Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin Combo Safe and Effective in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 11 No 1
Volume 11
Issue 1

LISBON, Portugal-The combination of capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (investigational in the United States) produced a 55% response rate in a phase II study of patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, Chris Twelves, MD, of Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, Scotland, said at the 11th European Cancer Conference (abstract 1005). In addition, he said, 32% of patients in the study had stable disease.

LISBON, Portugal—The combination of capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (investigational in the United States) produced a 55% response rate in a phase II study of patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, Chris Twelves, MD, of Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, Scotland, said at the 11th European Cancer Conference (abstract 1005). In addition, he said, 32% of patients in the study had stable disease.

Capecitabine is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine that is converted to fluorouracil (5-FU) at the tumor site by exploiting the higher activity of thymidine phosphorylase in malignant tissue, Dr. Twelves said. "It has demonstrated superior activity and an improved safety profile, compared with IV bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (Mayo Clinic regimen) in two large phase III trials," he said.

The current open-label, single-arm study enrolled 96 patients at 13 centers in eight countries. Patients received oral capecitabine, 1,000 mg/m² taken at home twice daily on days 1 to 14 of a 3-week cycle, and a 2-hour infusion of oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m² on day 1.

Dr. Twelves emphasized that patients on this regimen spend only a few hours in the clinic each month. In contrast, 5-FU/leucovorin is given as a continuous infusion for 48 hours every 2 weeks.

He pointed out that the 55% response rate was consistent across all subgroups, including patients with liver and lung metastases, patients who had received primary adjuvant chemotherapy, and patients with lower performance status. The average duration of response, he said, is currently 8 months, and the median time to progression is 7.1 months. Median survival, he noted, had not been reached 15 months after the start of the trial and 7 months after enrollment of the last patient. 

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and higher PD-L1 expression may benefit from treatment with tislelizumab, according to Syma Iqbal, MD.
Quantifying disease volume to help identify potential recurrence following surgery may be a helpful advance, according to Sean Dineen, MD.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.