New Data Show There is ‘Tremendous Progress’ in Treatment of a Leukemia Subtype, Says Expert


Data presented at this year’s American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting spotlight promising novel treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia, according to an expert from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Findings from several studies assessing different treatments for acute myeloid leukemia—one of the most common leukemias in adults—highlight some encouraging outcomes, according to Naval G. Daver, MD.

“[There] is tremendous progress in acute myeloid leukemia,” Daver explained. “The clinical trials being done today are extremely exciting and also offer patients not just opportunity to go on trial, but to also [receive] potentially highly active therapies that could put them in remission, get them a path to transplant, and hopefully even translate to long-term remissions and cures.”

Daver, director of the Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® following the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meetingand touched on data from studies assessing various treatment regimens, their clinical relevancy within the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) space, and where research may be focused in the future.

Potential Triplet Treatment Option in FLT3-Mutant AML

Among the early data that Daver highlighted were phase 1/2 findings from a study assessing gilteritinib (Xospata), azacitidine (Vidaza), and venetoclax (Venclexta) in a population of patients diagnosed with FLT3-mutant AML.1

Data from the trial showed that there were high complete response (CR) rates in the small patient population, with encouraging and long-lasting responses noted regardless of FLT3 mutation status among newly diagnosed patients.

“It's important to realize that azacitidine and venetoclax is approved and is being used as the frontline standard of care for patients who are unfit or unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy because of age or comorbidities,” Daver explained. “Although the combination has shown very encouraging responses—CR rates of about 70%, median survival of 15 months, both of which are much higher than was achieved with single-agent azacitidine alone—there are certain molecular and cytogenetic subsets where the amount of benefits seems to be restricted. These include especially [those with a] FLT3 mutation, where in spite of good response rates, the median survival is only 11.5 months.”

When the triplet regimen was used in the frontline setting (n = 27), investigators observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 100%, including a complete response rate (CR) of 92%, a CR rate with incomplete recovery (CRi) of 4%, and a morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) rate of 4%. Patients with relapsed/refractory disease (n = 20) treated with azacitidine, venetoclax and gilteritinib had an ORR of 70%. This included a CR rate of 20%, a CRi rate of 15%, and an MLFS rate of 35%.

Additionally, 1 patient in the relapsed/refractory setting experienced a partial response (PR) while 5 did not respond to the triplet therapy. There were no reports of early death in either setting.

More than half (67%) of the study population achieved a bone marrow blast level of less than 5% at 14 days. Of note, according to information from Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, people with a blast level of less than 5% are considered at low risk for experiencing symptoms.

The findings also showed that 26% of patients had insufficient or aplastic bone marrow blasts, and 7% experienced 5% blasts or more in the frontline setting. The bone marrow response rates were 47%, 16%, and 37%, respectively in the relapsed/refractory setting.

Moreover, 82% and 43% of patients in the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, respectively, were minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative by flow cytometry (10-4) and 89% and 57% were negative by polymerase chain reaction (10-2).

For patients who were treated in the frontline setting, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was not reached, and the 6- and 12-month RFS rates were 90% and 74%, respectively. The median overall survival was also not reached, and the 6- and 12-month rates were 96% and 85%, respectively.

Among those with relapsed/refractory disease, the median RFS was 6.1 months, and the 6- and 12-month RFS rates were 50% and 25%, respectively. Additionally, the median OS was 5.8 months, and the respective 6- and 12-month OS rates were 48% and 30%.

“This is a very promising signal,” Daver said. “It still is [an] early-phase study, so I don't think that this is something that can be widely adopted, especially outside of large academic centers, because one [has] to realize that [at] MD Anderson, we do have a lot of logistical support.

“We check bloodwork frequently; three times a week, we often admit these patients for the initial frontline therapy for about 3 to 4 weeks, we are able to do transfusion, same day, all of these patients are on prophylactic antifungal, antiviral, antibacterial. This is a good starting point to do larger studies.”

A Potent Combination for Those With High-Risk AML

Another set of early-phase findings (NCT04435691) showed that adding magrolimab to azacitidine and venetoclax was safe and yielded treatment responses in the frontline setting of newly diagnosed elderly or unfit patients with AML.2

The data also indicated that the triplet elicited modest activity among patients with high-risk and relapsed/refractory AML.

“Magrolimab is a CD47 antibody, [with] CD47 being probably the most important and interesting immunological pathway that has emerged in the last 5 to 7 years in myeloid malignancies,” Daver said. “This agent was developed to block the engagement between CD47 and SIRP alpha, which actually leads to inhibition of macrophages. By blocking this engagement, the macrophages are then able to attack, engulf, and kill tumor cells. This has especially been shown to be active in leukemias, myeloid diseases, and in lymphomas.”

The CR/CRi rate among the 43 patients in the frontline setting was 72%.

