Adrenocortical Carcinoma at Low/Intermediate Recurrence Risk Does Not Benefit From Postoperative Adjuvant Mitotane

Efficacy of adjuvant mitotane for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma following surgery was presented at 2022 ASCO GU.

Postoperative mitotane treatment in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and low-to-intermediate recurrence risk did not lead to significant benefits, according to data presented at the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

“Adrenocortical carcinoma is an extremely rare malignancy with an expected incidence of about 0.7 [to] 2 new cases per million population per year in the western countries,” explained lead author Alfredo Berruti, MD, during the presentation of the data. “Surgery is the main stay of therapy; however, due to the rarity, the diagnosis is often delayed so that the surgery is usually feasible in about 50% of patients [who] have presentation. Even if radically operated [on, patients with] adrenocortical carcinoma are at high risk of relapse.”

Ninety-one patients were enrolled in ADIUVO, all of whom had stages I to III ACC, had undergone R0 resection, and had a Ki-67 percentage of 10.

Of the enrolled patients, 45 received adjuvant mitotane and 46 were observed. The median age (51 vs 50.5 years for the mitotane and observation arms, respectively), gender proportion (female, 73% vs 67%), percentage of patients with stage I ACC (20% vs 26%), percentage of patients with stage II ACC (67% vs 63%), percentage of patients with stage III ACC (13% vs 11%), ACC secretion (44% vs 36%), and Weiss score (5 vs 5) were relatively matched for both arms.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant mitotane or active surveillance. Those who received adjuvant mitotane were administered a starting dose of 1.5 g per day, and if tolerated well, an increased dose from 2 g to 3 g per day on day 2, an increased dose of 3 g to 4.5 g per day on day 3, and an increased dose of 4 g to 6 g per day on day 4. After reaching 6 g per day, patients were administered this dose until first mitotane blood level was estimated.

The primary end point of ADIUVO was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and safety.

If patients refused randomization, they were eligible for enrollment in the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study. This was a prospective study, where patients were managed in parallel with the ADIUVO study without the aspect of randomization. Of these patients, 42 received adjuvant mitotane and 53 went untreated. Similarly, baseline characteristics were matched between the 2 arms. This cohort was evaluated with the ADIUVO cohort to make up for low patient recruitment.

Results of the ADIUVO study showed that there were 8 recurrences in the adjuvant mitotane arm and 11 recurrences in the observation arm at a median follow up of 48 months. There were also 2 deaths in the adjuvant mitotane arm and 5 deaths in the observation arm; however, there was no significant difference between the RFS and OS when comparing the 2 arms.

In addition, investigators found that the HR for recurrence was 1.321 (95% CI, 0.55-3.32; P = .54) and the HR for death was 2.171 (95% CI, 0.52-12.12; P = .29) in the observational arm.

As for the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study, results confirmed those of ADIUVO. The number needed to treat (NNT) was determined as 55.

Given a 5-year RFS of 75%, the authors of this study pointed out that the findings do not support postoperative adjuvant mitotane treatment in patients with ACC at low-intermediate risk of recurrence, and that these outcomes provide “an important step toward personalization of ACC care.”

In his concluding remarks, Berruti said, “Of course, the smaller size than planned due to early interruption and the low accrual rate is the main limitation of this trial, however it should be noted that patients meeting the eligibility criteria of the ADIUVO trial have a relatively good outcomes, since they have a 25% risk of relapse and 14% risk of death at 5 years. So, 70% of patients could potentially be cured with surgery only.”


Berruti A, Fassnacht M, Libè R, et al. First randomized trial on adjuvant mitotane in adrenocortical carcinoma patients: The Adjuvo study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):1. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.001

Related Videos
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute indicates that patients with prostate cancer who have 1 risk factor should undergo salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy before their prostate-specific antigen level rises above 0.25 ng/ml.
An expert from Weill Cornell Medicine highlights key clinical data indicating the benefits of radium-223 in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
The risk of radionuclide exposure to the public reflects one reason urologists need to collaborate with radiation oncologists when administering radiopharmaceuticals to patients with prostate cancer.
Switching out beta emitters for alpha emitters, including radium-223, is one way to improve radiopharmaceutical treatment of prostate cancer, according to an expert from Weill Cornell Medicine.
Data demonstrate the feasibility of automated glomerular filtration rate prediction to decide between partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in kidney cancer, according to an expert from the Cleveland Clinic.
Early phase trials investigating cellular therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates for refractory kidney cancer may uncover strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms.
Increasing cancer antigen presentation as well as working with tumor cells in and delivering novel cells to the microenvironment may help in overcoming mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in refractory renal cell carcinoma.
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab appears to be the best option for patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are progressing on immunotherapy combinations or are lenvatinib naïve.
Ipilimumab monotherapy does not appear effective in driving complete responses in refractory renal cell carcinoma despite yielding some progression-free survival intervals, according to an expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
An expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center discusses several phase 3 clinical trials supporting the use of various single-agent and combination immunotherapy regimens for advanced kidney cancer.
Related Content