Baseline AFP Levels Affect Ramucirumab Benefit in HCC

Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma patients with baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels greater than 400 ng/mL may derive greater benefit from second-line ramucirumab.

CT of a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow): arterial phase

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may derive greater benefit from treatment with second-line ramucirumab if their baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are greater than 400 ng/mL, according to the results of the REACH study.

“Further analysis from the REACH study have identified AFP as a potential marker for selecting patients who may benefit from ramucirumab treatment in advanced HCC,” said Andrew X. Zhu, MD, from Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, during his presentation at the 2015 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. “A robust and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival was observed in the population with elevated baseline AFP level.”

In REACH, patients with HCC with prior sorafenib treatment were randomly assigned to ramucirumab 8 mg/kg and best supportive care (n = 272)  or placebo plus best supportive care (n = 272). At randomization, patients were stratified by geographic region or the etiology of the underlying disease.

The primary analysis results of REACH in patients with HCC were presented previously. Analysis of the intent-to-treat population showed no significant overall survival advantage for patients assigned to ramucirumab compared with those assigned placebo (9.2 months vs 7.6 months; P = .1391).

A forest plot of overall survival by subgroup showed that those patients with an AFP greater than 400 ng/mL derived an overall survival benefit from treatment with ramucirumab. According to Zhu, prior studies have also demonstrated an association between elevated baseline AFP levels and poor prognosis in HCC. Therefore, in this updated analysis of REACH, the researchers studied the relationship between baseline AFP and ramucirumab treatment effect.

Treatment with ramucirumab resulted in a significant survival advantage for patients with a baseline AFP level of 400 ng/mL or greater (7.8 months vs 4.2 months; HR = 0.674; P = .0059), but did not confer a survival advantage among patients with lower baseline AFP levels (10.1 months vs 11.8 months).

The researchers found that the group with an AFP level of 400 ng/mL or greater had a greater proportion of patients with underlying BCLC stage C disease, underlying hepatitis B, the presence of macrovascular invasion, and age greater than 65 years. There were also fewer patients in this group with an ECOG performance status of 0.

“In a post-hoc analysis of REACH, ramucirumab treatment led to a greater reduction in the risk of death in patients with progressively higher baseline AFP values,” Zhu said. “Further investigation of the relationship between baseline AFP level and angiogenesis inhibition is currently ongoing to better understand ramucirumab mechanism of action in HCC.”

Related Videos
Rates of obesity appear to correlate with increasing incidence of cancer in young populations, according to Monique Gary, DO, MSc, FACS.
An expert from the University of California, Los Angeles suggests that the NALIRIFOX may be a beneficial treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who receive NALIRIFOX tend to have more gastrointestinal toxicity while nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine results in more cytopenias, according to an expert from University of California, Los Angeles.
An expert from the University of California, Los Angeles described the purpose and design of the phase 3 NAPOLI-3 study, assessing NALIRIFOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Data from a ctDNA analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE study indicate that KIT mutational status may be associated with response to certain Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in GIST, according to an expert from the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Massachusetts.
An expert from the Mayo Clinic discusses how findings from the ongoing phase 3 MOUNTAINEER trial may enable access to tucatinib, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy in earlier lines of treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer.
Future research into the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma may involve combining local therapies with checkpoint inhibitors like durvalumab and tremelimumab, according to Ghassan K. Abou-Alda, MD.
Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who have recurrent disease following surgery or locally advanced diseases who will likely progress on local therapy may have an opportunity to benefit from tremelimumab and durvalumab following its FDA approval, according to Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD.
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, discusses the importance of improving access to novel therapies and combinations for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across the world.
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, spoke about the recent approval of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, based on results from the phase 3 HIMALAYA trial.
Related Content