Durvalumab Combination May Benefit Aggressive T-Cell Lymphoma Subgroups

Commentary
Video

Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Christiane Querfeld, MD, PhD, professor and director of the Cutaneous Lymphoma Program at City of Hope, about whether any specific subgroup benefit emerged when treating patients with refractory or advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with durvalumab (Imfinzi) combined with lenalidomide (Revlimid), as well as next steps for researching similar durvalumab-based therapies. Querfeld presented preliminary findings of a randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03011814) evaluating the combination therapy in this patient population at the 2024 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition (ASH).

Querfeld began by explaining that data she presented at ASH was preliminary, before stating that she hopes a final analysis will more effectively reveal subgroup benefit. She expressed that she has observed benefit in patients with large cell transformation and folliculotropism, as well as those with Sézary syndrome and erythrodermic mycosis fungoides, before reiterating that the final analysis will provide a more definitive answer on subgroup outcomes.

Querfeld then expressed that her team has planned an extension cohort, due to an observed benefit with the combination therapy in Black patients, who are more likely to have the disease. She further explained that by expanding the cohort to include patients with more aggressive forms of disease, as well as those who experience disparities, her team is seeking to better understand the impact of durvalumab plus lenalidomide in these patient subgroups. Querfeld suggested that her team was seeking to learn more from other T-cell lymphoma subtypes and solid tumor indications.

Efficacy findings from the trial showed that at a median follow-up time of 14.5 months (range, 0.9-29.7), the best global objective response rate was 42% for the durvalumab monotherapy arm vs 75% in the durvalumab combination therapy arm. Additionally, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months (95% CI, 2.2-not evaluable [NE]) in the monotherapy arm and not reached in the combination arm (95% CI, 2.8 months-NE).

Transcript:

These [data are preliminary], and hopefully the final analysis will come out for more specific details, but particularly, patients with large cell transformation and folliculotropism benefited from the treatment. We have also seen patients with Sézary syndrome and erythrodermic mycosis fungoides...benefiting from this treatment. [We] will have to wait until we have the final analysis available.

[Regarding the steps], we planned an extension cohort. What I forgot to mention is that, when we are talking about disparities, we know that the disease is most commonly seen in Black patients––[so] the question is whether the patients have more biologic, aggressive disease. We have included 5 patients in the combination arm, and we see that this patient population has [particularly] benefited from it.

Taking together all these aggressive subtypes, including disparities, we are expanding the cohort to include [more] patients to see how they benefit from this treatment, which is huge. We have [extended the trial] to another 40 patients. Hopefully, we can also potentially learn from other T-cell lymphomas. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma [PTCL] is still a group, so we could learn from that and potentially even [from] other solid tumors.

Reference

Querfeld C, Chen L, Wu X, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial of the anti-pd-l1 monoclonal antibody durvalumab plus lenalidomide versus single-agent durvalumab in patients with refractory/advanced cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Blood. 2024;144(suppl 1):468. doi:10.1182/blood-2024-205617

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
An ongoing phase 1 trial seeks to prove XmAb819 as an effective treatment and ENPP3 as a plausible target in patients with relapsed or refractory RCC.
“The therapy is designed to prevent both CAR T-cell inactivation and to restore the anti-tumor immunity of the white blood cells that have gotten through the tumor,” said Marasco, MD, PhD.
Ongoing studies aim to combine base immunotherapy regimens with novel agents to potentially improve outcomes among patients with kidney cancer.
Investigators have found a way to reduce liver and biliary toxicity when targeting the molecule CAIX in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Neoantigen-targeting vaccines resulted in an absence of recurrence in 9 patients with high-risk kidney cancer, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
The Kidney Cancer Research Consortium may allow collaborators to form more mechanistic and scientifically driven efforts in the field.
Wayne A. Marasco, MD, PhD, stated that by targeting 2 molecules instead of 1, higher levels of tumor cell killing can be achieved in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content