Julie Vose, MD, MBA, Discussed Toxicities Associated With Acalabrutinib or Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

News
Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Julie Vose, MD, MBA, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting to talk about a clinical trial comparing acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (ASCO), CancerNetwork® spoke with Julie Vose, MD, MBA, about the phase 3 ELEVATE CLL R/R trial (NCT02477696) concerning acalabrutinib (Calquence) versus ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Vose focused on the toxicities associated with the treatments with the second-generation Brurton tyrosine kinase inhibitor potentially showing fewer toxic effects.

The study was a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial with the primary end point of progression-free survival and the secondary end points including the incidence of treatment-emergent infections of grade 3 or greater and overall survival.

Transcript:

One [abstract from ASCO 2021] that was very interesting to me was a trial that was in CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, where patients were randomized to acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib for [the treatment of] CLL. This trial was a noninferiority trial so that the outcomes as far as responses were not that clinically significantly different [between arms]. What was different was the toxicities. We had always felt that possibly the second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors would be less toxic. This was the first trial that demonstrated that in a randomized trial, where the acalabrutinib, which is a second-generation [agent, caused] less atrial fibrillation and less hypertension. It did have a little bit higher [toxicity] in some categories, such as headach. I think it showed some of the changes that we felt were always there [we have now seen] demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial.

References

Byrd J, Hillmen P, Ghia P, et al. First results of a head-to-head trial of acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):7500. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.7500

Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
A phase 1/2 trial assessed the use of menin inhibitor DSP-5336 in patients with acute leukemia overexpressing HOXA9 and MEIS1.
A pooled analysis trial assessed the impact of acalabrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia across treatment lines.
relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, glofitamab, Obinutuzumab, phase 1/2 study, NCT03075696, Tycel J. Phillips, MD
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Related Content