Previously Unrecognized Variant of FL Described

News
Article

Follicular large cleaved cell lymphoma is frequently misclassified, according to researchers.

Follicular large cleaved-cell lymphoma (FLC) represents a previously unrecognized variant of follicular lymphoma (FL) with distinctive pathologic features and implications for treatment decision-making, according to authors of a case series published in Human Pathology.

“The correct diagnosis of FLC is important for accurate prognostication and may be important in the selection of therapy for these patients,” reported Patricia Aoun, MD, MPH, of the City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, and coauthors. “FLC is a variant of follicular lymphoma which should be recognized in future lymphoma classifications,” the authors wrote.

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for lymphoma recommends categorizing FL cases into three grades (FL1-3) that reflect the average number of centroblasts in the neoplastic follicles. However, that classification system does not recognize a form of FL characterized by a predominance of large cleaved cells (centrocytes) with too few centroblasts to meet the WHO FL3 criteria, the authors noted. 

“Because FLC is not included in the WHO classification, the entity is not well-described in the current literature, and the diagnosis can be challenging for pathologists,” they emphasized, noting that pathologists are frequently puzzled by the presence of numerous large cells, which the WHO classification system categorizes as low-grade disease. 

Using the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group registry, the authors found 72 patients diagnosed between 1983 and 2010, whose FL they classified as FLC. Another 593 FL cases from the same period were retrieved for comparison.

Fifty-seven percent of the FLC cases were initially diagnosed as FLs, but the remainder were initially sent for pathological consultation without definitive diagnosis. The authors reported that, of the 41 cases originally recognized as FL, 46% were classified at low-grade disease (WHO FL1, 12%; FL2, 34%; FL3, 49%). 

Pathologists frequently recognize the high-grade nature of FLC cases based on the nuclear size, proliferation and chromatin pattern, but these cases do not meet the criteria of WHO FL3.

“However, nearly half [46%] of our cases were diagnosed as low-grade FL, which could affect the treatment and prognosis of these patients,” the authors emphasized. 

The pathologic features of FLC “include pale follicles with follicular or interfollicular fibrosis and a predominance of large cleaved cells with high proliferation,” the authors reported.

“Cytologically, the cells are predominantly large cleaved cells with moderately coarse to fine chromatin, absent or inconspicuous nucleoli, and small to moderate amounts of pale cytoplasm,” they wrote. “The t(14;18) [translocation] was present in 83% of the cases, and a high proportion expressed BCL2 (84%), BCL6 (100%), and CD10 (88%), and had high Ki67 proliferation (81%).” 

The average nuclear diameter of the large cleaved cells was roughly twice that of small lymphocytes, the authors noted.

Clinically, FLC is similar to other FL subtypes, with “excellent” survival outcomes among patients who are treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab.

Related Videos
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
There is no absolute age cutoff where CAR T cells are contraindicated for those with large B-cell lymphoma, says David L. Porter, MD.
David L. Porter, MD, emphasizes referring patients with large B-cell lymphoma early for CAR T-cell therapy consultation.
It may be applicable to administer CAR T-cell therapy to patients with large B-cell lymphoma in a community or outpatient setting.
Findings from a study highlight that 7/8 mismatched unrelated donor posttransplant cyclophosphamide may be a suitable alternative treatment option for those with graft-vs-host disease.
Related Content