Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: Part II. Candidate Genes

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 6 No 7
Volume 6
Issue 7

This special series on cancer and genetics is compiled and edited by Henry T. Lynch, MD, director of the Hereditary Cancer Institute, professor of medicine, and chairman of the Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, and director of the Creighton Cancer Center, Omaha, Nebraska. Part I of this three-part series on pancreatic cancer appeared in June 1997. Part II (below) reviews the gene mutations thought to contribute to the development of hereditary pancreatic cancer, and Part III will explores the clinical recognition of a hereditary predisposition to pancreatic cancer.

This special series on cancer and genetics is compiledand edited by Henry T. Lynch, MD, director of the Hereditary Cancer Institute,professor of medicine, and chairman of the Department of Preventive Medicineand Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, and directorof the Creighton Cancer Center, Omaha, Nebraska. Part I of this three-part series on pancreatic cancer appeared in June 1997. Part II (below) reviews the gene mutations thought to contribute to the development of hereditary pancreatic cancer, and Part III will exploresthe clinical recognition of a hereditary predisposition to pancreatic cancer.

Before the genetic basis for a familial predisposition to a cancer canbe examined, it must first be established that such a predisposition exists.This has been done for pancreatic cancer.

It has been estimated that 5% to 10% of patients with pancreatic carcinomahave a hereditary susceptibility for the disease,[1-7] and a Canadian population-basedepidemiologic study found that approximately 8% of pancreatic cancer patientshave a first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer.[3]

In addition, patients suffering from a number of inherited syndromesare thought to be at increased risk of pancreatic cancer. These syndromesinclude von Hippel- Lindau disease, HNPCC (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectalcancer) due to germline defects in mismatch repair genes[4], the Peutz-Jegherssyndrome,[7] hereditary relapsing acute pancreatitis,[8] and the Li-Fraumenisyndrome.[9] These well-characterized syndromes, however, probably accountfor only a small proportion of the familial pancreatic carcinoma burden.[1-7]

Since most familial clusters of pancreatic cancer are not associatedwith a recognized syndrome, interest has therefore shifted to a "candidategene" approach. In this approach, patients with a familial clusteringof pancreatic cancer, but without a recognized cancer syndrome, are examinedfor germline mutations in genes found to be mutated in sporadic pancreaticcancer (see Part I, June 1997).

Mutations of p16

The p16 gene (CDKN2) is frequently inactivated in sporadic pancreaticcancer. It was the first gene identified for which germline mutations couldbe associated with an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer.[10]These p16 mutations were first identified as predisposing to a high riskof melanoma,[11,12] but carriers of germline p16 mutations also have a13-fold increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer.[10]

Such mutations appear to account for only a small percentage of allfamilial pancreatic cancers,[13] and they should be suspected in a patientwith pancreatic cancer and a strong family history of melanoma.[13]

Role of BRCA2

The search for the BRCA2 gene was aided by the identification of a homozygousdeletion in a sporadic pancreatic cancer. Germline BRCA2 mutations alsocontribute to the hereditary predisposition to pancreatic cancer. For example,in our recent examination of a large series of unselected patients withpancreatic cancer, we found that 7% had germline BRCA2 mutations.[14]

Remarkably, this hereditary risk for cancer could not have been predictedfrom the patients' clinical histories. Of four BRCA2 mutation carriers,none had a family history of pancreatic cancer, and only one had a first-degreerelative with breast cancer.[14] Of interest, pancreatic cancer in thesepatients with germline BRCA2 mutations does not usually present at an earlyage.[14,15]

The contribution of germline BRCA2 mutations to pancreatic cancer mayaccount for previous epidemiologic data that identified an increased prevalenceof pancreatic cancer in families of patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

For example, breast cancer families with germline BRCA2 mutations havea higher than expected number of members with pancreatic cancer,[15,16]and Tulinius et al found an increased relative risk of pancreatic cancerin male first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients.[17]

Furthermore, in their analysis of the Utah Population Database, Kerberand Slattery found that a family history of pancreatic cancer is significantlyassociated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.[18]

The increased risk of developing pancreatic and breast cancer associatedwith germline BRCA2 mutations is particularly noteworthy because of thewidespread availability of clinical testing for these mutations.

Based on the relative risk of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1or BRCA2 mutation carriers, the penetrance of early-onset breast cancerin BRCA2 mutant carriers is approximately one third that of their BRCA1counterparts.[19]

The lifetime risk of breast cancer in BRCA2 mutant carriers is lesscertain, but is probably significantly less than the 80% to 90% risk forBRCA1 mutation carriers, and may be on the order of 25% to 35%.[19,20]

Low Penetrance of BRCA2

Penetrance will vary within individual families depending on additionalfactors, including the type of mutation, its position within the gene,the inheritance of unknown modifier genes, and environmental factors. Forexample, the cancer risk of most missense mutations will be difficult topredict, as their effects on protein function are generally unknown.

Most of the known mutations of BRCA2, including those found commonlyin the Ashkenazi population, would generate truncated proteins. However,not all truncating mutations of the BRCA2 gene would necessarily have anequivalent effect.

