Those With Acalabrutinib-Intolerant B-Cell Malignancies Appear to Benefit From Zanubrutinib

Patients with B-cell malignancies intolerant to acalabrutinib appeared to derive clinically meaningful benefit from zanubrutinib.

Clinically meaningful benefit was observed following treatment with zanubrutinib (Brukinsa) in a population of patients with B-cell malignancies who were intolerant to acalabrutinib (Calquence), according to updated results from the ongoing phase 2 BGB-3111-215 trial (NCT04116437) that were presented at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting.

Among 18 efficacy-evaluable patients, the disease control rate (DCR), defined as stable disease or better, was 94% (95% CI, 72.7%-99.9%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 61% (95% CI,35.7%-82.7%). The median time to best overall response and the median time to first overall response were both 3 months (range, 2.7-11.1).

Eligible patients in cohort 2 (n = 21) in BGB-3111-215 had been previously treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 13), small lymphocytic leukemia (n = 2), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 1), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 2), andWaldenström macroglobulinemia (n = 3), and were intolerant to a prior BTK inhibitor. Patients in cohort 2 were intolerant to acalabrutinib and received zanubrutinib at a dose of 160 mg twice daily (67%) or 320 mg once a day (33%). Patients who were intolerant only to ibrutinib were enrolled to cohort 1 (n = 57) and were not included in this analysis.

Inclusion criteria for acalabrutinib intolerance that led to discontinuation of treatment was defined as: grade 1 or greater nonhematologic toxicity for more than 7 days or of any duration with over 3 recurrent episodes, grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity for any duration, grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection, grade 4 hematologic toxicity that was persistent until discontinuation of BTK inhibitor, inability to use acid-reducing or anticoagulant agents due to the BTK inhibitor, and resolution of a grade 2 or higher BTK inhibitor to grade 1 or below or baseline with resolution of grade 1 toxicities to 0 or baseline before beginning zanubrutinib treatment. Exclusion criteria solely included disease progression during the previous treatment with a BTK inhibitor.

The primary objective of the study was evaluating safety based on the recurrence and change in

severity of AEs associated with acalabrutinib. Secondary objectives included ORR, DCR, progression-free survival, and patient-reported outcomes. Previous findings from the trial demonstrated that zanubrutinib was well tolerated in patients with B-cell malignancies who were intolerant to ibruntinib (Imbruvica) and/or acalabrutinib.

Safety results from the analysis demonstrated that in cohort 2,75% of acalabrutinib any grade adverse events (AEs) did not occur during zanubrutinib treatment and there were no acalabrutinib AEs that recurred at a high severity. Additionally, 67% of patients did not experience any recurrence of previously experienced AEs.

The cumulative exposure to acalabrutinib prior to discontinuation was 4.6 months, however 67% of patients did not experience a recurrence of prior acalabrutinib intolerance events after a median of 7.6 months of zanubrutnib treatment. When examining AE recurrence, 19% of patients experienced the same grade, 6% experienced a lower grade, and 75% of patients had no recurrence at all when treated with zanubrutnib.

With a median follow-up of 8.6 months (range, 0.1- 23.8), the median duration of zanubrutinib treatment was 7.6 months (range, 0.1-23.8). Most patients (81%) remain on the study with 76% remaining on treatment. Five (24%) patients discontinued treatment because of an AE (2), 1 because of disease progression), and 2 due to withdrawal by patient. One patient died from progressive disease.

Two of the patients that discontinued treatment experienced recurrence of a prior acalabrutinib intolerance event and 52% of patients had a dose interruption due an AE while 14% had an event that led to dose reduction. Out of 3 patients who experienced the same intolerance event with ibrutinib and acalabrutinib treatments, 2 did not have a recurrence on zanubrutinib and one patient had a lower grade recurrence.

When examining the kinase selectivity of zanubrutinib, ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and acalabrutinib’s major metabolite (M27), zanubrutinib had the highest selectivity. Inhibition at rates of 50% of greater were recorded in 7, 17, 15, and 23 kinases, respectively, of the 370 tested. The treatment of B-cell malignancies with BTK inhibitors can be limited by AEs but the investigators noted that zanubrutinib was “designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target kinase binding and associated AEs.”

Patients in cohort 2 had a median age of 73 years (range, 51-87) and had received a median of 2 (range, 1-6) prior BTK treatments. The prior BTK inhibitor therapies were ibrutinib monotherapy, ibrutinib combination therapy, acalabrutinib monotherapy, and acalabrutinib combination therapy with patients receiving the treatments at rates of 48%, 4.8%, 95%, 4.8% of the treatments, respectively. The median acalabrutinib exposure was 4.6 months (range, 0.2-26.9).

Investigators noted that there were no decreases in atrial fibrillation, anemia, or thrombocytopenia/platelet count following treatment. The most common AEs of any grade were fatigue (29%), diarrhea (24%), hypertension (24%), arthralgia (19%), cough (19%), myalgia (19%), and COVID-19 (14%). Nineteen percent of patients experienced a grade 3 or higher AE with 2 patients experiencing a decrease in neutrophil count, which was the only grade 3 or higher AE that occurred in more than 1 patient.


Shadman M, Flinn IW, Kingsley EC, et al. Zanubrutinib in acalabrutinib-intolerant patients (Pts) with B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2022;140(suppl 1):3655-3657. doi:10.1182/blood-2022-159726

Related Videos
An expert from Weill Cornell Medicine highlights key clinical data indicating the benefits of radium-223 in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
The risk of radionuclide exposure to the public reflects one reason urologists need to collaborate with radiation oncologists when administering radiopharmaceuticals to patients with prostate cancer.
Switching out beta emitters for alpha emitters, including radium-223, is one way to improve radiopharmaceutical treatment of prostate cancer, according to an expert from Weill Cornell Medicine.
Data demonstrate the feasibility of automated glomerular filtration rate prediction to decide between partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in kidney cancer, according to an expert from the Cleveland Clinic.
Early phase trials investigating cellular therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates for refractory kidney cancer may uncover strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms.
Increasing cancer antigen presentation as well as working with tumor cells in and delivering novel cells to the microenvironment may help in overcoming mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in refractory renal cell carcinoma.
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab appears to be the best option for patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are progressing on immunotherapy combinations or are lenvatinib naïve.
Ipilimumab monotherapy does not appear effective in driving complete responses in refractory renal cell carcinoma despite yielding some progression-free survival intervals, according to an expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
An expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center discusses several phase 3 clinical trials supporting the use of various single-agent and combination immunotherapy regimens for advanced kidney cancer.
Shilpa Gupta, MD, shares the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and highlights other options that may be suitable for some patients.
Related Content