Those With Acalabrutinib-Intolerant B-Cell Malignancies Appear to Benefit From Zanubrutinib


Patients with B-cell malignancies intolerant to acalabrutinib appeared to derive clinically meaningful benefit from zanubrutinib.

Clinically meaningful benefit was observed following treatment with zanubrutinib (Brukinsa) in a population of patients with B-cell malignancies who were intolerant to acalabrutinib (Calquence), according to updated results from the ongoing phase 2 BGB-3111-215 trial (NCT04116437) that were presented at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting.

Among 18 efficacy-evaluable patients, the disease control rate (DCR), defined as stable disease or better, was 94% (95% CI, 72.7%-99.9%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 61% (95% CI,35.7%-82.7%). The median time to best overall response and the median time to first overall response were both 3 months (range, 2.7-11.1).

Eligible patients in cohort 2 (n = 21) in BGB-3111-215 had been previously treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 13), small lymphocytic leukemia (n = 2), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 1), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 2), andWaldenström macroglobulinemia (n = 3), and were intolerant to a prior BTK inhibitor. Patients in cohort 2 were intolerant to acalabrutinib and received zanubrutinib at a dose of 160 mg twice daily (67%) or 320 mg once a day (33%). Patients who were intolerant only to ibrutinib were enrolled to cohort 1 (n = 57) and were not included in this analysis.

Inclusion criteria for acalabrutinib intolerance that led to discontinuation of treatment was defined as: grade 1 or greater nonhematologic toxicity for more than 7 days or of any duration with over 3 recurrent episodes, grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity for any duration, grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection, grade 4 hematologic toxicity that was persistent until discontinuation of BTK inhibitor, inability to use acid-reducing or anticoagulant agents due to the BTK inhibitor, and resolution of a grade 2 or higher BTK inhibitor to grade 1 or below or baseline with resolution of grade 1 toxicities to 0 or baseline before beginning zanubrutinib treatment. Exclusion criteria solely included disease progression during the previous treatment with a BTK inhibitor.

The primary objective of the study was evaluating safety based on the recurrence and change in

severity of AEs associated with acalabrutinib. Secondary objectives included ORR, DCR, progression-free survival, and patient-reported outcomes. Previous findings from the trial demonstrated that zanubrutinib was well tolerated in patients with B-cell malignancies who were intolerant to ibruntinib (Imbruvica) and/or acalabrutinib.

Safety results from the analysis demonstrated that in cohort 2,75% of acalabrutinib any grade adverse events (AEs) did not occur during zanubrutinib treatment and there were no acalabrutinib AEs that recurred at a high severity. Additionally, 67% of patients did not experience any recurrence of previously experienced AEs.

The cumulative exposure to acalabrutinib prior to discontinuation was 4.6 months, however 67% of patients did not experience a recurrence of prior acalabrutinib intolerance events after a median of 7.6 months of zanubrutnib treatment. When examining AE recurrence, 19% of patients experienced the same grade, 6% experienced a lower grade, and 75% of patients had no recurrence at all when treated with zanubrutnib.

With a median follow-up of 8.6 months (range, 0.1- 23.8), the median duration of zanubrutinib treatment was 7.6 months (range, 0.1-23.8). Most patients (81%) remain on the study with 76% remaining on treatment. Five (24%) patients discontinued treatment because of an AE (2), 1 because of disease progression), and 2 due to withdrawal by patient. One patient died from progressive disease.

Two of the patients that discontinued treatment experienced recurrence of a prior acalabrutinib intolerance event and 52% of patients had a dose interruption due an AE while 14% had an event that led to dose reduction. Out of 3 patients who experienced the same intolerance event with ibrutinib and acalabrutinib treatments, 2 did not have a recurrence on zanubrutinib and one patient had a lower grade recurrence.

When examining the kinase selectivity of zanubrutinib, ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and acalabrutinib’s major metabolite (M27), zanubrutinib had the highest selectivity. Inhibition at rates of 50% of greater were recorded in 7, 17, 15, and 23 kinases, respectively, of the 370 tested. The treatment of B-cell malignancies with BTK inhibitors can be limited by AEs but the investigators noted that zanubrutinib was “designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target kinase binding and associated AEs.”

Patients in cohort 2 had a median age of 73 years (range, 51-87) and had received a median of 2 (range, 1-6) prior BTK treatments. The prior BTK inhibitor therapies were ibrutinib monotherapy, ibrutinib combination therapy, acalabrutinib monotherapy, and acalabrutinib combination therapy with patients receiving the treatments at rates of 48%, 4.8%, 95%, 4.8% of the treatments, respectively. The median acalabrutinib exposure was 4.6 months (range, 0.2-26.9).

Investigators noted that there were no decreases in atrial fibrillation, anemia, or thrombocytopenia/platelet count following treatment. The most common AEs of any grade were fatigue (29%), diarrhea (24%), hypertension (24%), arthralgia (19%), cough (19%), myalgia (19%), and COVID-19 (14%). Nineteen percent of patients experienced a grade 3 or higher AE with 2 patients experiencing a decrease in neutrophil count, which was the only grade 3 or higher AE that occurred in more than 1 patient.


Shadman M, Flinn IW, Kingsley EC, et al. Zanubrutinib in acalabrutinib-intolerant patients (Pts) with B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2022;140(suppl 1):3655-3657. doi:10.1182/blood-2022-159726

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content