Sintilimab Improved Response Rates for Metastatic or Recurrent Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Although sintilimab improved overall response rates and maintained a tolerable safety profile for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma, it did not improve overall or progression-free survival.

The anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody, sintilimab (Tyvyt), improved objective response rate (ORR) and maintained a manageable safety profile for but patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), even though no overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) benefit was observed when combined with standard-of-care chemotherapy, according to research presented at the 2022 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

The standard of care for PDAC is the chemotherapy combination FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) or modified-FOLFIRINOX (mFFX [folinic acid, irinotecan, oxaliplatin followed by fluorouracil]). Researchers in this study investigated whether sintilimab, a human immunoglobin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to PD-1 and has shown efficacy in other cancer types, could improve outcomes for patients with PDAC in the first or second line.

“Pancreatic cancers are resistant to PD-1 [and] to PD-L1 used as monotherapy, so the chemotherapy may expand the efficacy of immunotherapy,” said Tingbo Liang, chairman of The First Affiliated Hospital at Zhejiang University School of Medicine, in his presentation.

The single-center, open-label phase 3 CISPD3 trial (NCT03977272) randomized patients 1:1 to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab every 3 weeks plus mFFX (irinotecan 85 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 68 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks versus mFFX alone. Of the study population of 110 total patients, only 3 patients on the sintilimab arm and 5 on the mFFX-alone arm had previous chemotherapy.

Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other reasons for discontinuation. The primary end point was OS, while secondary end points included ORR, PFS, and disease control rate (DCR).

Twenty-one patients receiving sintilimab had a partial response (PR) and 1 had a complete response (CR), while 11 had a PR and none had a CR when receiving mFFX alone. In the sintilimab arm, 11 patients were not evaluable compared with 9 in the mFFX arm. The ORR for sintilimab was 50.0% compared with 23.9% with mFFX alone (P = .05). The duration of response was 7.85 months for sintilimab compared with 4.63 months for mFFX, but this was not statistically significant (P > .05). The DCR was 84.0% and 71.7% for sintilimab and mFFX, respectively (P > .05).

However, the median OS was similar between the 2 arms for the intention-to-treat population: 10.9 months for sintilimab and 10.8 months for mFFX alone with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.70-1.690; P > .05). The median PFS was 5.9 months for sintilimab and 5.73 months for mFFX with a HR of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.62-1.41), showing no improvement in survival outcomes based on these data.

In terms of safety, grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 45 patients (84.9%) in the sintilimab arm compared with 40 (74.1%) in the mFFX-alone arm. The most common grade 3 or higher AE was neutropenia, which was reported in 31 patients (58.5%) given sintilimab and 24 patients (44.4%) given mFFX alone. Other AEs included thrombocytopenia, anemia, vomiting, and increased aminotransferase. Immune-related AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 3 patients in the sintilimab arm (5.7%) and pulmonary AEs occurred in 3 patients (5.7%) as well.

“From the study we conclude that from addition of the sinitilimab to the mFFX, we improved the ORR significantly for metastatic pancreatic cancer, but no superior OS and PFS were observed. The toxicity was manageable and acceptable until growth. These data suggest that a combination with PD-1 antibody may expand the benefit of the chemotherapy protocol,” said Liang.


Fu Q, Chen Y, Huang D, Guo C, et al. Randomized phase III study of sintilimab in combination with modified folfrinox versus folfrinox alone in patients with metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer in China: The CISPD3 trial. Presented at: 2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. January 20-22, 2022. Abstract 560.

Related Videos
An expert from the University of California, Los Angeles suggests that the NALIRIFOX may be a beneficial treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who receive NALIRIFOX tend to have more gastrointestinal toxicity while nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine results in more cytopenias, according to an expert from University of California, Los Angeles.
An expert from the University of California, Los Angeles described the purpose and design of the phase 3 NAPOLI-3 study, assessing NALIRIFOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
An expert from the Mayo Clinic discusses how findings from the ongoing phase 3 MOUNTAINEER trial may enable access to tucatinib, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy in earlier lines of treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer.
Shubham Pant, MD, highlights the importance of tailoring treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer by exploring biomarkers.
Zev A. Wainberg, MD, discusses future research efforts for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, detailed the evolution of treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma prior to the phase 3 HIMALAYA study and the reasons for launching the trial.
Related Content