AR-V7 Variant Testing in Prostate Cancer Could Reduce Treatment Costs

Article

Determining the presence of AR-V7 in prostate cancer patients could potentially save the US healthcare system $150 million each year by preventing unnecessary treatment.

Determining the presence of the androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) in prostate cancer patients prior to treatment could potentially save the US healthcare system $150 million each year, according to a study published in The Prostate.

The presence of AR-V7 can confer resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide, two widely used therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Researchers led by Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, MD, assistant professor of oncology at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, sought to determine whether AR-V7 testing among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) would result in decreased costs for the US healthcare system.

The test would spare men who were AR-V7-positive (AR-V7 > 5%) from incurring the cost of treatment with either abiraterone or enzalutamide, Antonarakis told Cancer Network. Currently, abiraterone and enzalutamide cost approximately $7,000 per month, and it can take 3 months of treatment for clinicians to determine if the therapy is working.

“We had hypothesized that AR-V7 testing would lead to cost savings by avoiding the expense of abiraterone and enzalutamide in AR-V7-positive patients, in whom these drugs would be expected to be largely ineffective,” said Antonarakis. “But we were surprised when we discovered that these cost savings might be as high as $150 million per year” in the United States.

There are approximately 30,000 men in the United States with metastatic CRPC, according to the study, and the prevalence of those with AR-V7 is about 30%. The researchers estimated that the AR-V7 test would cost $1,000 per patient.

“The remarkable thing was that AR-V7 testing would still be cost-effective even if the prevalence of AR-V7 detection was as low as 10%, or if the cost of the AR-V7 assay was as high as $2,000 per test,” Antonarakis noted.

Next, the study authors will analyze the potential clinical utility of AR-V7 testing. “In other words,” said Antonarakis, “does AR-V7 testing result in changes to the decision-making process in the clinic and how?”

For this analysis, the researchers will send questionnaires to all physicians who are ordering clinical-grade AR-V7 tests at Johns Hopkins and ask them how the test results will change their management of patients.

Related Videos
Two women in genitourinary oncology discuss their experiences with figuring out when to begin a family and how to prioritize both work and children.
Over the past few decades, the prostate cancer space has evolved with increased funding for clinical trial creation and enrollment.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Related Content