Commentary (Bierman): High-Dose Therapy for Follicular Lymphoma

News
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 3
Volume 14
Issue 3

Randomized trials are defining the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), but there is less experience with this treatment in follicular lymphomas. Approximately 40% to 50% of patients with follicular NHL are in remission 4 to 5 years following autologous stem-cell transplantation. Results from phase II studies and retrospective analyses are remarkably similar, despite differences in patient populations, preparative regimens, use of purging, and source of stem cells. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of a plateau in disease-free survival curves, and we do not know whether patients are cured or overall survival is prolonged. Relapses 9 years following transplantation have been described.[1]

Randomized trials are defining the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), but there is less experience with this treatment in follicular lymphomas. Approximately 40% to 50% of patients with follicular NHL are in remission 4 to 5 years following autologous stem-cell transplantation. Results from phase II studies and retrospective analyses are remarkably similar, despite differences in patient populations, preparative regimens, use of purging, and source of stem cells. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of a plateau in disease-free survival curves, and we do not know whether patients are cured or overall survival is prolonged. Relapses 9 years following transplantation have been described.[1]

In their review, Freedman et al do not make recommendations about the timing of transplantation. Retrospective analyses show that results are better in patients with sensitive disease who have not been heavily pretreated. However, these patients are most likely to respond to any treatment modality. Decisions on timing have become more difficult since the introduction of rituximab (Rituxan), and likely will be further complicated when the iodine-131–labeled anti-CD20 antibody (tositumomab [Bexxar]) soon becomes available.

The authors also discuss the role of autologous transplantation in patients whose disease has undergone histologic transformation. They report that prolonged disease-free survival is possible for these patients but that no survival plateau has been achieved.[2] A European Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (EBMTR) analysis estimated the 5-year progression-free survival rate to be 33% for patients with transformed lymphoma.[3] Results were similar to patients without transformation, and the authors came to the same conclusion as do Freedman et al; namely, that autologous stem-cell transplantation is a reasonable approach, at least for patients with sensitive disease.

Transplantation During First Remission

The apparent lack of a plateau in disease-free survival following autologous transplantation for relapsed follicular NHL has led to trials of transplantation during first remission. Unfortunately, results from the Dana-Farber group and others have failed to document a survival plateau in these patients.[4,5] The group’s projected 3-year overall survival rate of 89% does offer the hope that autologous transplantation may prolong overall survival, however.

Investigators at Stanford performed autologous stem-cell transplantation in 37 patients with follicular NHL in first remission.[6] The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate was 87%. The outcome of these patients will be compared with historical controls before more transplants are performed. Caution is warranted because most trials of early transplantation have reported outcomes only for transplanted patients, and not for the entire “denominator” of all patients at the time of diagnosis. The long natural history of low-grade lymphoma makes it difficult to demonstrate overall survival advantages with any treatment. The authors discuss the use of surrogate end points, such as the absence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–detectable lymphoma cells in bone marrow following transplantation.

Role of Purging

The role of purging in autologous stem-cell transplantation for NHL is controversial. The authors review their own studies demonstrating that patients who receive contaminated autologous grafts are more likely to relapse than are patients who receive uncontaminated marrow.

A recent French analysis demonstrated that relapse was less likely in NHL patients whose marrow was purged more aggressively.[7] An EBMTR analysis showed improved overall survival (but no difference in progression-free survival) in low-grade NHL patients who received purged autografts.[8] These trials provide additional indirect evidence for the value of purging, although prospective trials are needed.

A European trial attempted to address this issue.[9] Patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma received three cycles of salvage chemotherapy. Responders were randomized to three more cycles of chemotherapy, unpurged autologous stem-cell transplantation, or purged autologous stem-cell transplantation. This trial closed early due to poor patient accrual.

A preliminary analysis showed that patients treated with chemotherapy have a significantly higher relapse rate than transplanted patients, although no differences between purged and unpurged transplants have been noted.[personal communication, H. Schouten, August 1999] In the absence of firm data, many believe that it is reasonable to attempt purging or transplantation with purified CD34+ progenitor cells as long as it is not associated with other toxicity.

Allogeneic Transplantation

Compared with autologous stem-cell transplantation, allogeneic transplantation has the potential advantages of uncontaminated marrow and a graft-vs-lymphoma effect. Freedman et al note lower relapse rates after allogeneic transplantation for NHL than after autologous grafting. These reports support the existence of a graft-vs-lymphoma effect. Further support comes from reports of lymphoma regression after withdrawal of immunosuppression in patients who relapse after allogeneic transplantation.[10]

The International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry results of allogeneic transplantation for low-grade lymphoma suggest the presence of a survival plateau.[11] However, nonrelapse mortality has been 30% to 40% in most series. A French registry analysis revealed an actuarial relapse rate of 12% at 5 years following allogeneic transplantation, as compared with a rate of 55% following autologous stem-cell transplantation (P < .001).[12] Event-free survival at 4 years was estimated to be 53% with allogeneic transplantation vs 45% with autologous transplantation. No events were observed later than 15 months after allogeneic transplantation, whereas a continuous pattern of progression was observed after autologous grafting. These results suggest that it may take several years before any survival advantage of allogeneic transplantation can be detected.

An EBMTR analysis also compared the results of autologous vs allogeneic transplantation for low-grade NHL.[13] Despite a higher relapse rate, overall survival at 4 years was significantly higher following autologous stem-cell transplantation, because of the high mortality associated with allogeneic transplantation.

The low relapse rate following allogeneic transplantation provides strong support for the use of immunotherapy for low-grade lymphoma. Freedman et al mention the use of low-intensity allogeneic transplantation. This approach may be able to exploit a graft-vs-lymphoma effect with lower mortality than does “conventional” allogeneic transplantation. There is intense interest and enthusiasm for low-intensity allogeneic transplantation.[14] However, a therapy rarely provides “something for nothing,” and mature data are needed to sort out the benefits vs risks of this approach.

