions. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol9:481-484, 1997.

22.

Shepherd HA, Royle G, Ross AP, et al:Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in the palliationof malignant obstruction of the distalcommon bile duct: A randomized trial. Br JSurg 75:1166-1168, 1988.

23.

Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, etal: Randomized trial of endoscopic stentingversus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet 344:1655-1660, 1994.

24.

Davids PH; Groen AK; Rauws EA, etal: Randomized trial of self-expanding metalstents versus polyethylene stents for distalmalignant biliary obstruction. Lancet340:1488-1492, 1992.

25.

Kim HS, Lee DK, Kim HG, et al: Featuresof malignant biliary obstruction affectingthe patency of metallic stents: A multicenterstudy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:359-365, 2002.

26.

Pinol V, Castells A, Bordas JM, et al:Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versusendoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses fortreating malignant biliary obstruction: Randomizedclinical trial. Radiology 225:27-34, 2002.

27.

England RE, Martin DF: Endoscopic andpercutaneous intervention in malignant obstructivejaundice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol19:381-387,1996.

28.

Lameris JS, Stoker J, Dees J, et al: Nonsurgicalpalliative treatment of patients withmalignant biliary obstruction-the place ofendoscopic and percutaneous drainage. ClinRadiol 38:603-608, 1987.

29.

Bruha R, Petrtyl J, Kubecova M, et al:Intraluminal brachytherapy and selfexpandablestents in nonresectable biliary malignancies-the question of long-term palliation.Hepatogastroenterology 48:631-637, 2001.

30.

Eschelman DJ, Shapiro MJ, Bonn J, etal: Malignant biliary duct obstruction: Longtermexperience with Gianturco stents and combined-modality radiation therapy. Radiology200:717-724, 1996.

31.

Hejna M, Pruckmayer M, Raderer M:The role of chemotherapy and radiation in themanagement of biliary cancer: A review of theliterature. Eur J Cancer 34:977-986, 1998.

32.

Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjoden PO, etal: Chemotherapy improves survival and qualityof life in advanced pancreatic and biliarycancer. Ann Oncol 7:593-600, 1996.

33.

Chen JS, Jan YY, Lin YC, et al: Weekly24 h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil andleucovorin in patients with biliary tract carcinomas.Anticancer Drugs 9:393-397,1998.

34.

Choi CW, Choi KI, Seo JH, et al: Effectsof 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in thetreatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas.Am J Clin Oncol 23:425-428, 2000.

35.

Malik IA, Aziz Z: Prospective evaluationof efficacy and toxicity of 5-FU and folinicacid (Mayo Clinic Regimen) in patientswith advanced cancer of the gallbladder. Am JClin Oncol 26:124-126, 2003.

36.

Harvey JH, Smith FP, Schein PS: 5-Fluorouracil,mitomycin, and doxorubicin (FAM)in carcinoma of the biliary tract. J Clin Oncol2:1245-1248, 1984.

37.

Ducreux M, Rougier P, Fandi A, et al:Effective treatment of advanced biliary tractcarcinoma using 5-fluorouracil continuous infusionwith cisplatin. Ann Oncol 9:653-656,1998.

38.

Patt YZ, Hassan MM, Lozano RD, et al:Phase II trial of cisplatin, interferon alpha-2b,doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil for biliary tractcancer. Clin Cancer Res 7:3375-3380, 2001.

39.

Kajanti M, Pyrhonen S: Epirubicin-sequentialmethotrexate-5-fluorouracil-leucovorintreatment in advanced cancer of the extrahepaticbiliary system. A phase II study. Am JClin Oncol 17:223-226, 1994.

40.

Ellis PA, Norman A, Hill A, et al:Epirubicin, cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) (ECF) in hepatobiliary tumours.Eur J Cancer 31A:1594-1598, 1995.

41.

Gebbia V, Majello E, Testa A, et al: Treatmentof advanced adenocarcinomas of the exocrinepancreas and the gallbladder with 5-fluorouracil,high dose levofolinic acid and oralhydroxyurea on a weekly schedule. Results ofa multicenter study of the Southern Italy OncologyGroup (G.O.I.M.). Cancer 78:1300-1307, 1996.

42.

