EFS Improvement Seen With Axi-Cel vs Standard of Care in Relapsed/Refractory LBCL

The ZUMA-7 trial demonstrated an event-free survival improvement in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel.

An event-free survival improvement by 60% was seen in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who were being treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta) as second-line treatment compared with standard of care (SOC), according to the phase 3 ZUMA-7 (NCT03391466) trial presented at the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.

At a median follow-up of 24.9 months, findings showed that the median EFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 4.5-15.8) for patients on axi-cel compared with 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.6-2.8) for those on SOC chemotherapy (HR, 0.398; 95% CI, 0.308-0.514; P < .0001). The 2-year EFS rates in the investigative and control arms were 40.5% (95% CI, 33.2%-47.7%) and 16.3% (95% CI, 11.1%-22.2%), respectively.

EFS was superior with axi-cel over SOC across key patient subgroups, including age (<65 years; HR, 0.490 vs ≥65 years; HR, 0.276), response to first-line therapy at randomization (primary refractory; HR, 0.426 vs relapsed within 1 year of frontline therapy; HR, 0.342), Second-Line Age-Adjusted International Prognostic Index (sAAIPI) stage (0-1; HR, 0.407 vs 2-3; HR, 0.388), and prognostic marker per central laboratory (high-grade B-cell lymphoma [HGBL]-double/triple-hit; HR, 0.285 vs double-expressor lymphoma; HR, 0.424).

“ZUMA-7 met its primary EFS end point, demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy with axi-cel vs second-line SOC in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma,” lead study author Frederick Locke, MD, said in a presentation on the data during the meeting.

“Axi-cel showed superiority over standard of care with over 4-fold greater median EFS, 2.5-fold greater 2-year EFS, a 33% higher objective response rate, double the complete response rate, and EFS improvements across key subgroups,” Locke, who is vice chair of the Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy at Moffitt Cancer Center, added. “Results from the ZUMA-7 trial herald a paradigm shift: axi-cel should be a new standard for patients with second-line relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.”

Currently, standard second-line treatment in the curative setting, is salvage chemotherapy followed by consolidation high-dose therapy (HDT)–autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, most patients are unable to receive HDT-ASCT, and these patients have a poor prognosis.

Axi-cel is an autologous CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy that is currently FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL after at least 2 lines of systemic therapy.

ZUMA-7 is the first randomized, international, multicenter, phase 3 trial of axi-cel compared with SOC as a second-line treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL. A total of 359 patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL across 77 sites were randomized 1:1 to receive axi-cel plus conditioning chemotherapy (n = 180) or SOC with investigator-selected platinum-based chemoimmunotherapy (n = 179). An initial disease assessment was done at day 50; those on axi-cel continued to day 100, day 150, and long-term follow-up. Responders to SOC, either with a complete or partial response, proceeded to HDT-ASCT; nonresponders received additional treatment off of protocol.

To be eligible for enrollment, patients had to be aged at least 18 years of age, have LBCL that was relapsed/refractory within 12 months of frontline therapy, and had intentions to proceed to HDT-ASCT. Stratification factors included response to frontline therapy and sAAIPI.

Steroid-only bridging therapy, without chemotherapy, was optional.

The primary end point of the trial was EFS by blinded central review; key secondary end points are progression-free survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. There was no protocol-specified crossover.

Patients were enrolled between January 25, 2018 and October 4, 2019. For the EFS primary analysis, the data cutoff date was March 18, 2021, at which point, 250 events had occurred.

Of the 180 patients randomized to axi-cel, 94% received treatment with the CAR T-cell therapy.

Of those enrolled to the SOC arm (n = 179), 36% of patients received HDT-ASCT.

Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the 2 arms. Overall, the median age was 59 years (range, 21-81), and 30% of patients were 65 years and older. Most patients (79%) had stage III/IV disease, and 45% of patients had a sAAIPI of 2 to 3. Most patients (74%) were primary refractory to their frontline therapy vs 26% who relapsed within 1 year of their prior treatment. Sixteen percent of patients had high-grade BL (double-/triple-hit) vs 33% who had double-expressor lymphoma and 6% who had MYC rearrangement. Fifty-four percent of patients had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels.

