Better Survival With Breast-Conserving Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Article

Women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy had significantly improved 10-year overall survival compared with women who underwent mastectomy without radiation therapy.

Sabine Siesling, PhD

Women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy had significantly improved 10-year overall survival compared with women who underwent mastectomy without radiation therapy, according to the results of a population-based study (abstract S3-05) presented at the 2015 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS).

In addition, the study found that breast-conserving therapy resulted in an improved distant metastasis-free survival compared with mastectomy in patients with T1, N0 breast cancer.

“The overall survival for breast-conserving therapy compared to mastectomy is better in every T and N stage,” said Sabine Siesling, PhD, senior research at the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, and professor at the University of Twente, Enschede, during a press conference. “Breast-conserving therapy should be the treatment of choice especially in smaller tumors.”

According to Siesling, previous trials have shown that breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy have similar rates of overall survival in women with early-stage breast cancer and some observational studies have shown that breast-conserving therapy may confer an improved overall survival.

“Most of these observational studies only followed patients for a maximum of 5 years. Since recurrences are described to occur after 5 years as well, getting more insight into the long-term outcomes after different type of surgery based on daily practice experience on a national level is of great importance,” Siesling said in a prepared statement.

In this study, the researchers looked at two cohorts of Dutch patients treated between 2000 and 2004 to determine if there was a difference in 10-year overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival when treated with breast-conserving therapy compared with mastectomy.

The first cohort looked at overall survival in 37,207 patients. Of these patients, 58.4% were treated with breast-conserving therapy. According to Siesling, these patients were younger and had smaller, well-differentiated, unifocal, ductal tumors.

The study found that patients assigned to breast-conserving therapy had a better overall survival than patients treated with mastectomy. After adjusting for confounding factors, there was a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–0.85; P < .001) in favor of better survival for patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy compared with mastectomy. According to Siesling, these results were similar in all the subgroups examined.

The second cohort of 7,552 patients looked at 10-year distant-metastasis free survival in a subgroup diagnosed in 2003 who had active follow-up registering all recurrent events within 10 years. In this group, 61.5% of patients had breast-conserving therapy and 38.5% had mastectomy. Distant metastasis occurred in 11% of the breast-conserving therapy patients and 14.7% of the mastectomy patients.

After correction for confounding variables, the difference in 10-year distant metastasis–free survival was not significantly different for the two groups (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–1.01]; P = .070). However, when the researchers looked at patients with T1, N0 disease there was a significant improvement in 10-year distant metastasis–free survival in favor of breast-conserving therapy (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58–0.94]; P = .014).

Siesling cautioned that observational studies are prone to confounding by indication. In this study, patients receiving breast-conserving therapy were younger and had more favorable tumor characteristics compared to patients receiving mastectomy. “We corrected for all of these factors in the multivariable analyses; however, we cannot completely rule out this phenomenon,” she said. “In addition, residual confounding caused by non-measured factors could also have altered the results. However, we do not expect these factors to overrule the large impact of all variables we included in the analyses.”

Recent Videos
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Carey Anders, MD, an expert on breast cancer
Related Content