Ensuring Quality of Life in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Populations

Commentary
Video

Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.

When assessing a treatment course for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), clinicians should aim to maintain long-term patient quality of life by limiting the number of symptoms and adverse effects (AEs) they have during their therapy, according to Claire Saxton, MBA.

Saxton, the executive vice president of Insights and Impact at Cancer Support Community, spoke with CancerNetwork® at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting about what patients with CML should expect in terms of communication and potential toxicity during their therapy.

Saxton highlighted how patients should openly communicate with their providers about any toxicities that may impact their quality of life during treatment. For example, patients should inform their treatment team about any experiences related to AEs such as fatigue or diarrhea, which can affect their ability to participate in personal activities or use public transportation.

According to Saxton, discussing these toxicities allows providers to better understand the patient’s perspective on how much their daily routine changes due to treatment for CML. As a result of these conversations, providers may then be able to adjust the treatment course to help improve patient’s quality of life.

Transcript:

In the long term, the treatment journey is [about] keeping [patients from] having as few symptoms and AEs and [ensuring] as good a quality of life as possible. [Patients should] be clear with [their] treatment team: "My fatigue means that I can’t do some of my favorite things. The fact that I have diarrhea means that I can’t take the bus to work anymore."

When [patients] put things in the perspective of how [CML is] affecting [their] everyday life, the treatment team will be much better able to make sure that whatever treatment that [they are] on is the one that is giving [them] the best quality of life.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
CAR T-cell therapies appear to be an evolving modality in the treatment of those with intracranial tumors, said Sylvia Kurz, MD, PhD.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
CancerNetwork® spoke with Neha Mehta-Shah, MD, MSCI, about the clinical landscape for patients undergoing treatment for rare lymphomas.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
Related Content