Results from a phase 1/2a trial supported the designation for VS-7375 in those with PDAC harboring a KRAS G12D mutation.
Results from a phase 1/2a trial supported the designation for VS-7375 in those with PDAC harboring a KRAS G12D mutation.
The FDA has granted fast track designation (FTD) to an oral KRAS G12D inhibitor, VS-7375 (GFH375 in China), for the treatment of patients with KRAS G12D-mutated locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC) and in either the first-line of treatment or who received 1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, according to a press release from the developer, Verastem Oncology.1
In April 2025, the FDA approved an investigational new drug application for VS-7375 in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.2
Data supporting the FDA’s decision came from the multicenter, open-label phase 1/2a VS-7375-101 trial (NCT06500676) that evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the agent in those with advanced solid tumors harboring a KRAS G12D mutation. Initial safety and efficacy findings were shared at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.3
At the data cut-off of May 16, 2025, in 23 patients with PDAC treated at the target dose range, the overall response rate (ORR) was 52% (90% CI, 34%-70%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100% (90% CI, 88%-100%). Of these patients, 11 had stable disease and 12 experienced a partial response, of which 6 were confirmed; 5 patients were not on treatment at the time of analysis.
In all patients, the median time on treatment was 11.8 weeks (range, 0.1-42.1), the median time to response was 6.2 weeks (range, 6.0-24.7), and 36 of 62 patients remained on treatment.
“The Fast Track Designation for VS-7375 underscores the importance of our potential best-in-class KRAS G12D (ON/OFF) inhibitor. As we continue enrollment in our US phase 1/2a clinical trial, our goal is to accelerate the program’s development given the lack of FDA-approved, KRAS G12D-targeted treatments for [patients] living with KRAS G12D cancers,” said Dan Paterson, president and chief executive officer of Verastem Oncology, in the press release.1 “Given the encouraging initial safety and efficacy results in China reported by our partner, GenFleet Therapeutics, at ASCO this year, we are excited to be advancing VS-7375 in the US to evaluate it in advanced pancreatic cancer and non–small cell lung cancer [NSCLC] and in combination with cetuximab [Erbitux] in advanced solid tumors, including colorectal cancer.”
A total of 62 patients were enrolled on the trial, 33 had PDAC. In the dose escalation and expansion portion of the trial, patients received doses ranging from 100 mg once a day to 900 mg once a day, as well as 300 mg twice a day; escalation occurred with accelerated titration and Bayesian optimal interval design plus backfilling. When the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was identified, the indication was expanded to open 4 cohorts: an NSCLC cohort, a PDAC cohort, a colorectal cancer cohort, and another solid tumors cohort.
Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors with a KRAS G12D mutation, had been previously treated with standard therapies, and had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
Of the 27 patients with PDAC who received either 400 mg or 600 mg daily or 300 mg twice a day, the median age of patients was 61 years (range, 46-74), 52% were male, and 93% had an ECOG performance status of 1. The number of prior anti-cancer therapies was 2 in 44%, more than 3 in 33%, and 1 in 22%. All patients had metastasis at baseline; 91% had liver metastasis, and 5% had bone metastasis.
The trial’s end points, in phase 1, were safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose and RP2D; anti-tumor activity such as ORR, DCR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS); pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers. In phase 2, they were ORR, DCR, PFS, OS, safety, and biomarkers.
Regarding safety, all patients experienced any grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs), and 31% experienced a TRAE of grade 3 or higher; treatment-related serious AEs occurred in 10%. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (69%), nausea (68%), vomiting (61%), and anemia (52%). The most common grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were neutrophil count decreased (8%) and diarrhea (5%). TRAEs led to dose reduction, dose interruption, and treatment discontinuation in 11%, 21%, and 3%, respectively.
In patients who received either 400 mg or 600 mg daily or 300 mg twice a day, TRAEs led to dose reduction, dose interruption, and treatment discontinuation in 10%, 18%, and 4%, respectively.
There were no dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related deaths observed in the trial.
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.