Raderer M, Hejna MH, Valencak JB, etal: Two consecutive phase II studies of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/mitomycin C and ofgemcitabine in patients with advanced biliarycancer. Oncology 56:177-180, 1999.

43.

Eckel F, Lersch C, Assmann G, et al:Phase II trial of low-dose cyclophosphamide,leucovorin, high-dose 5-fluorouracil 24-hourcontinuous infusion and tamoxifen in advancedbiliary tract cancer. Ann Oncol 11:762-763,2000.

44.

Chen JS, Lin YC, Jan YY, et al: MitomycinC with weekly 24-h infusion of highdose5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patientswith biliary tract and periampullar carcinomas.Anticancer Drugs 12:339-343, 2001.

45.

Melichar B, Cerman J Jr, Dvorak J, etal: Regional chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers-a single institution experience.Hepatogastroenterology 49:900-906, 2002.

46.

Taieb J, Mitry E, Boige V, et al: Optimizationof 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combinationchemotherapy with a new schedule ofleucovorin, 5-FU and cisplatin (LV5FU-P regimen)in patients with biliary tract carcinoma.Ann Oncol 3:1192-1196, 2002.

47.

Nehls O, Klump B, Arkenau HT, et al:Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin foradvanced biliary system adenocarcinomas: Aprospective phase II trial. Br J Cancer 87:702-704, 2002.

48.

Chen JS, Lin YC, Jan YY, et al: MitomycinC with weekly 24-h infusion of highdose5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patientswith biliary tract and periampullar carcinomas.Anticancer Drugs 12:339-343, 2001.

49.

Burris HA, Moore MJ, Anderson J: Improvementsin survival and clinical benefit withgemcitabine as first-line therapy for patientswith advanced pancreas cancer: A randomizedtrial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403-2413, 1997.

50.

Metzger J, Sauerbruch T, Ko Y, et al:Phase II trial of gemcitabine in gallbladder andbiliary tract cancers. Onkologie 21:232-234,1998.

51.

Kubicka S, Rudolph KL, Tietze MK, etal: Phase II study of systemic gemcitabine chemotherapyfor advanced unresectablehepatobiliary carcinomas.Hepatogastroenterology 48:783-789, 2001.

52.

Dobrila-Dintinjana R, Kovac D, DepoloA, et al: Gemcitabine in patients withnonresectable cancer of the biliary system oradvanced gallbladder cancer (abstract). Am JGastroenterol 95:2476, 2000.

53.

Valencak J, Kornek GV, Raderer M:Gemcitabine for the treatment of advanced biliarytract carcinomas: Evaluation of two differentdose regimens. Onkologie 22:498-501,1999.

54.

Arroyo G, Gallardo J, Rubio B:Gemcitabine (GEM) in advanced biliary tractcancer (ABTC) experience from Chile and Argentinain phase II trials (abstract 626). ProcAm Soc Clin Oncol 20:157a, 2001.

55.

Gebbia V, Giuliani F, Maiello E, et al:Treatment of inoperable and/or metastatic biliarytree carcinomas with single-agentgemcitabine or in combination with levofolinicacid and infusional fluorouracil: Results of amulticenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol19:4089-4091, 2001.

56.

Lin MH, Chen JS, Chen HH, et al: Aphase II trial of gemcitabine in the treatmentof advanced bile duct and periampullary carcinomas.Chemotherapy 49:154-158, 2003.

57.

Penz M, Kornek GV, Raderer M, et al:Phase II trial of two-weekly gemcitabine inpatients with advanced biliary tract cancer. AnnOncol 12:183-186, 2001.

58.

Scheithauer W: Review of gemcitabinein biliary tract carcinoma. Semin Oncol29(suppl 20):40-45, 2002.

59.

Murad AM, Guimarães RC, Aragão BC,et al: Phase II trial of the use of gemcitabineand 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advancedpancreatic and biliary tract Cancer. Am J ClinOncol 26:151-154, 2003.

60.

Carraro S, Servienti PJ, Bruno MF:Gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advancedor metastatic gallbladder and bile duct adenocarcinomas(abstract 2333). Proc Am Soc ClinOncol vol 20, 2001.

61.

Doval DC, Sekhon JS, Fuloria J:Gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapynaive,unresectable gallbladder cancer: A largemulticenter, phase II study (abstract 622). ProcAm Soc Clin Oncol 20:156a, 2001.

