Efstathios Kastritis, MD, on Implications of Positive Results From the Phase 3 ANDROMEDA Study


The phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial demonstrated positive efficacy and safety data in the treatment of newly diagnosed light chain amyloidosis.

At the 2021 American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® sat down with Efstathios Kastritis, MD, professor of medical oncology at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, in Athens, Greece, to discuss the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial (NCT03201965). The expert detailed what these results mean for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis with subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA; Darzalex) plus bortezomib (Velcade), cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCd) moving forward.


Based on the results of the ANDROMEDA study, the combination of daratumumab with VCd has become the first official approved therapy for AL amyloidosis. So first of all, our patients will finally have a very effective therapy that is also quite safe since we didn’t see any additional safety signals with the combinations with the addition of daratumumab to VCd.

The improvement in the complete hematologic response rates is very important because we know that this is the most important factor associated with the improvement in overall survival and also with improvement in organ function. Actually, this is where we see a doubling of organ response rates, which probably will further improve in the future.


Kastritis E, Sanchorawala V, Merlini G, et al. Subcutaneous daratumumab + bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCd) in patients with newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis: Updated results from the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):8003. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8003

Related Videos
Additional analyses of patient-reported outcomes and MRD status in the QuANTUM-First trial are also ongoing, says Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD.
Investigators must continue to explore the space for lisocabtagene maraleucel in mantle cell lymphoma, according to Manali Kamdar, MD.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Considering notable adverse effects associated with treatment may be critical when selecting therapy options for those with CML.
Whether CAR T-cell therapy or T-cell engagers should dominate the multiple myeloma landscape may be hard to determine, says David S. Siegel, MD.
Next steps for research in the multiple myeloma space may include the development of novel CAR T-cell strategies and bispecific antibodies.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Related Content