Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology Brothers
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Study Links Virus to Some Cases of Common Skin Cancer

September 11, 2009
Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 23 No 10
Volume 23
Issue 10

A virus discovered last year in a rare form of skin cancer has also been found in people with the second most common form of skin cancer among Americans, according to researchers at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute. Their findings were published online June 25, 2009, by the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

A virus discovered last year in a rare form of skin cancer has also been found in people with the second most common form of skin cancer among Americans, according to researchers at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute. Their findings were published online June 25, 2009, by the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

The researchers examined tissue samples from 58 people with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), a highly curable form of skin cancer that is expected to affect more than 200,000 Americans this year.

They identified the virus in more than one-third of the patients and in 15% of the tumors tested. In addition, all of the virus found in tumor cells had a mutation that could enable the viral DNA to integrate into the DNA of the host cell.

“This is indirect evidence that the virus might play a role in causing some cases of squamous cell carcinoma,” says principal investigator Amanda E. Toland, PhD, assistant professor of molecular virology, immunology and medical genetics and a researcher with the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute.

The virus was first discovered in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, a rare, aggressive skin cancer that occurs mainly in the elderly and people with a suppressed immune system. The people in the new study all had a healthy immune system.

“Originally it was thought that this virus caused only this rare skin cancer, but our findings indicate that it is a lot more prevalent than we initially thought,” said Dr. Toland.

More Than One-Third Tested Positive
The investigators detected the virus in 26 of 177 SCC samples, 11 of 63 adjacent-skin samples, and 1 sample from a mouthwash. They found no viral DNA in any of the blood samples from 57 patients. In all, 21 of 58 SCC patients, or 36%, tested positive for the virus.

By sequencing the viral DNA from 31 normal and tumor samples, the researchers showed that the same mutation was present in all the viruses tested from tumors, and in 60% of the viruses tested from adjacent healthy-looking tissue.

“That suggests that the virus may develop a mutation that causes it to integrate into host-cell DNA, and, therefore, may play a role in causing the cancer,” said Dr. Toland.

Articles in this issue

Radical Prostatectomy Reigns Supreme
Localized Prostate Cancer: The Battle of Treatment Options Enters the Larger Arena
Ginger
Ginger
More Questions About Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Preoperative Therapy for Early-Stage NSCLC: Opportunities and Challenges
FDA Approves First Maintenance Drug Therapy for Advanced Lung Cancer
Accelerated Approval Granted for Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma
New Opioid Pain Reliever Approved With Required Risk-Reduction Plan
FDA Extends Review of Ofatumumab
Degarelix for Advanced Prostate Cancer Gets Trade Name
KRAS Safety Update Added to Panitumumab Prescribing Information
FDA Issues Final Rules to Help Patients Gain Access to Investigational Drugs
SGO White Paper Explores HPV Vaccine’s Impact on Cervical Cancer Prevention
New Fertility Treatment Option Available for Cancer Patients

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Experts on myeloma
Related Content

A phase 3 trial evaluating frontline IFx-2.0 with pembrolizumab in advanced/metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma is planned to start later in June 2025.

FDA Lifts Hold on IFx-2.0 in Advanced/Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Roman Fabbricatore
June 9th 2025
Article

A phase 3 trial evaluating frontline IFx-2.0 with pembrolizumab in advanced/metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma is planned to start later in June 2025.


OncView™ Podcast: Immunotherapy Response Monitoring in Melanoma

OncView™ Podcast: Immunotherapy Response Monitoring in Melanoma

John M. Kirkwood, MD
April 8th 2022
Podcast

John Kirkwood, MD, PhD, discussed considerations for treating patients with melanoma using immunotherapy and how to properly monitor responses.


No Improvement in RFS With Adjuvant Nivolumab/Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma

No Improvement in RFS With Adjuvant Nivolumab/Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma

Kristi Rosa
June 3rd 2025
Article

Compared with nivolumab alone, nivolumab/relatlimab did not improve RFS in patients with resected stage III to IV melanoma.


On this episode of CancerNetwork’s podcast, Emily Smith, MD, discussed a patient case of basal cell carcinoma she and colleagues published in the journal ONCOLOGY.

Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go: Patient Case of Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma Arising From a Carcinosarcoma

Matthew Fowler;Emily Hoffman Smith, MD
February 14th 2022
Podcast

On this episode of the Oncology® Peer Review On-The-Go, Emily Smith, MD, discussed a patient case of basal cell carcinoma she and colleagues published in the journal ONCOLOGY®.


Efficacy across most patient subgroups appeared to be consistent with relatlimab/nivolumab vs ipilimumab/nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma.

Relatlimab Shows Comparable Efficacy to Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

Roman Fabbricatore
June 1st 2025
Article

Efficacy across most patient subgroups appeared to be consistent with relatlimab/nivolumab vs ipilimumab/nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma.


42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

Ana Sandoval;Joyce A. O’Shaughnessy;Astra M. Liepa;Brenda Grimes;Katheryn Moreira;James Roose;Catherine Keane;Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH
May 29th 2025
Article
Related Content

A phase 3 trial evaluating frontline IFx-2.0 with pembrolizumab in advanced/metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma is planned to start later in June 2025.

FDA Lifts Hold on IFx-2.0 in Advanced/Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Roman Fabbricatore
June 9th 2025
Article

A phase 3 trial evaluating frontline IFx-2.0 with pembrolizumab in advanced/metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma is planned to start later in June 2025.


OncView™ Podcast: Immunotherapy Response Monitoring in Melanoma

OncView™ Podcast: Immunotherapy Response Monitoring in Melanoma

John M. Kirkwood, MD
April 8th 2022
Podcast

John Kirkwood, MD, PhD, discussed considerations for treating patients with melanoma using immunotherapy and how to properly monitor responses.


No Improvement in RFS With Adjuvant Nivolumab/Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma

No Improvement in RFS With Adjuvant Nivolumab/Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma

Kristi Rosa
June 3rd 2025
Article

Compared with nivolumab alone, nivolumab/relatlimab did not improve RFS in patients with resected stage III to IV melanoma.


On this episode of CancerNetwork’s podcast, Emily Smith, MD, discussed a patient case of basal cell carcinoma she and colleagues published in the journal ONCOLOGY.

Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go: Patient Case of Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma Arising From a Carcinosarcoma

Matthew Fowler;Emily Hoffman Smith, MD
February 14th 2022
Podcast

On this episode of the Oncology® Peer Review On-The-Go, Emily Smith, MD, discussed a patient case of basal cell carcinoma she and colleagues published in the journal ONCOLOGY®.


Efficacy across most patient subgroups appeared to be consistent with relatlimab/nivolumab vs ipilimumab/nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma.

Relatlimab Shows Comparable Efficacy to Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

Roman Fabbricatore
June 1st 2025
Article

Efficacy across most patient subgroups appeared to be consistent with relatlimab/nivolumab vs ipilimumab/nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma.


42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

Ana Sandoval;Joyce A. O’Shaughnessy;Astra M. Liepa;Brenda Grimes;Katheryn Moreira;James Roose;Catherine Keane;Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH
May 29th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.