62.

Reyes-Vidal J, Gallardo J, Yanez E, etal: Gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (C) in thetreatment of patients (pts) with unresectable ormetastatic gallbladder cancer: Results of thephase II GOCCHI study 2000-13 (abstract1095). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:273, 2003.

63.

Knox JJ, Hedley D, Oza A, et al: PhaseII trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine(GemCap) in patients with advanced or metastaticadenocarcinoma of the biliary tract (abstract1275). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:317,2003.

64.

Stieler JM, Roll L, Arning M, et al:Gemcitabine and irinotecan-a pilot study forpatients with unresectable cancer of the bileduct system (abstract 1233). Proc Am Soc ClinOncol 22:307, 2003.

65.

Jacobson SD, Alberts SR, Mahoney MR,et al: Phase II trial of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil,and leucovorin in patients withunresectable or metastatic biliary and gallbladdercarcinoma: A North Central Cancer TreatmentGroup (NCCTG) study (abstract 1102).Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:275, 2003.

66.

Kuhn R, Hribaschek A, Eichelmann K,et al: Outpatient therapy with gemcitabine anddocetaxel for gallbladder, biliary, andcholangiocarcinomas. Invest New Drugs20:351-356, 2002.

67.

Rachamalla R, Malamud S, GrossbardML, et al: A phase I study to determine thesafety, maximum tolerated dose, and efficacyof biweekly irinotecan in combination with5-FU/leucovorin, gemcitabine, and cisplatin(G-FLIP) in patients with advanced adenocarcinomaof the exocrine pancreas or othersolid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 15:211-217,2004.

68.

Andre T, Louvet C, Artru P, et al: A phaseII study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin(GEMOX) in advanced biliary adenocarcinoma.Preliminary results (abstract). Eur JCancer 37(suppl 6):A60, 2001.

69.

Kuhn R, Ridwelski K, Eichelmann K, etal: Outpatient combination chemotherapy withgemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with cancerof the biliary system (abstract 2272). ProcAm Soc Clin Oncol vol 20, 2001.

70.

Kornek GV, Schmid K, Schuell B, et al:Mitomycin C in combination with capecitabineor biweekly high dose gemcitabine in patientswith advanced biliary tract cancer: Preliminaryresults of a parallel phase II trial (abstract). AnnOncol 196(suppl 5), 2002.

71.

Baluch S, Lau J, Dhillon T, et al: A welltolerated and highly effective regimen for locallyadvanced and metastatic biliary tract cancerswith gemcitabine and cisplatin (abstract1473). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:2003.

72.

Malik IA, Aziz Z, Zaidi SH, et al:Gemcitabine and cisplatin is a highly effectivecombination chemotherapy in patients withadvanced cancer of the gallbladder. Am J ClinOncol 26:174-177, 2003.

73.

Morizane C, Okada S, Okusaka T, et al:Phase II study of cisplatin, epirubicin, and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil for advancedbiliary tract cancer. Oncology 64:475-476,2003.

74.

Lozano R, Yehuda P, Hassan M, et al:Oral capecitabine (Xeloda) for the treatmentof hepatobiliary cancers (hepatocellular carcinoma,cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladdercancer) (abstract 1025). Proc Am Soc ClinOncol 19:264a, 2000.

75.

Kozuch P, Grossbard ML, Barzdins A,et al: Irinotecan combined with gemcitabine,5FU (5-fluorouracil), LV (leucovorin), andcisplatin (G-FLIP) is an effective and non-crossresistant regimen for refractory metastatic adenocarcinomaof the exocrine pancreas(MPAC). Oncologist 6:488-495, 2001.

76.

Dowlati A, Posey J, Ramanathan RK, etal: Multicenter phase II and pharmacokineticstudy of rebeccamycin analogue (RA) in advancedbiliary cancers (abstract 1070). Proc AmSoc Clin Oncol 22:267, 2003.

77.

Philip PA, Geyer SM, Thomas JP, et al:Tolerability of OSI-774 (Tarceva) in locallyadvanced or metastatic hepatocellular and biliarycarcinomas: An interim report (abstract1461). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:364, 2003.

78.

Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, et al: Aphase II trial and pharmacokinetic trial of S-1in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer(abstract 1355). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol22:337, 2003.