Additional findings showed that the objective response rate was 83% with axi-cel vs 50% with SOC (odds ratio, 5.31; 95% CI, 3.1-8.9; P < .0001). In the axi-cel arm, the ORR consisted of a 65% complete response rate and a 18% partial response rate; these rates were 32% and 18%, respectively, in the SOC arm.

At the time of the interim analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI, 28.3–not evaluable [NE]) with axi-cel compared with 35.1 months (95% CI, 18.5–NE) with SOC (HR, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.530-1.007; P = .0270).

Further data showed that 56% of patients on the SOC arm received subsequent cellular immunotherapy off protocol, and Locke said that a preplanned sensitivity analysis suggests an OS benefit with axi-cel that is likely confounded by SOC treatment switching.

“The primary OS analysis will occur in the future,” Locke noted.

Regarding safety, grade 3 or higher adverse effects (AEs) occurred in 91% of patients on axi-cel compared with 83% of those on SOC, the most common of which included neutropenia (69% vs 41%, respectively), anemia (30% vs 39%), and leukopenia (29% vs 22%). Grade 3 or higher serious AEs occurred in 42% and 40% of patients on axi-cel and SOC, respectively.

Fifty-five deaths occurred on the axi-cel arm, reasons for which included progressive disease (n = 47), grade 5 AE during protocol-specified reporting period (n = 7), and definitive therapy-related mortality (n = 1). This was in comparison to 68 deaths on the SOC arm, with the same reasons occurring in 64, 2, and 2 patients, respectively.

Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome occurred in 6% of patients on axi-cel; the most common any-grade symptoms were pyrexia (99%), hypotension (43%), and sinus tachycardia (31%). CRS was managed by tocilizumab (Actemra; 65%), corticosteroids (24%), and vasopressors (6%). The median time to onset was 3 days and the median duration of events was 7 days.

Grade 3 or higher neurologic events occurred in 21% of axi-cel–treated patients and 1% of SOC-treated patients; the most common symptoms included tremor (26% with axi-cel vs 1% with SOC), confusional state (24% vs 2%, respectively), and aphasia (21% vs 0%). These were all managed by corticosteroids. The median time to onset was 7 days with axi-cel and 23 days with SOC; the median duration of events was 9 days and 23 days, respectively.

Locke also noted that CAR T-cell levels were associated with objective response, and tumor burden impacted complete response rate in the SOC arm.

“Higher tumor burden was associated with decrease likelihood of complete response in the standard-of-care arm,” said Locke. “In contrast, higher tumor burden did not predict for a lower likelihood for complete response in the axi-cel arm.”


Locke F, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Primary analysis of ZUMA‑7: a phase 3 randomized trial of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) versus standard‑of‑care therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Presented at: 2021 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 11-14, 2021; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 2.

Related Videos
Daniel G. Stover, MD, suggests that stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes may serve as a biomarker of immune activation and can potentially help optimize therapy with microtubule-targeting agents for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, discusses how, compared with antibody-drug conjugates, chemotherapy produces low response rates and disease control in the treatment of those with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Hope Rugo, MD, speaks to the importance of identifying patients with aromatase inhibitor–resistant, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who are undergoing treatment with capivasertib/fulvestrant who may be at a high risk of developing diabetes or hyperglycemia.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, describes the benefit of sacituzumab govitecan for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer seen in the final overall survival analysis of the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study.
An expert from Vanderbilt University Medical Center says that patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma may be able to live a normal life following response to salvage treatment with bispecific monoclonal antibodies.
A recovery tracker and other digital tools may be useful in helping to manage patient symptoms following debulking surgery for gynecologic cancer, according to an expert from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Common symptoms following debulking surgery for gynecologic cancer appear to include pain, diarrhea, and nausea, according to an expert from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Patients who use a recovery tracker tool appear to experience lower hospital readmission rates following gynecologic cancer debulking surgery compared with those who did not.
Medical oncologists and gynecologic oncologists alike have a shared responsibility to help treat symptoms of neuropathy in patients undergoing chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer, according to an expert from Duke University Medical Center.
Future research assessing cryocompression for those with gynecologic cancers will make use of different products to make the intervention easier and more accessible for patients.