Assessing ctDNA as a Predictor of RT Responses in Gynecologic Cancers

Feature
Video

Investigators evaluated ctDNA as a potentially noninvasive method to predict response to radiotherapy among those with gynecologic malignancies.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, A. Gabriella Wernicke, MD, MSc, detailed the rationale for assessing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a potential predictor of response to radiotherapy or chemoradiation in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Wernicke, a clinical professor at Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell and radiation oncologist at Lenox Hill Hospital of Northwell Health Cancer Institute in New Hyde Park, New York, presented this study at the 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting.

After receiving institutional review board (IRB) approval, Wernicke and colleagues assessed 29 evaluable patients with vaginal, vulvar, vaginal, cervical, and recurrent endometrial cancer who received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy from 2022 to 2024. Using a personalized, tumor-informed mPCR-NGS ctDNA assay, investigators assessed ctDNA samples before, during, and after radiation-based treatment to test their hypothesis that ctDNA was predictive of treatment response in this population. Overall, ctDNA demonstrated feasibility as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of radiotherapy or chemoradiation, and larger prospective evaluation of these findings is underway.

Wernicke stated that she wanted to thank the ASTRO Scientific Committee for selecting her group’s work for an oral presentation at the meeting.

Transcript:

The management of [gynecologic] malignancies with radiation or chemotherapy and radiation in combination remains quite a challenge, as radiation causes toxicity, and the outcomes of treatment may not be known for months after therapy. So early identification of response with ctDNA blood draw may provide a noninvasive way to predict response to treatment.

We obtained an IRB approval and looked at patients with the following [gynecologic]malignancies: vaginal cancer, vulvar cancer, cervical cancer, and recurrent endometrial cancer. These patients were treated between the periods of 2022 and 2024 and then analyzed in a retrospective manner. We collected samples of ctDNA at the following time points: pre-treatment with radiation or chemoradiation, midway through their treatment, and at the end of treatment. Subsequently, we did longitudinal testing by obtaining ctDNA at 1, 3, and 6 months and 6 months thereafter. Unless the patient progressed or recurred, then our testing was more frequent at every 3 months. ctDNA analysis was used by performing a personalized tumor-informed mPCR-NGS ctDNA assay.

Reference

Wernicke G, Gui B, Shalamov MM, et al. Early assessment of response using ctDNA as a non-invasive biomarker in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing radiotherapy. Presented at: 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; September 29-October 2, 2024; Washington, DC. Abstract 106.

Recent Videos
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.
Health care organizations have come together to form the Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition to address gaps in supportive cancer care services.
Further optimizing a PROTAC that targets MDM2 may lead to human clinical trials among patients with cancer harboring p53 mutations.
As patients are nearing the end of life, different management strategies, such as opioids, may be needed to help mitigate pain or fatigue.
Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, highlights the importance of having end-of-life discussions early in a patient’s cancer treatment course.
Patients treated with BCMA-directed immunotherapies for myeloma may experience susceptibility to severe infections following treatment.
BCMA testing tracks clinical changes faster without the need for marker expression vs monoclonal immunoglobulin, a conventional multiple myeloma marker.
Related Content