Data Show Barriers to Immunotherapy Access in Clear Cell RCC Population

News
Article

Findings from a retrospective analysis indicate that treatment in non-academic cancer centers correlates with a decreased rate of immunotherapy use among patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

"As [immunotherapy] becomes increasingly utilized, further studies to monitor socioeconomic disparities in utilization and interventions to address access in less wealthy, ethnically vulnerable communities [are needed]," according to the study authors.

"As [immunotherapy] becomes increasingly utilized, further studies to monitor socioeconomic disparities in utilization and interventions to address access in less wealthy, ethnically vulnerable communities [are needed]," according to the study authors.

Patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from certain socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds are less likely to receive treatment with immunotherapy (IO) regimens, including Black, Hispanic, and uninsured patients, according to findings from a retrospective analysis presented at the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting.

“The first granted approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 was nivolumab. Since FDA approval, IO drugs have increasingly become the backbone of therapy for advanced ccRCC. However, despite clear survival benefit, there are often barriers to access to these therapies,” wrote the authors, led by Levi Holland, MD, a urology resident at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, working with Solomon Woldu, MD, and coauthors.

Overall, the investigators identified 15,926 patients who received a diagnosis of stage 4 ccRCC from 2015 to 2020 using data from the National Cancer Database. Among those, 5419 (34%) patients received IO treatment and were included for analysis. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had an unknown IO treatment status.

The primary outcome of interest was receipt of IO. Independent variables collected included patients’ age, year of diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo score, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, zip code (to inform median household income and education level in the patients’ zip codes), residential setting, travel distance, facility location, facility type, and state Medicaid expansion status.

Factors associated with an increased likelihood of receiving IO treatment upon multivariable logistic regression included a more recent year of diagnosis, younger age, and a lower Charlson-Deyo score.

Further, the data showed that Black race (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94; P = .009) was independently associated with a lower likelihood of receiving IO. Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.93; P = .006) was also shown to be independently associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving IO compared with non-Hispanic patients. Patients who were uninsured were also consistently less likely to receive IO compared with patients with any insurance, including private, Medicaid, Medicare, and other government programs.

Additionally, living in a community with the highest quartile of high school diplomas and the top 50% of median household income was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving treatment with IO. Compared with treatment administered at academic facilities, treatment in community or other non-academic cancer centers was associated with a decreased rate of IO treatment (OR, .86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95; P = .002).

Factors not found to have a significant impact on IO receipt included patient sex, residential setting, facility location, travel distance to facility, and a state’s Medicaid expansion status.

The authors concluded, “As IO becomes increasingly utilized, further studies to monitor socioeconomic disparities in utilization and interventions to address access in less wealthy, ethnically vulnerable communities [are needed].”

Reference

Holland L, Taylor J, Bhanvadia R, et al. Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in immunotherapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Presented at: 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology Annual Meeting. November 28 – December 1, 2023; Washington, DC. Abstract 101

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Related Content