For example, mutations in certain regions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genesmight be more likely to cause ovarian cancer than would other mutations.[21,22]Similarly, it is possible that mutations of certain regions of the BRCA2gene might, in particular, predispose carriers to the development of pancreaticcancer.

The exact risk of pancreatic cancer in a carrier of a germline BRCA2mutation is not known at present, but an approximation may be constructedfrom the currently available data. Among 21 BRCA2 families, Thorlaciuset al observed 100 patients with breast cancer and 11 with pancreatic cancer.[23]Similarly, in a report of eight families with germline mutations of BRCA2,Phelan et al found four patients with pancreatic cancer and 48 with breastcancer.[15]

In contrast, Couch et al found no pancreatic cancers in 11 familieswith 36 breast cancers.[24] As these families were recruited to help identifythe BRCA2 gene, there was clearly a selection bias toward those familieswith breast as opposed to pancreatic cancer. However, these data suggestthat, in a carrier of a germline BRCA2 mutation, pancreatic cancer maybe approximately one tenth as common as breast cancer. Thus, the lifetimerisk of pancreatic cancer in BRCA2 mutant carriers is probably in the rangeof 5%.

This low penetrance at which germline BRCA2 mutations result in pancreaticcancer may explain the previously described observation that 7% of apparentlysporadic pancreatic cancer patients have germline mutations in BRCA2.

This figure compares well with the rates seen for "apparently sporadic"breast cancers (less than 4%) and ovarian cancers (less than 4%).[25-29]Thus, even apparently sporadic cancers may, in fact, be caused by germlinemutations if these mutations have a low penetrance.

Other Genes

Of the other genes found to be somatically inactivated in pancreaticcancer, none has been found in the germline of pancreatic cancer patients.

Hahn et al identified the DPC4 tumor suppressor gene and demonstratedthat it is somatically inactivated in 50% of pancreatic cancers.[30] Apartfrom colon cancer, where DPC4 is somatically inactivated in approximately20% of cancers,[31] most tumor types are rarely associated with inactivationof this gene.[32] Moskaluk et al screened 18 families that had two or moremembers with pancreatic cancer and found no germline DPC4 mutations.[33]

Patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome due to germline mutations of thep53 gene have only a 1.2% risk of pancreatic cancer.[9] Similarly, an associationbetween hereditary pancreatic cancer and germline K-ras mutations has neverbeen documented in the human germline.

It seems likely that one or more additional genes for hereditary pancreaticcancer-specific susceptibility exist but have yet to be identified. Thissuspicion is based on the identification of many pancreatic cancer familieswhose pedigrees do not suggest a BRCA2 or p16 family. Such families havebeen reported by Lynch and coworkers.[1,2]

Johns Hopkins Registry

Pancreatic cancer families that lack a BRCA2 or p16 pedigree are typicalof most families in the National Familial Pancreatic Tumor Registry (NFPTR)at Johns Hopkins.[34] The registry has already enrolled more than 70 familiesin which more than one first-degree relative has pancreatic cancer. Appropriatefamilies are screened initially for germline mutations in "candidategenes."

Familial Pancreatic Cancer Registry

To register a family or an individual with a history of pancreatic cancer,write to the National Familial Pancreatic Tumor Registry, The Johns HopkinsHospital, Meyer 7-181, Department of Pathology, 600 Wolfe St., Baltimore,MD 21287, or visit the Registry's web site at http://www.path.jhu.edu/pancreas.

Although linkage analysis has historically been used to establish theloci of most of the inherited tumor suppressor genes in other tumor types,the detection of a familial pancreatic cancer gene by use of a linkageanalysis approach will be difficult.

The small number of affected members in most families, the short lifeexpectancy of most pancreatic cancer patients, and concerns about low penetrancewould mandate that a large number of pancreatic cancer families be studiedin order for this approach to be successful. The NFPTR is therefore activelytrying to identify and register additional families in which there is anaggregate of pancreatic cancer (see box ).

References:

1. Lynch HT: Genetics and pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 129:266-268,1994.

2. Lynch HT, Fusaro L, Lynch JF: Familial pancreatic cancer: A familystudy. Pancreas 7:511-515, 1992.

3. Ghadirian P, Boyle P, Simard A, et al: Reported family aggregationof pancreatic cancer within a population-based case-control study in theFrancophone community in Montreal, Canada. Int J Pancreatol 10:183-196,1991.

4. Lynch HT, Voorhees GJ, Lanspa SJ, et al: Pancreatic carcinoma andhereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma: A family study. Br J Cancer52:271-273, 1985.

5. Fernandez E, La Vecchia C, D'Avanzo B, et al: Family history andthe risk of liver, gallbladder, and pancreatic cancer. Cancer EpidemiolBiomarkers Prev 3:209, 1994.

6. Lumadue JA, Griffin CA, Osman M, et al: Familial pancreatic cancerand the genetics of pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am 75:845, 1995.