Conclusions and Future Directions

Despite the increasing use of transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma, its role remains undefined. Ultimately, randomized trials may be the only way to determine whether the “emperor is wearing any clothes.”

Freedman et al discuss the use of various post-transplant treatments to improve results. Several ongoing trials are evaluating the use of rituximab either combined with or following autologous stem-cell transplantation for follicular NHL. The use of vaccination after autologous transplantation is also discussed; preliminary reports suggest that cellular and humoral immune responses can be generated soon after autologous stem-cell transplantation for lymphoma.[15]

References:

1. Colombat PH, Donadio D, Fouillard L, et al: Value of autologous bone marrow transplantation in follicular lymphoma: A France Autogreffe retrospective study of 42 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 13:157-162, 1994.

2. Friedberg J, Neuberg D, Gribben J, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation after histologic transformation of indolent B cell malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 5:262-268, 1999.

3. Williams C, Taghipour G, Lister T, et al: Chemosensitive transformed follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) is a firm indication for high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation: A study from the EBMTR (abstract). Blood 88(suppl 1):685a, 1996.

4. Freedman A, Gribben J, Neuberg D, et al: High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma during first remission. Blood 88:2780-2786, 1996.

5. Morel P, Laporte J, Noel M, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation therapy may prolong remission in newly diagnosed high-risk follicular lymphoma: A pilot study of 34 cases. Leukemia 9:576-582, 1995.

6. Horning S, Negrin R, Hoppe R, et al: High-dose therapy and autografting for follicular low-grade lymphoma in first remission: The Stanford experience (abstract). Blood 90(suppl 1):594a-595a, 1997.

7. Fouillard L, Laporte J, Labopin M, et al: Autologous stem-cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: The role of graft purging and radiotherapy post-transplantation: Results of a retrospective analysis on 120 patients autografted in a single institution. J Clin Oncol 16:2803-2816, 1998.

8. Williams C, Goldstone A, Pearce R, et al: Purging of bone marrow in autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A case-matched comparison with unpurged cases by the European Blood and Marrow Transplant Lymphoma Registry. J Clin Oncol 14:2454-2464, 1996.

9. Schouten H, Sydes M, Kvalheim G, et al: The European CUP/UP Trial: A preliminary analysis of autologous transplantation for relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in Dicke K, Keating A (eds): Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplantation: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium (Arlington, Texas), pp 161-165. Charlottesville, Virginia, Carden Jennings, 1999.

10. van Besien K, de Lima M, Giralt S, et al: Management of lymphoma recurrence after allogeneic transplantation: The relevance of graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Bone Marrow Transplant 19:977-982, 1997.

11. van Besien K, Sobocinski K, Rowlings P, et al: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for low-grade lymphoma. Blood 92:1832-1836, 1998.

12. Attal M, Socié G, Molina L, et al: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for refractory and recurrent follicular lymphoma: A case-matched analysis with autologous transplantation from the French Bone Marrow Transplant Group Registry data (abstract). Blood 90(suppl 1):255a, 1997.

13. Peniket A, Ruiz de Elvira M, Taghipour G, et al: Allogeneic transplantation for lymphoma produces a lower relapse rate than autologous transplantation but survival is worse because of higher treatment related mortality: A report of 764 cases from the EBMT lymphoma registry (abstract). Blood 90(suppl 1):255a, 1997.

14. Champlin R, Khouri I, Komblau S, et al: Reinventing bone marrow transplantation: Nonmyeloablative preparative regimens and induction of graft-vs-malignancy effect. Oncology 13:621-628, 1999.

15. Davis T, Hsu F, Caspar C, et al: Idiotype vaccination following ABMT can stimulate specific anti-idiotype immune responses in patients with B-cell lymphoma (B-NHL) (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:3a, 1999.

Articles in this issue

Comparative Economic Analysis of the Treatment of Relapsed Low-Grade B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) in France Using CHOP, Fludarabine, or Rituximab
FHIT Gene, Smoking, and Cervical Cancer
Final Report on the Safety and Efficacy of Retreatment With Rituximab for Patients With Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study of Zevalin Radioimmunotherapy Compared to Rituximab Immunotherapy for B-Cell, Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma: Interim Results
IOM Medical Error Estimates Questioned, But Legislation Considered
Less Toxic Therapies for Hodgkin’s Disease May Reduce Secondary Cancers
Preserving Fertility in Young Women With Ovarian Cancer Does Not Decrease Survival
Iodine-131 Tositumomab for Patients With Transformed, Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Overall Clinical Trial Experience
Survival Rates Significantly Worse For African-Americans With Endometrial Cancer
Rituximab Has Significant Activity in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Responders to Rituximab Show Continued Tumor Regression Over Time and a Progression-Free Survival That Correlates With Response Classification
PhRMA Criticizes FDA’s Proposed Rule on Antibiotic Approvals
Phase II Study of Rituximab in Combination With CHOP in Patients With Previously Untreated Intermediate- or High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
New Antibiotic Effective in Treating Gram-Positive Bacteremia
Reduced-Dose Zevalin Radioimmunotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin&#146;s Lymphoma Patients With Preexisting Thrombocytopenia: Report of Interim Results of a Phase II Trial
Related Videos
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
There is no absolute age cutoff where CAR T cells are contraindicated for those with large B-cell lymphoma, says David L. Porter, MD.
David L. Porter, MD, emphasizes referring patients with large B-cell lymphoma early for CAR T-cell therapy consultation.
It may be applicable to administer CAR T-cell therapy to patients with large B-cell lymphoma in a community or outpatient setting.