Paxene Wins ODAC Backing for Use In AIDS-Associated Kaposi’s Sarcoma

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 6 No 10
Volume 6
Issue 10

BETHESDA, Md-For the second time in as many meetings, the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) has recommended that the FDA approve a paclitaxel-based drug for the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS).

BETHESDA, Md—For the second time in as many meetings, the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) has recommended that the FDA approve a paclitaxel-based drug for the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS).

The panel voted unanimously in favor of the approval of Baker-Norton Pharmaceuticals’ Paxene (paclitaxel) for use after failure of first-line or subsequent systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced AIDS-related KS.

In June, ODAC members urged the approval of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Taxol for Injection Concentrate for the second-line treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma in AIDS patients. The FDA has since approved the new indication for Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Taxol as recommended.

In support of Paxene, Baker-Norton , a wholly owned subsidiary of IVAX Corporation, presented a study involving 89 HIV patients with KS who had previously undergone chemotherapy.

The company’s analysis and that of the FDA review team generally agreed on the response rate. Baker-Norton claimed two complete responses and 39 partial responses (44%). The FDA credited no complete responses and 37 partial responses (42%).

However, while the company listed 29 patents (33%) with stable disease and only five with progressive disease (6%), the FDA analysis concluded that only 16 patients (18%) remained stable and 22 (25%) progressed. Both analyses listed 14 patients (16%) as “not evaluable.”

The FDA reported that median duration of response was 128 days; median time to response was 34 days; and median time to progression was 164 days.

Data presented at the meeting showed that among the 89 patients, six had improvements in their facial lesions while 19 did not; one had improvement in his foot lesions while 12 did not; and six had improvement in lower extremity lymphedema while 45 did not.

On the basis of clinical benefit and quality-of-life assessments, as well as the cutaneous tumor response rate, the panel voted unanimously that Paxene showed patient benefit. Finally, and again in 11-to-0 votes, the ODAC members agreed that Paxene’s safety was acceptable “in view of the trial’s efficacy results and results available with alternative therapy” and that the FDA should approve it.

Related Videos
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Data from a ctDNA analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE study indicate that KIT mutational status may be associated with response to certain Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in GIST, according to an expert from the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Massachusetts.