Adjuvant Capecitabine Improves Survival in Residual Invasive Breast Cancer

Article

Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy benefit from adjuvant treatment with capecitabine.

Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy benefit from adjuvant treatment with capecitabine, according to results of a new randomized study.

“Patients who have residual invasive breast cancer after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a high risk of relapse,” wrote study authors led by Norikazu Masuda, MD, PhD, of Osaka National Hospital in Japan. Appropriate treatment in these patients was previously unclear; capecitabine has been shown to be effective in metastatic breast cancer patients, and is used as a second-line therapy when patients are resistant to anthracycline therapy, taxane therapy, or both.

The new CREATE-X study randomized 910 patients with HER2-negative residual invasive breast cancer who had been treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane chemotherapy to either post-surgical capecitabine or no such therapy (455 patients in each group). Results of the study were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

A prespecified interim analysis showed that the study had met its primary endpoint and was thus terminated early, after a median follow-up of 3.6 years. At 3 years, 82.8% of capecitabine patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer, compared with 73.9% of control patients. At 5 years, these rates were 74.1% and 67.6%. The hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence, second cancer, or death was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.53–0.92; P = .01).

For overall survival (OS), the 3-year rate was 94.0% with capecitabine and 88.9% without; at 5 years, these rates were 89.2% and 83.6%. The HR for OS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.39–0.90; P = .01).

Specifically among patients with triple-negative disease, the disease-free survival rate was 69.8% in capecitabine patients and 56.1% in control patients; the HR for recurrence, second cancer, or death in these patients was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.39–0.87). The OS rate was 78.8% vs 70.3%, respectively, and the HR for death was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.30–0.90). The differences were not significant in patients with hormone receptor–positive disease.

The therapy was generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event in the capecitabine group was hand-foot syndrome, occurring in 73.4% of patients; 11.1% had a grade 3 event. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity; serious events deemed related to capecitabine were observed in 4 patients, and included neutropenia, diarrhea, epigastric pain, and abdominal pain.

“Capecitabine showed effectiveness as an adjuvant option in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who had residual invasive disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” the authors concluded.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight the many advantages to attending the 42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, with some additional tidbits to round out the main event.
3 experts in this video
3 experts in this video
Related Content