Preoperative RT Useful in Borderline Resectable Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Article

The use of preoperative radiotherapy may be a reasonable approach to patients with borderline resectable soft-tissue sarcomas, according to the results of a retrospective study.

Histopathologic image of myxoid liposarcoma arising in the deep soft tissue of the thigh; source: KGH, Wikimedia Commons

The use of preoperative radiotherapy may be a reasonable approach to patients with borderline resectable soft-tissue sarcomas, according to the results of a retrospective study. The study found that preoperative radiotherapy led to tumor reduction in 80% of patients, with the largest size reductions seen in patients with myxoid liposarcomas.

“There is currently no consensus of the ideal timing for adjuvant radiotherapy, which may be given either before or after surgery,” wrote researchers from London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. “Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy indicate at least equivalent outcomes for local control rates and overall survival. However, preoperative radiotherapy offers potential advantages of reduced late toxicity and improved functional outcomes, while maintaining good local control rates.”

In order to understand more about the effect of preoperative radiotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment in this patient population, the researchers conducted a retrospective study of 68 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma who had undergone radiotherapy between December 2004 and July 2011. The results of the study were published in the European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

The majority of tumors studied were located in the extremities, specifically, the lower limbs, and about one-third of the tumors were myxoid liposarcoma. Median tumor size was 12.5 cm.

Sixty patients underwent radiotherapy with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions given during 5 weeks of treatment. Eight patients had a regimen of 44 Gy to 50.4 Gy in 22 to 28 daily fractions.

Eighty percent of patients had a reduction in tumor volume after preoperative radiotherapy. The median change in maximal tumor dimension was –13.6% and the median change in volume was –33.3%.

“Our cohort included 19 patients with myxoid liposarcoma, which are increasingly being recognized as being particularly radiosensitive,” the researchers wrote. “Certainly we observed greater reductions in the median maximal tumor diameter and volume than for other histologies, with values of –21.4% and –64.2%, respectively.”

In contrast, 20% of patients had an increase in tumor volume. However, complete surgical resection was achieved in 93% of patients, including the 11 patients who had an increase in tumor volume; 7% of patients had microscopically positive margins.

“This suggests that it may be possible for some patients to continue and complete a course of preoperative radiotherapy despite an increase in tumor volume during treatment,” the researchers wrote.

The 2-year local relapse-free survival was 87.5% and the 2-year overall survival was 74.7%. Eight patients had a local relapse between 2 to 24.8 months after surgery.

Related Videos
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Data from a ctDNA analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE study indicate that KIT mutational status may be associated with response to certain Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in GIST, according to an expert from the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Massachusetts.