ASCO GI: Oral Chemo S-1 Increases Survival in Pancreatic Cancer, Japanese Study Shows

Article

An oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, used as an adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with resected pancreatic cancer has shown an improved overall survival compared with the standard adjuvant therapy gemcitabine (Gemzar).

The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1, used as an adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with resected pancreatic cancer, has shown an improved overall survival compared with the standard adjuvant therapy gemcitabine (Gemzar). The results of the Japanese JASPAC-01 phase III trial were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2013 Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers Symposium held January 24–26 in San Francisco (abstract #145).

Pancreatic tumor cells stained with an immunocytochemical stain with methyl green in the background; magnified to 400×

This noninferiority trial showed that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was not only noninferior but, in fact, was superior to gemcitabine. Previous studies of S-1 in Asian populations had suggested that S-1 was noninferior to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients.

“Our survival data were much stronger than expected. Based on these results, we hope that guidelines for standard postoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer in Japan will be changed to replace gemcitabine with S-1 as single-agent therapy,” said Katsuhiko Uesaka, MD, PhD, medical deputy director at Shizuoka Cancer Center and lead author of the trial, in a press release.

All 385 patients in the trial had stage I to III pancreatic adenocarcinoma that had been surgically resected. Patients were randomized 10 weeks after surgery to either six courses of gemcitabine or S-1 given twice daily for 4 weeks and repeated every 6 weeks for four courses.

The 2-year survival rates were 70% for the S-1 arm compared with 53% for the gemcitabine arm (hazard ratio = 0.56; P < .001). Relapse-free survival at 2 years was 49% for patients in the S-1 arm compared with 29% for patients in the gemcitabine arm.

Patients in the S-1 arm had a 44% lower risk of mortality at 2 years compared with those on the gemcitabine regimen.

The major grade 3 and 4 toxicities in the S-1 and gemcitabine arms included fatigue (5.4% vs 4.7%, respectively), anorexia (8% vs 5.4%), leucopenia (8.6% vs 38.7%), thrombocytopenia (4.3% vs 9.4%), anemia (13.4% vs 17.3%), and elevated AST (1.1% vs 5.2%).

GI side effect profiles are different for Asian and white patients taking S-1. The GI side effects are more severe for white patients due to differences in the metabolic processing of the drug, requiring lower doses of the oral chemotherapy. Uesaka indicated that for these reasons, these trial results cannot be extrapolated to non-Asian populations.

S-1 is available in Europe and several Asian countries, where the drug is approved as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer in combination with cisplatin. It is not yet approved in the United States, though a phase III gastric cancer trial is underway in the United States.

Related Videos
Increasing screening for younger individuals who are at risk of colorectal cancer may help mitigate the rising early incidence of this disease.
Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.
Rahul Gosain, MD; Sam Klempner, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Sam Klempner, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Sam Klempner, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Sam Klempner, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Sam Klempner, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.