7. Giardiello FM, Welsh SB, Hamilton SR, et al: Increased risk of cancerin the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. N Engl J Med 316:1511, 1987.

8. Whitcomb DC, Gorry MC, Preston RA, et al: Hereditary pancreatitisis caused by a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Nat Genet 14:141,1996.

9. Kleihues P, Schauble B, zur Hausen A, et al: Tumors associated withp53 mutations: A synopsis of 91 families. Am J Pathol 150:1-13, 1997.

10. Goldstein AM, Fraser MC, Struewing JP, et al: Increased risk ofpancreatic carcinoma in melanoma-prone kindreds with p16INK4 mutations.N Engl J Med 333:970-974, 1995.

11. Kamb A, Shattuck-Eidens D, Eeles R, et al: Analysis of the p16 gene(CDKN2) as a candidate for the chromosome 9p melanoma susceptibility locus.Nat Genet 8:22-26, 1994.

12. Hussussuan CJ, Struewing JP, Goldstein AM, et al: Germline p16 mutationsin familial melanoma. Nat Genet 8:15-21, 1994.

13. Moskaluk CA, Rhuban RH, Lietman A, et al: Low prevalence of p16INK4aand CDK4 mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma. Human Mutation (inpress).

14. Goggins M, Schutte M, Lu J, et al: Germline BRCA2 mutations in patientswith apparently sporadic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 56:5630-5651, 1996.

15. Phelan CM, Lancaster JM, Tonin P, et al: Mutation analysis of theBRCA2 gene in 49 site-specific breast cancer families. Nat Genet 13:120-122,1996.

16. Tonin P, Weber B, Oint K, et al: Frequency of recurrent BRCA1 andBRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer families. Nat Med 2:1179-1183,1995.

17. Tulinius H, Olafsdottir GH, Sigvaldason H, et al: Neoplastic diseasesin families of breast cancer patients. J Med Genet 31:621, 1994.

18. Kerber RA, Slattery ML: The impact of family history on ovariancancer risk. Arch Intern Med 155:905, 1995.

19. Oddoux C, Struewing JP, Clayton CM, et al: The carrier frequencyof the BRCA2 6174delT mutation among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals is approximately1%. Nat Genet 13:188-190, 1996.

20. Gayther SA, Mangion J, Russell P, et al: Variation of risks of breastand ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of theBRCA2 gene. Nat Genet 15:103-105, 1997.

21. Roa BB, Boyd AA, Voichik K, et al: Ashkenazi Jewish population frequenciesfor common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nat Genet 14:185-187, 1996.

22. Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT: Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium:Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Am J HumGenet 56:265-271, 1995.

23. Thorlacius S, Olafsdottir G, Tryggvadottir L, et al: A single BRCA2mutation in male and female breast carcinoma families from Iceland withvaried cancer phenotypes. Nat Genet 13:117-119, 1996.

24. Couch FJ, Farid LM, DeShano ML, et al: BRCA2 germline mutationsin male breast cancer cases and breast cancer families. Nat Genet 13:123-125,1996.

25. Teng DH-F, Bogden R, Mitchell J, et al: Low incidence of BRCA2 mutationsin breast carcinoma and other cancers. Nat Genet 13:241-244, 1996.

26. Takahashi H, Chits HC, Bandera CA, et al: Mutations of the BRCA2gene in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 56:2738-2741, 1996.

27. Lancaster JM , Wooster R, Mangion J, et al: BRCA2 mutations in primarybreast and ovarian cancers. Nat Genet 13:238-240, 1996.

28. Foster KA, Harrington P, Kerr J, et al: Somatic and germline mutationsof the BRCA2 gene in sporadic ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 56:3622-3625,1996.

29. Miki Y, Katagiri T, Kasumi F, et al: Mutation analysis in the BRCA2gene in primary breast cancers. Nat Genet 13:245-247, 1996.

30. Hahn SA, Hoque ATMS, Schutte M, et al: DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressorgene at human chromosome 18q2l.1. Science 271:350-353, 1996.

31. Thiagalingam S, Lengauer C, Leach FS, et al: Evaluation of candidatetumour suppressor genes on chromosome 18 in colorectal cancers. Nat Genet13:343-347, 1996.

32. Schutte M, Hruban RH, Hedrick L, et al: DPC4 gene in various tumortypes. Cancer Res 56:2527-2530, 1996.

33. Moskaluk CA, Hruban RH, Schutte M, et al: Polymerase chain reactionand cycle sequencing of DPC4 in the analysis of familial pancreatic carcinoma.Diagnostic Molec Pathol 6:85-90, 1997.

34. Hruban R, Yeo CJ, Kem SE: Pancreatic cancer, in McKusick V, VogelsteinB (eds): Mendelian and Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. CD-ROM edition.New York, McGraw-Hill, 1997.

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and higher PD-L1 expression may benefit from treatment with tislelizumab, according to Syma Iqbal, MD.
Quantifying disease volume to help identify potential recurrence following surgery may be a helpful advance, according to Sean Dineen, MD.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.