Reid Merryman, MD, on Study Findings Investigating Prognostic Value of ctDNA for Patients with DLBCL

News
Video

Thought leader detailed the findings from an oral presentation investigating patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Reid Merryman, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, spoke with CancerNetwork® about the findings from an oral presentation investigating the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA among patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presented at the 2020 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition.

Transcription:

What we found is that about a quarter of patients had detectable minimal residual disease [MRD] in their apheresis stem cell product, and those patients had much worse outcomes. The 5-year progression-free survival for that cohort of patients, the MRD-positive patients, was only 13% compared with 52% for MRD-negative patients. And as you would expect, the bad outcomes in those patients were driven by high rates of relapse after transplant. Those patients also had inferior progression-free survival. I think those results suggest that the quarter of patients or so who are MRD positive should receive an alternative treatment because they really don’t do well with autologous stem cell transplantation.

And then the other cohort that we analyzed was patients who had peripheral blood samples collected serially after transplant. And in that sample, we found that a positive MRD assessment in plasma with fairly high sensitivity and specificity could predict patients who were about to relapse with a median lead time of about 2 months. Again, I think one could think about using these data to support a clinical trial where patients have serial samples that have to be fairly frequent, serial samples collected after transplant, with the idea being that you might be able to preemptively treat some of these patients before they have clinical relapse.

Related Videos
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Whether CAR T-cell therapy or T-cell engagers should dominate the multiple myeloma landscape may be hard to determine, says David S. Siegel, MD.
Next steps for research in the multiple myeloma space may include the development of novel CAR T-cell strategies and bispecific antibodies.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Adverse effects associated with oral azacitidine in low- or intermediate-risk MDS are typically transient, according to Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, MS.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Ongoing genomic profiling analyses in the ASC4FIRST trial may further determine which patients with CML may benefit from treatment with asciminib.
Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD, highlights ongoing trials assessing intravenous and subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.
Related Content