“For this very difficult population, this was actually very encouraging,” he explained. “We [also saw] that the duration of response has not been met for either the TP53-mutated and wild-type [population] with about a 13 to 14 month follow up. That's actually also quite an encouraging signal, [as] with TP53-mutated patients, we see [usually] see a duration of response of 4 to 6 months.”

Moreover, the CI/CRi rates in those with de novo disease who were either TP53 mutant (n = 22) or TP53 wild type (n = 11) were 64% and 91%, respectively. Those with secondary AML who were either TP53 mutant (n = 6) or wild type (n = 5) had a CR/CRi rate of 60% and 80%, respectively.

At a median follow-up of 14.5 months in the de novo cohort (n = 33), a median duration of response had not yet been reached in either patient subgroup. However, the 18-month duration of response in the TP53 mutant patients was 52% vs 74% in those with wild-type tumors. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 83% for those who were TP53 mutant and 53% for those who were wild type.

In a small cohort (n = 10) with secondary AML—cancer that has evolved from prior myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms or occurred after prior exposure to treatment for another cancer—the triplet elicited a median OS of 7.6 months and 9.6 months in those with TP53 mutant and wild-type disease, respectively.

Menin Inhibition May Result in Long-Lasting Responses in AML Subset

Lastly, Daver touched on the potential of menin inhibition with revumenib, which yielded treatment responses in a population of patients with heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory KMT2A-rearranged/NPM1-mutant AML.3

“Menin pathways emerged as one of the important targetable pathways in both AML and [acute lymphoblastic leukemia],” Daver said. “This is a very new pathway. Menin inhibitors have actually just been in clinical trials for the last 2 to 2.5 years.”

Updated results of the phase 1 AUGMENT-101 trial (NCT04065399) highlighted an ORR of 53% in a patient population assessing treatment efficacy(n = 60), including a CR rate of 20%, CR with incomplete hematologic (CRh) recovery of 10%, and CR with incomplete platelet (CRp) recovery of 8%. Additionally, 56% of patients were MRD negative.

In patients whose treatments met the criteria for recommended phase 2 dosing (n = 48), the ORR was 52%, including a CR rate of 17%, a CRh rate of 10%, and a CRp rate of 10%. The rate of MRD negativity was also 56% in this group.

The ORR among patients in the efficacy population who had KMT2A-rearranged (n = 46) or NPM1-mutant (n = 14) disease was 59% and 36%, respectively. In the RP2D population, the ORRs were 54% and 46% for the KMT2A (n = 37) and NPM1 (n = 11) populations, respectively.

Those with a CR or CRh had a median time to response of 1.9 months. Twelve responders went on to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant. Patients in the KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutant populations had a median OS of 7.0 months. Revumenib was also found to downregulate FLT3 transcription, resulting in responses in those with co-mutations.

“For menin inhibition, the initial step, of course, is to try to get them FDA approved,” Daver concluded. “For that, I think the single-arm studies in relapsed refractory MLL-rearranged and NPM1-mutated patient will hopefully provide sufficient data on safety, efficacy, how to give these optimally, and how to manage differentiation syndrome to get them an FDA approval and path to market.

“Eventually, when you're hoping that they will improve the cure rates rather than just the medians, they will be best suited in my opinion and in the opinion of many of us at MD Anderson, in a combination [regimen].”


  1. Short NJ, Dinardo CD, Daver N, et al. Updated results from a phase I/II study of the triplet combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and gilteritinib for patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Presented at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 10-13; New Orleans, LA. Abstract 831.
  2. Daver N, Senapati J, Mati A, et al. Phase I/II study of azacitidine (AZA) with venetoclax (VEN) and magrolimab (Magro) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (ND) older/unfit or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Presented at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 10-13; New Orleans, LA. Abstract 61.
  3. Issa GC, Aldoss I, DiPersio JF, et al. The menin inhibitor SNDX-5613 (revumenib) leads to durable responses in patients (Pts) with KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1 Mutant AML: updated results of a phase (Ph) 1 study. Presented at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 10-13; New Orleans, LA. Abstract 63.
Related Videos
Ghayas C. Issa, MD, an expert on acute myeloid leukemia
Ghayas C. Issa, MD, an expert on acute myeloid leukemia
Ghayas C. Issa, MD, an expert on acute myeloid leukemia
Ghayas C. Issa, MD, an expert on acute myeloid leukemia
Ghayas C. Issa, MD, an expert on acute myeloid leukemia
Ghayas C. Issa, MD, an expert on acute myeloid leukemia
Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, discusses how data from the phase 3 QuANTUM-First trial may advance the treatment field for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD–positive acute myeloid leukemia.
An expert from Duke Health says that patients with NPM1-mutatant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia did not experience any significant safety signals following treatment with ziftomenib.
At the recommended 600 mg dose, ziftomenib interestingly produced complete remissions in patients relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia who harbored NPM1 mutations .
An expert from Duke Health reviews the design of the phase 1/2 trial of the KOMET-001 study in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Related Content